SOTOMAYOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE:
WHY BOTHER WITH THE CONSTITUTION
By Christopher G. Adamo
Among Republicans, the big controversy on which the fate of the nation (or, at least, the electoral fortunes of some spineless career politicians) rests, is whether or not it is appropriate to deem Sotomayor’s blatantly racist comments as “racist.” Sadly, Republicans are once again running scared from the honest characterization of Sotomayor as unacceptably skewed in her adjudications as a result of blatant racial prejudices. In this poisoned age of “political correctness,” it is obvious that only Conservative white males will ever be assessed on such grounds.
Yet, with the integrity of the U.S. Constitution likely facing a fatal final assault, supposedly stalwart Conservatives such as Senator John Cornyn of Texas believe their time and energy is best spent castigating Rush Limbaugh for focusing on a remark by Sotomayor that clearly would have ended the political career of any white male public figure.
In a 2001 speech at the University of California Berkeley, Sotomayor asserted: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the riches of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” In a later decision that plainly reflects a consistency of such thought, she determined that minorities deserved promotion over white applicants in the New Haven, Connecticut, Fire Department, based solely on their race.
Sotomayor’s personal beliefs on the topic of race might not seem to directly undermine her ability to uphold her duties as a U.S. Supreme Court justice. However, the New Haven Fire Department case, and in particular the flimsy basis of her opinion, indicate, beyond any reasonable doubt, that she is perfectly willing to mete out grave injustice, provided she believes it can advance the race issue. Had her interest in righting racial injustice been at all counterbalanced by a reverence for constitutional principle, she should have run for a position on the City Council of New Haven, which would have been a far more appropriate venue to alter its hiring practices.
No Democrats, and appallingly few Republicans, are even willing to contend that this background constitutes ample reason to summarily disqualify her as a Supreme Court nominee. However, it should do precisely that. And any who contend otherwise, rather than being treated as reasoned and temperate in their commentary, ought to ever after be branded as willing to sacrifice the inviolability of the Constitution to the political fads of the moment. One can support true constitutional law or one can remain in the good graces of the political/media cabal of Liberal Leftists. But one cannot do both.
Despite Barack Obama’s brazen effort to frame the Sotomayor nomination strictly in terms of the glory of her personal trials and achievements, or the ostensible “empathy” she possesses as a result of them, such topics are absolutely irrelevant to her fitness for office. Rather, the real nature of the Constitution, and, thus, its critical importance to the operation of the American nation, must be understood. Only then, can the current political circus be prevented from degenerating into yet another pathetic argument over racial and gender identity politics, which is where the Liberals so desperately need to take it, lest they have to face scrutiny of their seditious aspirations.
It is altogether necessary to recall the real nature of this debate, particularly with ignorance of the American national heritage running so rampant in recent years. No amount of Liberal drivel should be allowed to deflect attention from the enormity of what is at stake for Americans of this generation, and all future generations, if, indeed, they are to inherit an America bearing any similarity to the greatness it once embodied.
Unlike the many venerated pieces of parchment that sit silently under glass in the nation’s museums, the U.S. Constitution is not merely some personal observation from a historic figure, or a collection of profoundly stirring, but narrowly purposed, oratory. The Constitution is the result of an ironclad agreement among the original states, an agreement as to how they would empower a central government to collectively represent them among foreign powers, while assuring an equitable station for each state within the sovereign nation. Only by universally recognizing the Constitution as the fundamental law, supreme law of the nation and, most importantly, abiding by it as such, could America hope to maintain its national character and cohesiveness.
Capricious departures from that formula, even for seemingly noble goals (such as the forcible advancement of racial “equality” through hiring quotas) critically erode the foundation of that nation, and are thus a threat to all Americans. Judicial impartiality and commitment to constitutional boundaries are not only vitally necessary, they are the essence of what a Supreme Court justice should be.
The case must be stridently made that nothing less is acceptable. And, in the hands of a principled opposition political party, this is achievable. It was done in 2005, during the confirmation hearings of Chief Justice John Roberts.
When appearing before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Roberts was questioned by the Liberal Senator Dick Durbin (Democrat - Illinois) as to whether or not he could be counted upon to support the “little guy.” Roberts’ response, while simple and direct enough to be understood by any average citizen, was so powerfully grounded in the real significance of the Constitution that Durbin and many of Roberts' other critics were ever after put on the defensive.
Roberts simply explained that, as a U.S. Supreme Court justice, his purpose was not to favor either the lowly or powerful, but to honestly and impartially apply constitutional principle to their circumstances. Thus, neither could count on a favorable bias from him, but both could expect justice. And the promise of the diligent pursuit of justice for each individual, whether meek or mighty, is the surest guarantee of justice for all. It quickly became evident that, by his succinct response, Roberts had completely redirected the debate back to constitutional premises, not only for his own confirmation, but also during the confirmation of Samuel Alito, who was subsequently appointed to the Supreme Court.
In the afterglow of such a commitment to real equality for all Americans, Sotomayor’s twisted perspective, and the undiluted bitterness it reflects (the true consequence of her life circumstances) can be understood in their petty, poisonous, and ultimately dangerous reality. A racist jurist is a problem, but one who brazenly and unabashedly transforms that racism into “policy,” recklessly administered from the bench, and thereafter backed by the full force of the national government, will ultimately corrupt the character of the nation for every inhabitant.
Legal Issues, Lawyers, & America's Judiciary
U.S. Constitutional Law & Political Philosophy
The Constitution of the United States of America
The Politics of Ethnicity & Race:
Ethnic & Racial Politics in the U.S.A.
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer and staff writer for the New Media Alliance. He lives in southeastern
Wyoming. He has been active in local and state politics for many years and is a managing partner in Best American
Buy (www.bestamericanbuy.com), an e-commerce business that markets products exclusively made in America. His
contact information and archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor