ATTACHING REALITY TO OBAMA'S "SPUTNIK MOMENT"
By Christopher G. Adamo
Only a few weeks back, those on the Left were sanctimoniously condemning Heartland America for its “incivility,” enthusiastically repeating allegations that everyone who supported the U.S. Constitution and the traditions of America was ultimately culpable for the mass murder and mayhem in Tucson, Arizona. However, the flagrant double standards of Liberal commentators, and more significantly the shamelessness and transparency of their attempts to exploit a tragedy in service to their “politically correct” agenda, simply could not withstand the test of time.
So, after a few more derisive denunciations of the harsh rhetoric coming from everyone on the political Right, they completely dropped the subject and returned to their standard excoriations of anyone who might differ in the slightest degree with the ultimate wisdom of everything Liberal. Accusations of vile motives among Conservatives and their callous indifference to “the needy,” along with derisive and fabricated personal attacks against such notables as Sarah Palin, are once again standard Liberal operating procedure, now that the sting of the Tucson episode is fading and no more political hay can be extracted from it.
Eventually, the truth (or, more accurately, the total lack thereof) in Liberal calls for “civility” can be properly weighed against the malignant personal attacks they regularly launch against those on the Right. Thus, their real intentions become apparent. Apart from the transparent efforts to thwart meaningful discussion of the issues of the day (such activity poses a mortal threat to the Liberal agenda), they are no more interested in “civility” than they are in any freedom of speech or thought that might conflict with their goals.
More recently, much of the specific methods and motives of the current Leftist offensive can be gleaned by revisiting Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech, given on January 25, 2011. Were he sincerely endeavoring to fulfill the constitutional requirement to “give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient,” the particular items mentioned could later be referenced for determining the proper direction of the country during the ensuing months and years. But, as is ever more painfully apparent, that simply is not the case.
After the severe refutation that his party and its political philosophy received at the polls last November, Barack Obama realized that it is not too soon to begin the Herculean task of restoring his pretense as an inspiring visionary on which he built his 2008 campaign. But, since that time, he has proven on innumerable occasions that nothing of worthwhile substance is to be found behind that veneer. Far from being the stirring leader and healing agent of a fractured country, he has proven to be among the most petty and divisive high officeholders in the nation’s history.
Thus, it was deemed necessary to use the opportunity of the State of the Union to elevate the country to soaring heights through an allusion to a pivotal milestone from its past. And this is where Barack Obama’s attempt to, once again, demagogue the plight of the people, and recast it in a light that would convince them of the resounding beneficence of his encroaching statism, fell completely flat.
His reference to a new “Sputnik Moment” came across as empty and condescending in January, the moment he spoke it. Now, barely a month later, it redounds almost comically, except that it starkly reflects the manner in which the Obama administration believes it can still dupe, manipulate, and control the people.
In the first place, the real “Sputnik Moment” represented the starting bells of the space race, in which capitalistic America went head-to-head against the obsessive militarism and tyranny of the collectivist Soviet Union. It bears mentioning that, during the dozen years between the 1957 launch of Sputnik, a primitive 183 pound metal ball, and Neil Armstrong’s monumental “Giant leap for mankind” on the lunar soil of the Sea of Tranquility, the Left, Obama’s political camp, remained fixedly invested in America’s failure.
Of equal significance is the fact that when President John F. Kennedy made his legendary 1961 speech committing America to the quest of manned lunar travel before the end of the decade, he established a timetable for his goal which he expected to fall within the term of his Presidency. At the time of the speech, he well anticipated remaining in the White House until January of 1969. And while historical upheavals in Dallas in 1963 and at Cape Canaveral in the Apollo fire of 1967 changed all that, Kennedy had clearly intended to see the program through to a quantifiable success.
Not so with Obama’s new “Sputnik Moment.” In pathetic contrast, he claims to envision an infrastructure of government-mandated milestones, ostensibly enacted in service to the environment. Yet, these reach out to 2035, at which time he assures us that the country will generate eighty percent of its energy from “clean energy sources,” while we will be enjoying our travels on high speed rail. Meanwhile, he continues his needless and ultimately dangerous moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
Needless to say, he will be long gone from the White House by then, leaving America with more massive and needless debt, its resources mindlessly squandered on a quest to address a bogus climate-change “crisis” that is daily proving to be completely without merit. Of course, none of his oratory is meant to be considered from the standpoint of America’s circumstances. Its purpose was solely to rouse the crowds on speech night. And with that event in the past, he should be pardoned from any promises that transpired there.
Ultimately, the entire discourse bore no more connection to reality than his former (and future) promises to lower the sea level, reduce debt, end the rancor, and build the economy. In a time of deep crisis for this nation’s finances and international standing, and with future prospects on those fronts in grave doubt, something of far greater substance and consequence is needed. But for the next two years at least, we can expect more of the same.
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism
Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state
level for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor