THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIV, Issue # 94, May 2, 2012
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

THE U.S. VICE PRESIDENT:
Myths & Misguided "Conventional Wisdom"
By Christopher G. Adamo

THE 2012 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION & THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR VICE PRESIDENT:  WHO WILL PRESUMED REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE MITT ROMNEY CHOOSE AS HIS VICE PRESIDENTIAL RUNNING MATE? THE BAD ADVICE BEING OFFERED BY REPUBLICAN PARTY PLAYERS OPERATING UNDER WHOLLY WRONGHEADED PRESUMPTIONS & EXHIBITING A TOTAL LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF THE POTENTIAL TO NEGATIVELY IMPACT ON THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN -- THE LIKELYHOOD THAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA WILL JETTISON JOSEPH BIDEN & CHOOSE A CONSIDERABLY MORE RADICAL LIBERAL LEFTIST TO BE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN THE 2012 ELECTION -- THE EXTREME INSTABILITY OF THE CURRENT POLITICAL CLIMATE IN THE U.S.A., & THE CRITICAL NEED TO FULLY GRASP THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS SITUATION -- THE STANDARD BELIEF OF MANY GOP INSIDERS THAT BOTH MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES BASICALLY OPERATE IN A SIMILAR MANNER, ONLY DIFFERING IN THEIR POLICY AGENDA PREFERENCES -- HOW SUCH AN ASSUMPTION ON THE PART OF REPUBLICANS LEADS TO DISASTER FOR THE PARTY & ITS CANDIDATES
FULL STORY:   The nation has now reached that milestone of the presidential campaign in which major speculation is taking place regarding the choice of a running mate for presumed Republican nominee Mitt Romney. And, while the ultimate decision will, of course, fall to Romney, a great deal of bad advice is being offered by party players operating under wholly wrongheaded presumptions and exhibiting a total lack of understanding of the potential to negatively impact the campaign.

Across the political aisle, the political winds of the 2012 campaign cycle are such that an admittedly small possibility exists that Barack Obama might feel compelled to jettison Joseph R. Biden, Jr., his current Vice-President, and opt for a more suitable alternative. Of course, in most peoples’ minds, the principal contender is Hillary Clinton. And, even if such conjecture is proven to be completely baseless, it is nonetheless illustrative of the extreme instability of the current political climate, and the critical need to fully grasp its significance.

For starters, the standard belief among too many GOP insiders is that both camps basically operate in a similar manner, only differing in their agenda preferences. However, nothing could be further from the truth. Historically, it has been disastrous for Republicans to make such an assumption, and the repercussions would be no less dire in this election cycle.

All too often, this foolish supposition leads to transparent pandering and the spewing of empty promises, which only spawn cynicism and disillusionment among the targeted group of potential voters. Overwhelmingly, the dubious prospect of trifles bestowed from Washington, D.C., is not something to which those on the political Right aspire. Rather, they seek the implementation of sound policy and the general improvement of the condition of the nation, which will not afford them offerings from Washington, but expands their opportunities to operate under their own initiative and thus better themselves.

It should be of no consequence to the Republican candidate that his Liberal opponents enjoy success when engaging in the virtual purchase of votes by promising the direct return of “benefits” from government coffers. The connection between Democratic Party leaders and their voting constituency is starkly different from the relationship between grassroots Conservatives and aspiring Republican contenders.

Even more significantly, the contrast in motivating principles between the political Right and the political Left imposes limitations on Republican candidates which, if ignored, result in significant voter alienation. All too often, the Democratic Party candidate triumphs not from a superior platform or greater appeal to the electorate, but simply because the insipidness of a Republican campaign run on the premise of “moderation” and “appealing to the middle” so thoroughly dissipates voter enthusiasm.

The historical case in point, which should never be forgotten, is the actuality of the electoral “success” of former President Bill Clinton. Venerated in the present day and lauded by a sycophantic Liberal press, Clinton was never the political wizard that his revisionist cronies now assert him to have been. In both of his elections, he received less than fifty percent of some of the lowest overall voter turnouts in the past eight decades. Yet, he won his races nonetheless, simply because his Republican opponents generated even less enthusiasm among the voting base.

So, where does the choice of a nominee’s running mate fit into all of this? Again, the manner in which a Republican can motivate the electorate by virtue of a particular nomination is markedly different from that of a Democrat. And that difference goes to the root of the growing divide between the methods and guiding principles of voters who comprise the two major parties.

In 2012, it is difficult to truly assign a set of guiding precepts to the “typical Democrat.” Rather, the party is made up of a collection of special interest groups, each of which sees an opportunity to advance its own agenda through access to federal power and, more importantly, federal dollars. In such an environment, wholly disparate groups can seemingly come together, since each will stand to reap its own share from the federal trough. As a result, a vice-presidential candidate who is starkly at odds with the head of the ticket can essentially lure a broader mix of voters into the ticket than one who holds a more limited philosophical perspective.

Outside of the Beltway, the GOP voting base is eminently different in nature. It consists of a coalition of people who ascribe to a common set of values that are overwhelmingly reflective of the nation’s traditions and the Judeo-Christian ethic. These Americans hold fast to such attributes as patriotism, in its true historical sense, along with a veneration of the American ideal and the promises it portends for those who pursue it. Consequently, they are largely immune to the allure of a vice-presidential candidate whose place at the table represents a token inroad for some particular subgroup. And, in contrast to the splintered special interests that comprise Liberal America, such constituencies are neither a fringe nor a faction. Rather, they are the backbone of the Conservative movement.

In contrast to the methodology of the political Left, the worth of the Republican Party ticket will be the sum total of the principles and ideals which it can believably be expected to uphold and advance. Thus, the presidential nominee’s appeal will not be strengthened, but only diluted, by the choice of a running mate who ascribes to a different set of core values. Efforts at “broadening the base” by nominating such an individual will essentially reduce the credibility of the ticket to only those issues on which both candidates share a commonality of views.

In light of this, the most worthy approach, and also the most politically advantageous, would be to reassert the original purpose of the Vice-Presidency, which, according to the U.S. Constitution was to ensure a continuation of a particular administration, and thus the continuity of the nation’s governance, in the event that the President was unable to complete the term of office. In this simple and honorable manner, candidate Romney by a prudent choice of a running mate could reassure the nation of his sincerity while solidifying confidence in the Conservative principles to which he has professed allegiance, and which are so desperately needed to bring about national restoration.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
American Politics, Political Competition, & the Control of
Public Policy: Elections, Political Parties, Political Factions,
Ideologies, & Special Interest Groups

American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership

The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.

The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media

Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics


POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY & POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES:
COMPETING SYSTEMS OF POLITICAL THOUGHT
Conservatism

Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers

Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status

Constitutional Conservatism: American & British

Liberalism

Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations

Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism

Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism

Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"

Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies

Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism



Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state level for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIV, 2011


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity