WILL THE GOP FOLLOW THE "MODERATES" INTO OBLIVION?
By Christopher G. Adamo
What is rarely recalled is that, four years later in the Republican National Convention, the official party policy was to avoid any mention whatsoever of the entire abortion issue. GOP presidential candidate Bob Dole sought to sidestep controversy that party insiders feared might be overly “divisive,” since that is how the major media and the Democrats portrayed defining moral issues such as abortion. With the Conservative base thoroughly dispirited by this and a host of similar actions, Dole lost that race, leaving the Republicans to flounder for another four years.
Dole’s fate was consistent with the pattern of Republican presidential candidates and their regard for Conservatism in general. Those who boldly and unabashedly carried the Conservative “torch” have done well, while any who attempt to “move to the political Center” and “find common ground” with the political Left will be abandoned by Conservative voters. John McCain, while claiming to do both, succeeded at neither. And his electoral results proved it.
Herein lies the picture of a losing Republican “strategy” to which its Liberal members doggedly cling, despite results that have been consistently disastrous over the years. Every attempt to water down the GOP platform, in a futile quest to widen its appeal, has had exactly the opposite effect. Seeking to portray themselves as standing for everything, such self-serving Party insiders are rightly recognized as standing for nothing.
Nevertheless, an infuriatingly effective ruse from media Liberals and Democratic Party political hacks has been to convince congressional Republicans to “moderate” their position (read: accommodate the Liberal agenda). When voters exhibit their outrage by abandoning such Republicans at the polls, those same Liberal Leftist Democrats assert loudly that the Republican Party is still “too Conservative” and thus needs to drink more of the poison that has been killing it. Cowardice, whether in day to day life or in the political arena, is by definition easy to manipulate. Thus the most timid Republicans can be counted upon to follow this lead.
Arlen Specter’s recent official abandonment of the Republican Party (as opposed to the unofficial manner in which he has been doing so for years) provides a powerful case in point. Since Specter made his announcement to switch to the Democrats, Liberal activists such as James Carville have predictably insisted that the move represents undeniable proof of an excessively narrow governing philosophy among the Republicans. Thus, we are told, the only winning strategy is for the GOP to move even further Left, in order to accommodate the likes of Specter.
“Conventional wisdom,” stubbornly promoted by the ruling class on both sides of the aisle, insists that the ultimate purpose of a political party is to get its members elected to office. In truth, such a notion represents defining evidence of a party in decline. The founding purpose of a political party is always to advance a particular set of ideas. The chances of those ideas being adopted as public policy will increase with greater popular support and the strength that lies in numbers; hence, a political party is established to move the particular banner forward.
Unfortunately, at some point along the way, those doing the moving and shaking inevitably shift their focus from “the cause” to their own fortunes, at which point the true political philosophy or ideology that undergirded their formation into a political party is likely to take a back seat to the presumed pragmatism of the moment.
It is at this juncture that the present day Republican Party is completely foundering, and will continue to do so, unless its reins can be seized by a cabal of true Conservatives who are neither willing to accept a thoroughly biased view of the world as presented on the nightly news, or cowed by the inevitable personal attacks against them from the Left. Efforts to make the Party more appealing by mimicking the Democrats will neither ingratiate the Party to the news anchors nor inspire voters to rally to it. Who could be expected to derive inspiration from a cheap imitation of the Hard-Left, when the real thing is readily available from the Democrats?
It is wholly frustrating to the Conservative base that the road to Republican victory lies so blatantly in front of myopic Party insiders, yet they refuse to recognize it. In the wake of Bill Clinton’s 1992 electoral mandate with its “resounding” forty-eight percent of the vote, Newt Gingrich rallied the Republican Party to adopt a Conservative manifesto known as the “Contract With America.” Despite media coverage that was universally disparaging, Gingrich led the Republicans to a stunning victory in the 1994 mid-term congressional elections.
Had Gingrich remained true to his principles, he may well have thoroughly routed the Democrats, including Bill Clinton, in 1996. It was only when he, as House Speaker, along with then Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, essentially validated Clinton’s fiscally excessive policies by caving in to him on the 1995 budget showdown that Republican momentum was rebuffed.
A similar opportunity exists for Republicans now, if a sufficient number have the courage and forthrightness to recognize and seize upon it. Americans are no more enthused at the prospect of Republican “cooperation” with the political Left than they were in 2006 or 2008. And despite media stories to the contrary, a considerable backlash against the severe overindulgences of the Obama administration looms.
Whether or not that sentiment ever coalesces into a renewed Republican vitality will depend solely on the character of Party leaders, who can either listen to the discredited “moderate experts” and consign themselves to permanent minority status, or seize the moment on behalf of traditional America and ride it to victory.
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer and staff writer for the New
Media Alliance. He lives in southeastern Wyoming. He has been active in
local and state politics for many years and is a managing partner in Best
American Buy (www.bestamericanbuy.com), an e-commerce business that markets
products exclusively made in America. His contact information and archives
can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor