THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIII, Issue # 218, September 3, 2011
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

"MUSLIM RADICALIZATION": IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER
By Raymond Ibrahim

IS THERE AN ESTABLISHED, UNIVERSALLY AGREED-UPON MEANING OF THE TERM "MUSLIM RADICALIZATION," OR "RADICALIZED MUSLIM"?  IS THERE A UNIVERSAL STANDARD OF NORMALCY OR MODERATION THAT ALL PEOPLE, MUSLIM & NON-MUSLIM, WESTERNER & NON-WESTENER, ADHERE TO?  THE FAILURE OF MANY OBSERVERS & COMMENTATORS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT MUCH OF WHAT PEOPLE BELIEVE IS GOOD OR BAD, RIGHT OR WRONG, & MODERATE OR EXTREME, IS A PRODUCT OF THEIR CULTURALLY-INDUCED WORLDVIEW
FULL STORY:   Because the phrase "Muslim radicalization" has become increasingly popular in American discourse, it behooves us to establish once and for all what it means. Without an agreed upon definition, it may be that we are each talking about different things or worse and more likely, nothing at all.

Most dictionaries define "radicalization" and "radicalize" as "to make radical." The word "radical" especially in a socio-political context means "extreme," "fundamental"; as a noun it means "a person who holds or follows strong convictions or extreme principles; extremist."

For our purposes, then, a "Muslim radical" is someone "who holds or follows strong [Muslim] convictions or extreme principles."

This definition, which is likely what most people mean by "Muslim radicalization," is fraught with problems and loaded assumptions. For example, who decides which Muslim convictions or principles are "extreme" or "radical," and which are not?

Yet, some Westerners talk about "Muslim radicalization" as if there was a base of normalcy that all people are agreed to that there is a line that, once crossed, both Muslims and non-Muslims agree is "radicalized" behavior.

But is that the case? Is there a universal standard that all people Muslim and non-Muslim, Westerner and non-Westerner adhere to? In fact, while there are certain commonalities, so too are there extreme that is, "radical" variations inherent to each culture or civilization. The notion that "radicalization" refers to something universally agreed to fails to take into account that much of what people believe is good or bad, right or wrong and, yes, moderate or extreme is a product of their culturally-induced worldview, a product of their epistemology.

As any anthropologist can attest, there are entire cultures and societies that engage in what we would term "radical" behavior, even though, to them, such behavior is quite normal. Indeed, if we agree that "radicalization" refers to extreme views or practices, to many cultures, the West from its gender neutrality to its secular humanism is "radical."

Let us agree, then, that radical behavior to a Muslim, Western normalization of homosexuality, to a Westerner, Muslim killing of apostates is in the eye of the beholder. Once this view is adopted, the inevitable becomes clear: "Muslim radicalization" is simply another way of saying "distinctly Muslim principles."

Consider Saudi Arabia. Its entire worldview and culture from totally veiled women to draconian punishments such as stoning is "extreme" by Western standards. Yet, to the average Saudi, such behavior, built atop millennium-old Sharia principles, is not only normal but moderate (the late Usama bin Laden used to boast that Sharia is the most "moderate" system). Simultaneously, Saudis look to the Western life style and see it as corrupt, debauched, or, in a word radical.

Many may argue that "Wahhabi" Saudi Arabia is an anomaly and not representative of the average Muslim's worldview or culture. But there are important rebuttals to this mainstream view.

First, buzz words such as "Wahhabism" (and "Salafism") are somewhat misleading: they imply a new aberration in Islam. Yet, Wahhabism's message that Muslims need to return to purely Islamic principles has existed centuries before Ibn Wahhab walked the earth in the Eighteenth Century. One example: the classic and influential Muslim jurist Ibn Hanbal, who lived in the Eighth century one thousand years before Wahhab insisted on the same exact "radical" teachings.

Moreover, the Wahhabi/Salafist worldview permeates Muslim thinking around the globe, if for no other reason than that Saudi-produced religious literature and programming part and parcel of Saudi funding saturates the Muslim market and media, including in Europe and in America. Such is the double-whammy: while Saudi literature "radicalizes" Muslims in America, Saudi "donations" help undermine America's knowledge of the threat.

Yet, we continue to hear Western politicians casually talking about "de-radicalizing" Muslims. This is no different than, say, Chinese politicians casually talking about "de-radicalizing" de-Westernizing Western peoples, so that they can stop thinking and acting in a distinctly Western way.

Therefore, rather than arrogantly brushing aside Islam's centuries-old worldview which, at root, is behind any talk of "de-radicalizing" Muslims Western leaders would do well to take the time to learn the particulars of the religion.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three    Page Two    Page One

Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors

American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East

International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security

   Page Two    Page One

Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.

Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization

Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies

Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security

U.S. National Security Strategy



Raymond Ibrahim, a historian of Islam, Islamism and the Middle East, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, an Associate Director of the Middle East Forum, a guest lecturer at the National Defense Intelligence College, and the editor of The Al-Qa'ida Reader, a collection of tranlations of key texts and documents of the Islamist movement. Ibrahim's translations of the religious texts and political propaganda comprising this collection help readers comprehend the origins, development, history, and serious danger of the Islamist war doctrines of Usama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, the Founders of Al-Qa'ida.


The foregoing article by Raymond Ibrahim was originally published in Jihad Watch, September 1, 2011, and can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum, a foreign policy think tank which seeks to define and promote American interests in the Middle East, defining U.S. interests to include fighting radical Islam, working for Palestinian Arab acceptance of the State of Israel, improving the management of U.S. efforts to promote constitutional democracy in the Middle East, reducing America's energy dependence on the Middle East, more robustly asserting U.S. interests vis--vis Saudi Arabia, and countering the Iranian threat. (URL: http://www.meforum.org/3030/muslim-radicalization)


Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
September 3, 2011




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIII, 2011


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity