ELECTION ASSUMPTIONS & EXPECTATIONS
By Jim Camp
We want to “know” the candidate before we vote for him. The campaign makes significant efforts to provide a believable biography of their candidate. Part of my biography was my service in Vietnam. The same war saw U.S. Senator John Sidney McCain’s physical strength, mental toughness, and character tested through five years of imprisonment. By contrast, U.S. Senator Barack Hussein Obama has not had the opportunity to serve in war, but there are other means by which to judge his courage and foresight
As I point out in my book, No. The Only Negotiating System You Need for Work or Home, we got into the Vietnam War and remained engaged in it on the basis of incorrect assumptions.
Each voter has to approach the coming election as if it were a blank slate. There looms for each of us the potential of being absolutely certain and absolutely wrong. As a negotiations coach, I teach students and clients to forget their positive and negative expectations. I tell them to stay with their mission and purpose, and, most important of all, their principles.
By late July, 2008, following his whirlwind tour of the Middle East and Europe, Senator Obama returned to discover that, according to Rasmussen Reports, an astonishing 63% of potential voters did not believe the trip had made him any more qualified to be U.S. President.
Given the instability of the Middle East and our dependency, in part, on its oil, an Iraq that can demonstrate stability and movement toward a constitutional democratic form of governance looms large in how people will cast their vote. I believe that most Americans have concluded that leaving before achieving that mission would be a big mistake. We need, therefore, to know what assumptions both of the presidential candidates have made regarding the outcome of the conflict in Iraq.
Remember, though, assumptions as regards politicians or in any negotiation can be seriously wrong. Lost in the midst of the campaign is the fact that, however wrong President George W. Bush’s assumptions may have been to invade Iraq, after replacing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and heeding the advice of his generals, the war has moved steadily toward an improved status involving a serious reduction in conflict and a growing political coalition in Iraq between competing sects and national parties.
Ultimately, the projection of American power in that vital region of the world appears to be yielding good results. Saddam Hussein, who had invaded Iran in the 1980s and Kuwait in the 1990s, is gone. Al-Qa'ida has been seriously degraded. The ultimate mission is showing signs of real success. At some point in the campaign, voters need to know what assumptions both presidential candidates have made regarding the unfinished job in Afghanistan.
The candidates the voters come to “know” are primarily the campaign biographies presented to them via their websites, television commercials, and their speeches.
Again, relying on my years of training people to negotiate successfully, permit me to point out that, just as dangerous as assumptions can be, so too are expectations, and political campaigns are all about expectations.
Most people believe they are pretty good at “reading” other people, at understanding what they are really feeling and thinking. This is often a serious error when negotiating. In terms of the current campaigns and the times in which they are being conducted, rapid national and international changes must be factored into a voter’s decision. One example is the recent invasion of Georgia [Gruzia] by the Russian Federation. That is now a factor in determining which U.S. presidential candidate responded best to it.
Senator Obama’s primary political theme is “change.” I challenge you, however, to ask yourself if anyone could have anticipated the change that occurred on September 11, 2001? Could anyone have anticipated the mortgage loan bubble that has burst in the last year? Could anyone have anticipated $4.00-a-gallon gasoline? No one expected 9/11, despite warnings that such an attack could occur. It defied the imagination. No one would have predicted the current status of our nation’s economy, but we expect Presidents to respond effectively when such events occur.
My advice is to not assume anything about Senator Obama or Senator McCain. Do not assume you know what they are thinking and do not let your expectations interfere with your decision, as regards the very real questions of McCain’s or Obama’s experience, character, and judgment.
Instead, do what any good negotiator would do. Learn as much as you can about Senator Obama and Senator McCain. There are ample sources of credible information beyond the daily babble of media pundits.
Every election is about assumptions and expectations. Make sure that your's are based on facts, not emotion. Read their books and their voting history. Ask questions of the commentary you listen to or read. Work at being informed.
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security
Page Two Page One
U.S. National Security Strategy
Jim Camp is an internationally recognized expert on negotiation and the author of two bestselling books on the subject. His
website is www.startwithno.com.
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor