WHY 2012 MAY BE STARKLY DIFFERENT FROM 1996
By Christopher G. Adamo
As recently as last month, it appeared that Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, the epitome of an “establishment Republican,” would be promoted from within as the Republican Party nominee in next year’s presidential race. In the Congress, Republican Speaker John Boehner rolled over for the Democrats in a pathetic capitulation on the Federal Budget. The New York District 26 special election went to Democrat Kathy Hochul, though a Republican had won it with a solid majority only six months ago. And in the wake of the successful attack on Osama bin Laden, a sycophantic press incessantly declared President Barack Obama politically invulnerable as he commenced his campaign for a second presidential term.
Not surprisingly, comparisons are being made to the political comeback and “landslide” 1996 re-election of Liberal/Democratic President Bill Clinton, given that his Presidency had similarly appeared to be on the ropes in the wake of the Conservative/Republican mid-term tsunami that occurred in 1994. After all, if Bill Clinton and the Democratic Party could make so dramatic of a comeback in only two years, why not Barack Obama and the Democratic Party? It is therefore very useful to the interests of the Liberal Democrats to draw as much of a parallel as possible to those years, since the end game would mean re-election for Obama.
However, such displays of Liberal Democratic jubilance are a bit premature, to put it mildly. Most present-day “analyses” of what actually happened in the 1996 presidential election are flagrant examples of history revision, bearing little or no connection to reality (admittedly a standard symptom of the Liberal condition). And the current ebb and flow of political forces are so drastically unlike those of the mid 1990s that the actualities of that period can in no way be invoked as harbingers of what may befall America in the next seventeen months.
For starters, in contrast to all of the media efforts to characterize the 1996 presidential contest as a “mandate” for Bill Clinton, he never enjoyed a decisive re-election victory. Despite the fervent efforts of the Clinton campaign to boost his popularity, he received less than half of one of the smallest voter turnouts in seven decades. Furthermore, the vote against him was divided, deliberately so, by the involvement of Ross Perot, who garnered eight percent, thus ensuring that Republican Bob Dole would lose. So, while Clinton did indeed achieve a second term, it was certainly not by a “landslide.”
Far more pertinent to today’s circumstances, however, are the factors that are lining up against the hopes of Obama and the Democrats. Whether their outlandish actions of 2009 and 2010 were motivated by a psychotic blindness to reality, combined with a devotion to Leftist ideologies, or whether they were the intentional and malevolent deeds of a cabal of anti-Americans intent on destroying the greatness of this country, may, in the longrun, prove to be irrelevant. The end result is that the Obama/Liberal Democratic agenda has been disastrous for America, and the people on Mainstreet clearly know it.
In the wake of the 1994 elections, with Republicans in control of both houses of Congress, the Liberal onslaught from the Clintons was in seemingly check and the looming threat of Hillarycare rapidly dissipating, America believed it could heave a sigh of relief and forget its troubles. This situation allowed the opportunistic Clinton political machine to pontificate on the utopia that might have been, while repositioning the President as a “Centrist” by such disingenuous deeds as his signing of welfare reform in the waning days of the 1996 campaign. And, with the national economy responding positively to the fiscal prudence of the Republican Congress and Senate, Americans were once again beginning to feel good about their country and their prospects for the future.
This, along with the clearly half-hearted embrace of Conservatism by Republican challenger Bob Dole, afforded Clinton an ability to appeal to the mainstream of America. In the end, while never garnering an electoral majority, he still managed to claim more votes than Dole, and, on such meager terms, he achieved re-election.
But, if Barack Obama and his band of Chicago political operatives believe they can replay those days, they are in for a rude awakening. America in 2011 is drastically different from what it was in 1995. The heavy-handed methods employed by Obama, along with Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (Democrat - Nevada) and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Democrat - California) in their drive to impose socialized medicine on the nation were ultimately successful in achieving their goal. But such tactics will not be soon forgotten. And, unlike Hillary’s attempt to nationalize medicine, Obamacare did not merely threaten America, it was implemented through sordid and blatantly unconstitutional means and is now codified as law.
Similarly, the abhorrent “economic” policies of the Obama administration have laid waste to America’s former prosperity. On every front where the Obama regime has successfully infiltrated the marketplace with its Marxist policies, economic devastation is the product. And the country has, thus far, been unable to rid itself of the looming danger and dread that this situation instills in mindful citizens.
In an abominable, but revealing, admission, Dan Akerson, the current CEO of General Motors, who was inarguably installed in his position by Obama, advocates a severe hike in gasoline tax rates in order to boost sales of his company’s line of “green” cars. While professing a desire to be unleashed from federal control, Akerson proves himself an acolyte of statism and an advocate of the worst aspects of a command and control national economy imposed and directed by the U.S. government. And this is the Obama/Liberal/Democratic roadmap to America’s recovery?
Election Day 2012 is still a year and a half away. But the damage to this nation has been so severe and inescapable that no amount of media spin can erase it from the awareness of the people. Americans are in no mood for any continuation of the abominable present course. And the Republican challenger who can credibly make the case for a sweeping departure from that course will surely find widespread and heartfelt support from across the nation.
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism
Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state level
for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor