WHY PRESIDENT BUSH IS SO REVILED
By Christopher G. Adamo
To be sure, President Bush has done a few things right during his two terms. Despite the caterwauling of the Left regarding the fabricated “abuses” of hard-bitten terrorists at Guantanamo, phony hysterics over “spying” on American citizens and the concocted “quagmire” in Iraq, America’s prosecution of the terror war has been phenomenally successful.
The most profound evidence to prove this point is the indifference and apathy with which most Americans now regard the terrorist threat. It is a luxury they can only afford in the aftermath of a victorious campaign against the Islamic fanatics who staged the massive attacks against America on September 11, 2001, with plans for many more to follow.
Another Bush success that will likely endure for many years is his nomination of Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito on the U.S. Supreme Court. They were bold choices who ultimately overcame the Liberal games on Capitol Hill by virtue of their steadfast and well-articulated devotion to constitutional principle. And, as such, these newest members of the nation’s highest court hold the potential to realign the court with its original purpose, which was to uphold the principles of the nation’s founding.
Nevertheless, the overall effect of eight years of the Bush White House is that the Republican Party is in shambles. Conservatism has been so seriously undermined that it risks being permanently relegated to the fringe of political discourse (at least among the ruling class). Any intellectually honest analysis of the current situation requires a majority of the blame to be laid at the feet of George W. Bush. To shun this painful truth, whether in deference to the President or for fear of being grouped among the Liberal Democrats, is to fail to address the problems that have devastated the GOP, and thus ensure that the situation is not corrected.
From the moment George Bush coined his vapid “compassionate Conservatism” rhetoric during the 2000 campaign, principled Conservatives knew they were in trouble. Bush was, in essence, saying that real Conservatism was inherently insufficient to sustain a worthwhile society. Hence, a sprinkling of Liberalism would be needed to soften it into a form that would be less harsh to America’s “victim class.”
Nothing could have been more ill-advised and counter-productive, either as a campaign strategy (Al Gore did garner a majority of the popular vote) or as a governing philosophy. And, ever since George Bush’s ascension to the nation’s highest office, America has been subjected to one ill-conceived effort after another intended to institute this flawed ideology. The results have been disastrous. And it may be a very long time, if ever, before the damage can be reversed.
From the inarguably Socialist Medicare prescription drug entitlement, to the blatant unconstitutionality of campaign finance “reform,” to the bloated and botched Kennedy education bill, the devastation wreaked by George Bush and his “compassionate Conservatism” is almost beyond comprehension. In essence, he affirmed that Liberalism was inherently right and good, and merely needed a few adjustments, thus legitimizing the nanny-state, while driving Reagan Conservatism into a needlessly defensive position.
In return for his efforts at accommodating the political Left, the President received undiluted venom from Democrats. Never gaining their loyalty or appreciation, he became a by-word for everything they revile among Republicans. Democratic Party leaders claimed to despise him, as a standard bearer of the extreme Right, but, in truth, he was their invaluable ally, both as a target of their attacks and a regular means of undermining any real Conservative opposition.
Unfortunately, instead of recognizing the futility of such attempts at mollifying the Left, he has continued in this pattern throughout the entirety of his Presidency. The result has been one Republican disaster after another. The 2006 mid-term elections were defined by a public revulsion with the GOP, which had clearly gone wobbly in its commitment to Conservative principle.
This pattern reached its abominable climax last Fall as President Bush, in the midst of a hotly contested campaign to elect his successor, took the lead in supporting the foolhardy expenditure of nearly a trillion dollars in a dishonest effort to “bailout” the thoroughly corrupted and politicized government lending institutions of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
America’s economic future, we were told, was at stake. What resulted was a virtual nationalization of the banking industry, with nationalization other major American business interests soon to follow. But, while few Americans were surprised at such double-dealing from the likes of Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (Democrat - CT) or House “Financial Services” Committee Chairman Barney Frank (Democrat - MA) from whom Socialist entanglements are the norm, the collaboration of Republicans, at the urging of President Bush, has been an outrage.
At a time when Republicans could have made great electoral gains by unashamedly characterizing themselves as the proper carriers of the torch of fiscal responsibility, while righteously holding Democrats responsible for the mess they created, President Bush rode in to the rescue of the Democrats. Thus was the fate of the GOP in the 2008 elections sealed.
Even during the time of presidential transition, George Bush seems to be doing his best to offer “moral support” and encouragement to the American Left. Right up until the end of his Presidency, Bush loudly touts the collectivist philosophies that opened the floodgates to trillion dollar deficits, while doing nothing to “fix” the still flagging economy. And, throughout this time, he has steadfastly refused every opportunity to assign blame to those who originally caused the problem and have since worsened it.
In only the last few days, President Bush worked to further remove any remaining wind from the sails of Conservatives by publicly lamenting his inability to grant amnesty to the twenty million or more illegal aliens in this country. On yet another key issue that could contrast Right and Left, Republican and Democrat, Liberal and Conservative inside Washington, President Bush has done his best to blur the lines.
Ronald Reagan polarized the nation by virtue of his stridently held and courageously professed Conservative beliefs. The result was an eight-year media firestorm of criticism. But, in the end, their relentless condemnation of him could not prevail against a committed and loyal base of support from the Conservative grassroots.
In sorry contrast, George Bush’s wretched unpopularity stands as proof of what awaits a socalled “moderate” who disparages his base, while seeking the good will of the Liberal opposition. Nobody on either side of the aisle will remain to defend him, even for his occasional worthwhile actions. This is hardly the route back to political viability for Republicans.
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer who lives in southeastern Wyoming and works in the field of industrial instrumentation.
He is actively involved in Wyoming's political process, serving as a delegate to successive Wyoming State Republican Conventions
and as a member of the Wyoming State Republican Central Committee. He has assisted Republican candidates for local and state
legislatures and for the United States Congress. His articles, which appear regularly in The Progressive Conservative, U.S.A.,
and on a number of other websites, reflect a major concern with the damage being done to Conservatism and Conservative causes by
the Liberal Leftist faction in the Republican Party as well as by the much larger and more powerful Liberal Leftist faction in the
Democratic Party. During the early and middle 1990s, Adamo was Editor of the Wyoming Christian Coalition's official news organ,
The Wyoming Christian.
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor