THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIII, Issue # 236, September 21, 2011
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
RICK PERRY VERSUS MITT ROMNEY:
THE POLITICAL "HORSERACE"
By Christopher G. Adamo
MITT ROMNEY AS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA'S PREFERRED REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN THE NOVEMBER,
2012, GENERAL ELECTION CONTEST: ROMNEY'S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY & THE LIBERAL LEFTIST ADVANTAGE THAT
THE PHILOSOPHY PORTENDS IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION -- HOW THE ONGOING LIBERAL AGENDA IS LIKELY TO BE
HELPED -- HOW THE OTHER GOP PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDERS WEAKENED THEMSELVES FOR THE EVENTUAL SHOWDOWN
WITH LIBERAL DEMOCRAT & INCUMBENT PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
FULL STORY:
It would be a mistake to believe that the “mainstream” media and press are only interested in boosting ratings as they play
up the contest between Texas Governor Rick Perry and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney in their quest for the
Republican presidential nomination. While increased viewership is a definite “plus,” their ultimate concern is the
re-election of Barack Hussein Obama. And they have made it abundantly clear that Romney would be their preferred GOP
candidate in a general election race.
Romney’s political philosophy bears a far stronger resemblance to that of Arizona Senator John McCain than does the
thinking or track record of Perry. And this portends two possibilities for a Liberal advantage. First, if Romney were to win
next November, his frequently vacillating past stances on major defining issues would pose far less of a threat to the
ongoing Liberal agenda than Perry’s blunt and intransigent opposition to ideas with which he disagrees. Secondly, the
mere fact that Romney bears so much baggage in this department makes him a far less formidable candidate than Perry.
But, while the Leftists clearly know this, their ostensibly objective mouthpieces are determined to paint a distorted picture
for the American public.
So, with each passing day, another attempt is made to chip away a little more of Perry’s initial momentum. Eventually, his
Liberal opponents hope they can sufficiently undermine him and neutralize his campaign, thus leaving the frontrunner
spot open to Romney. Unfortunately, the entire field of Republican candidates is essentially participating in this ploy,
apparently unaware that the nomination is in all likelihood already settled on one of these two. The realities of last week’s
Florida debate, which devolved into a free-for-all almost entirely directed at Perry, reflect a dangerous myopia among
virtually all of the other contenders.
In truth, the longterm damage may have been done to themselves and not their intended target. The actions of those
candidates made them appear petty and even lacking in their own merit, and the orchestrated nature of the onslaught
served to reveal their own weaknesses. Each of Perry’s antagonists focused on a particular flaw in his past record or
governing philosophy. Yet, on an individual basis, they each just as stridently avoided certain controversial areas,
thereby telling volumes about themselves.
Michele Bachmann relentlessly focused on Perry’s admittedly misbegotten effort to vaccinate young girls against the
human papilloma virus (HPV). In the end however, her actions appeared excessive and gratuitous. How many times can
one play “gotcha,” repeatedly directing the discussion back to a single action which Perry readily admits was a mistake?
Clearly, her aim was not to alert the public of a looming danger, but to garner as much political advantage as possible
from the situation.
In stark contrast, Bachmann was comparatively delicate around Perry’s “Ponzi scheme” characterization of Social
Security. While taking a few pot shots, she avoided denigration of Perry’s strident descriptor, since Bachmann is herself
regularly criticized for being overly provocative in her comments on key issues. Instead, she allowed that duty to fall to
Romney, who was likewise careful not to direct too much attention towards the HPV controversy, since he well knows
that a single overreaching executive order by the Texas Governor is far more easily forgivable than the methodical
destruction of personal liberty represented by Romneycare, and the Pandora’s box it helped to open, Obamacare.
Significantly, Bachmann was joined by former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, who likewise decried the excessive
nature of Perry’s HPV vaccination debacle. Yet, Santorum never approached the often repeated criticism of Perry for
having supported the presidential candidacy of Al Gore two decades ago. Santorum would certainly not want the topic
of past political alliances to go full circle, which would inevitably evoke discussions of his own support for the infamous
Pennsylvania Senate RINO (since turned Democrat…officially) Arlen Specter.
From the onset of the debate, it was clear that the object of the entire production was not to learn what beliefs the
Republican candidates upheld, or how their guiding principles might play out, if one of them were to win the election
next Fall. Instead, the whole focus was how to cut into Perry’s current lead. And any lingering doubts that this might be
the case were thoroughly dispelled in the ensuing days since the debate, with one “news story” after another
trumpeting a possible dissipation of Perry’s momentum, only occasionally peppered with grudging concessions of the
significant lead he nonetheless retains. In the same vein, polls showing that Romney might be gaining on him are
jubilantly and prominently reported.
Unfortunately for the Republican contenders and America in general, the net result of the debate was to make Perry’s
detractors look small. Their willingness to resort to the standard Liberal media tactics and double standards shows an
ominous alignment with current-day “ruling class” thinking from inside the Beltway that is fundamentally at odds with
Heartland America. In the process, they undermined and trivialized the entire Conservative groundswell of the past two
years, which is an enormous price to pay for the possibility of merely getting “one up” on Perry.
America has already reaped the grim results of a presidential election decided with no more regard for its consequences
than an episode of American Idol. It would be a crying shame for the Republicans to respond by making their
determination of a nominee in a manner reflective of the reality show “Survivor.”
Admittedly, this chain of events could redound to Romney’s benefit, at least in the shortterm. Having gained five
points against Perry, according to some polls, the Massachusetts Governor presents by far the most likely candidate to
be frontrunner in the event that Perry’s popularity dissipates. And this would suit the political establishment and their
media minions just fine.
A Perry Presidency constitutes an opportunity to fundamentally steer America back from the abyss of Socialism and
cultural collapse. At best, Mitt Romney in the White House would represent a “time out,” after which Liberalism could
pick up its agenda slightly delayed, but ultimately unabated. Leftists would caterwaul in either case, but they know that,
in the longrun, they could far more easily recuperate from the latter.
The end game will be next November’s showdown with Obama. The time to start considering that eventuality is now.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
American Politics, Political Competition, & the Control of
Public Policy: Elections, Political Parties, Political Factions,
Ideologies, & Special Interest Groups
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
-------------------------
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY & POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES:
COMPETING SYSTEMS OF POLITICAL THOUGHT
Conservatism
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Liberalism
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism
Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state
level for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIII, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity