THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume III, Issue # 15, October 19, 2001
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
THE ONWARD MARCH OF MORAL EQUIVALENCE
By Chuck Morse
In a New York Times editorial entitled "Condemnation Without Absolutes," (October 15, 2001), Stanley Fish of the University of Illinois maintains "there can be no independent standard for determining which of many rival interpretations of an event is the true one." What he is saying, in his sophistic intellectual style, is that there is no such thing as absolute morality, only a morality shaped by "interpreters" of an event. Tell that to the families of the 5,000 human beings lying under the rubble of the Twin Towers. They don't need to interpret the morality of an event; it stares each of them in the face every morning when his or her loved one doesn't come down for breakfast.
Fish maintains that what "postmodern thought," a euphemism for neo-Marxist thought, "argues against is the hope of justifying our response to the [terrorist] attacks in universal terms that would be persuasive to everyone, including our enemies." What he's saying is that we have no right to identify evil because someone else might not agree with us. This has always been quite convenient to the political Left, given the fact that, in the name of absolute morality as they define it, they were, according to the Black Book of Communism, responsible for the liquidation of over 100 million people during the twentieth century.
Fish states, "Invoking the abstract notions of justice and truth to support our cause wouldn't be effective because our adversaries lay claim to the same language." He's right, of course, about our adversaries. Adolf Hitler recorded in his diary, a week before he committed suicide, that his treatment of the Jews of Europe was "humane" and his greatest accomplishment. Joseph Stalin justified the show trials of the 1930s by referring to the victims as "enemies of the people" and "social misfits." Eldridge Cleaver stated that the rape of white women was a justifiable political statement.
Fish explains that our adversaries are driven by "reasons and motives and even ...a perverted vision of some virtues." He contradicts himself when he casts absolute moral judgement with his use of the term "perverted." More troubling, he implicitly justifies their actions by explaining that "reasons and motives" in and of themselves justify action, regardless of what those reasons and motives may be. This is what he describes as a "rival interpretation of an event." The criminals and their apologists make no such prevarications; they state their motives clearly. They justify their act of mass murder as part of a jihad against the non-Muslim American great Satan.
Fish takes umbrage over the use of the term "terrorism." He states that the term "is the name of a style or warfare," without identifying the nature of that "style." Terrorism is the targeting of innocent people for murder as a military strategy. When the suicide bomber blew himself up at the pizza parlor in Jerusalem, his goal was to kill innocent people; hence, he committed an act of terror. When Israel retaliated by killing the mastermind behind this act, they engaged in a legitimate and necessary act of self-defense. One action is right, the other is wrong.
Fish has this demented idea that, by judging the perpetrators of the Twin Tower bombing as absolutely evil, we are somehow prevented from understanding their beliefs and motives. Quite the opposite is true. It is critical that we understand the evil that confronts us, in all of its complexities, in order to combat it. It is critical that, as individuals and as a nation, we constantly identify those forces that seek to deprive us of our freedom.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The Threat of Radical Islam
More on the Threat of Radical Islam
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Terrorism & U.S. Homeland Security
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Copyright 2001 SierraTimes.com
Reprinted with Permission from SierraTimes.com
October 17, 2001
SierraTimes.com
URL:
http://www.SierraTimes.com
Return to Top of Page
Go to Previous Article in Series
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume III, 2001
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity