THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume IV, Issue # 30, March 24, 2002
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

HIJACKERS OF REVOLUTIONS
By J.R. Nyquist

Hijack: (1) to steal (goods in transit) by force; (2) to seize control (of an aircraft, etc.), especially to go to a nonscheduled destination. (Webster's NEW WORLD DICTIONARY).

Russia, March 8, 1917: The February Revolution begins. Crises, wars, destruction, and hunger prevail.

Russia, November 6, 1917: The October Revolution begins.

How is that, you ask? How can a February Revolution begin in March and an October Revolution begin in November? There is no mystery because the country is Russia. Its two revolutions are designated by old and new calenders--the old Orthodox calender and the new Western calender. In Russia, there are two revolutions in one year. First, there is the revolution against the Tsar--the revolution which overthrows the Tsarist regime and establishes the Provisional Government. Second, there is the revolution against the Provisional government--the revolution which overthrows the Provisional government and establishes the Soviet government. What are the particulars?

Russia, April 16, 1917: Nikolai Lenin reaches Petrograd (Saint Petersburg) from exile in Switzerland via the "sealed train." He is secretly backed by the German Kaiser's money. He organizes a coup to overthrow the Provisional government and hijack the Russian Revolution. In return for this clandestine German support, Lenin has promised that Russia, once it is under his control, will withdraw from World War I and make peace on German terms.

Russia, November 6, 1917: Lenin and his Bolshevik (Communist) Red Guards seize control and take Russia to a nonscheduled destination--the Communist dictatorship called the "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics."

China, 1912: A national uprising forces the Qing Emperor Xuan Tong to abdicate. The monarchy is abolished and a new regime, a republican government, is formed under the leadership of Dr. Sun Yat-sen. Crises, wars, destruction, and hunger prevail. Warlords rule in the provinces. Generals vie for control of the central government. Japan invades the country. Finally, through years of turmoil, Mao Tse-tung and his Communist Red Guards, with Soviet Russian support, steal the Chinese Revolution, taking China to a nonscheduled destination--the Communist dictatorship called the "People's Republic of China."

The men who hijacked the Russian and Chinese revolutions were profound strategists and students of revolution. They understood that a revolution is an opportunity, that those who are perceptive and prepared, who are cunning and full of artifice, can master the chaos and seize total control.

Before World War II, Soviet dictator Josef Stalin consciously sought to plant the seeds of chaos in Europe that would lead to a great upheaval. Just as the chaos of World War I had produced the revolution that Lenin hijacked, World War II might produce a revolution that Stalin could hijack. Stalin's plan was to support Adolf Hitler. As GRU defector Viktor Suvorov points out, "For Stalin, German Nazism was an instrument which would break a path for revolution through solid ice--an icebreaker." As early as 1927, Stalin said that the "Second Imperialist War" was quite unavoidable. "We shall move [into the war], said Stalin, "but we shall be the last to move, in order to throw our weight on to the scales and tip the balance." (Stalin, Collected Works, Volume 7, page 14).

Ever the keen strategist, Suvorov tells us that, "In Europe, Stalin needed crises, wars, destruction, and hunger. Hitler could achieve all this for him." The more crimes Hitler committed, the greater the harvest for Stalin. As Suvorov relates, "From 1927 onwards, Stalin made every effort to support the Nazis who were then striving for power, although he did not do so publicly."

Nazism was the hangman of Europe, and Stalin intended to pay his hangman and then, according to Stalin's established practice, hang the hangman!

Fast forward to 1967. Stalin's method had won the eastern quadrant of Central Europe for Communism. Now Stalin's successors faced a new challenge. How to defeat the richest, most powerful country in the history of the world--the United States of America.

In September, 1967, Konstantin Katushev, a secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, arrived in Prague to share key aspects of Moscow's "long range plan" with top Communist officials in Czechoslovakia. According to Katushev, the key to winning control of Western Europe and the North American continent would be to bring about the collapse of the American economy. How could this be achieved? Katushev told his Czech comrades that America was a volatile society. The American people could be moved to either political extreme, the extreme Left or the extreme Right. "If we impose on the U.S.A. the external restraints proposed in our Plan, and seriously disrupt the American economy, the working and lower middle classes will suffer the consequences and they will turn on the society that has failed them. They will be ready for revolution." Katushev's colleagues in Moscow told the Czechs that America might reach a "pre-revolutionary situation" around 1990. (Jan Sejna, Ww Will Bury You, London, 1982, page 154.)

Moscow's strategists did not care if the revolution in Anerica originated from the extreme Right of the extreme Left. Just as in World War II (prior to Nazi Germany's surprise attack on and invasion of the Soviet Union), when Stalin supported Hitler, the idea was to create chaos, crises, wars, destruction, and hunger. Through the expert use of force and fraud, the Kremlin could exploit a future upheaval and hijack America. Working to develop the intellectual and clandestine tools required, coming from a political tradition based on stealing power, the strategists of the Kremlin were confident.

"The Soviet strategy for revolutionary war is a global strategy," writes defense expert Joseph D. Douglass, Jr., in his groundbreaking book, Red Cocaine. There were five principal forces that had to be organized in order to bring about Konstantin Katushev's scenario for collapsing the American economy and unleashing revolutionary chaos:

Today, we can see that all the elements for economic sabotage have been assembled. Terrorist networks exist in nearly every country on earth. According to Italian investigators, Russia is now the capital of organized crime. In addition, narcotics trafficking has been used to corrupt and neutralize America's security services and border controls. Money laundering has allowed for the penetration of banks, accounting firms, and major corporations. Not only can terrorists penetrate U.S. borders, but the stage is set for unprecedented looting--in other words economic SABOTAGE.

Now skip ahead to Yugoslavia in the 1990s. In 1967, Katushev and his Soviet colleagues told their Czech underlings that Moscow's plan for Yugoslavia would seek to break the country up along ethnic lines. A generation later, the reason for the breakup was explained to an American soldier in Bosnia during a conversation with a Russian Spetsnaz officer. The Russian, who reportedly spoke English with a Nebraska accent, frankly admitted to the U.S. soldier that the Yugoslav breakup was along the lines of a dress rehearsal. For Russia, the Bosnia affair was a live training exercise to prepare Russian special troops for the future breakup of the United States. This same Russian officer, on learning of the U.S. soldier's contact with American law enforcement, asked for samples of local U.S. patches (perhaps to go with his Nebraska accent).

Now let us skip ahead to April 25, 2000. Convicted Unabomber Ted Kaczynski writes a letter describing his fellow inmate Timothy McVeigh. According to Kaczynski, "McVeigh told me of his idea (which I think may have significant merit) that certain rebellious elements on the American Right and Left, respectively, had more in common with one another than is commonly realized, and that the two groups ought to join forces." (Lou Michel and Dan Herbeck, American Terrorist, New York, 2001, page 493.)

If Stalin were alive today and in full control of Russia, what would he have to say about McVeigh's idea? Would he chuckle to himself and tell his security services to provide clandestine support to Americans who thought like McVeigh? After all, let the Rightwing militias wipe out the Republicans and Democrats. Let them destroy America's political Center. Then Moscow's special troops, with their Nebraska accents, could arrive on the scene and hijack yet another revolution--the Final Revolution.

America, 2005: Terrorism and military crises lead to economic collapse and and a national uprising forcing the U.S. national government to abdicate. A new government is formed under militia leaders X, Y, and Z. Wars, destruction. and hunger prevail. Warlords rule in the provinces (i.e., the former states and regions of former states). Generals vie for control of the national government. China invades the country. Finally, after years of turmoil, the revolution is stolen after a series of missile strikes from abroad. America is taken to a nonscheduled destination--the socalled "People's Democratic Republic of North America."

Tell me it isn't possible.

Copyright 2002 SierraTimes.com



Reprinted with Permission from SierraTimes.com
March 18, 2002

SierraTimes.com
URL:
http://www.SierraTimes.com





Return to Top of Page

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume IV, 2002


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity