THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume IV, Issue # 63, May 7, 2002
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

THE UNITED NATIONS:  IRRELEVANT & MALIGNANT
By Alan Caruba

The United States of America, with a population in excess of 287 million people, has only one vote in the United Nations General Assembly. There are 188 other members of the United Nations, each enjoying representation in the General Assembly. Of these, 130 member nations have rather small populations, each with less than 13 million people, a population less than that of the American State of Florida. In the General Assembly, the vote of each of these 130 members is equal to the vote cast by the U.S.A.

It gets worse. In the U.N., there are 31 nation-states with extremely small populations, each having a population of less that a half million (less people than our least populated State, Wyoming), but entitled to a full vote in decisions of the General Assembly. Each of these U.N. member nations has the same voting power as the U.S.A., China, India, Russia, Great Britain, Japan, or any other major power in the world. Indeed, fourteen nations, each with fewer than 100,000 people, has a vote equal to America's. These fourteen nations include Tuvalu (10,836), San Marino (26,937), and Liechtenstein (31,130).

The real power is in the United Nations Security Council, composed of five permanent members, plus ten temporary members elected for two-year terms. The five permanent members are the U.S.A., Great Britain, France, Russia, and China. Among these permanent members, only the U.S.A. has been highly resistant to the trend toward State Socialism and other forms of Statism, i.e., centralized control and direction of economic activity, control and direction of the nation's economy by the central/national government, acting as agent or instrument of the sovereign state. All of the other permament members of the Security Council have, in varying degrees, succumbed to forces pushing for establishment and operation of government controlled and directed economies--command economies, rather than free market economies. In the United Nations and its organs and agencies, the U.S.A. is virtually alone among a multitude of Statists, an island of free market Capitalism in a sea of Collectivism.

There is one question no one has been able to answer for me. As regards the word "security" in the name of the U.N. Security Council, how much security has the United Nations provided the world since the inception of the U.N. in 1947?

The U.N. Charter says that the organization exists to "save succeeding generations from the scourage of war ... to practice tolerance and live together in peace as good neighbors, to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security." This malignancy that passes for an international organization devoted to fostering peace and a bunch of other noble ideals has proven to be utterly useless and totally irrelevant, except as a threat to constitutional democracy, freedom, and justice everywhere.

These days, the U.N. is totally devoted to transforming itself into a global government, essentially ending the sovereignty of all member and nonmember nations through a matrix of treaties, conferences, and protocols. The U.N. has its hand in all aspects of life on Earth from trade to the environment. It wants the right to tax everyone, to have its own judicial system, and its own military capability. If it has its way, you will be saluting the U.N. flag, not the Stars and Stripes.

Founded after World War II, the United Nations was built on a rotten foundation by a rotten element. The architects of the U.N. were secret agents of the Soviet Union, working at the highest levels within the U.S. Department of State. The first interim Secretary General of the U.N. was none other than Alger Hiss, who went to jail for lying about the fact that he was a Soviet agent. The U.N. has never had a Secretary General who wasn't a dedicated Socialist.

The first major conflict that broke out after World War II was the Korean War, which resulted from the 1950 invasion by Communist-controlled North Korea of South Korea, an ally of the U.S.A. U.S. troops are still stationed in South Korea, more than a half-century after the U.S.A. and its allies, operating as a socalled "United Nations Police Action," drove the North Koreans and the Red Chinese army back behind the 38th. parallel. Frankly, there isn't enough room to recount all the other socalled United Nations' efforts to restore and maintain the pease that weren't totally dependent on the military and economic might of the U.S.A. for success in achieving any resolution of the conflict.

The five wars waged by the Arabs against the State of Israel are a testimony to the U.N.'s ability and willingness to look the other way when a member nation is fighting for its life. There is no single organization in the world that is more anti-Semitic than the United Nations. Its conference "against" racism, held in Durban, South Africa, last year, was such a horror of racism, mostly aimed at Israel, that the U.S.A. withdrew its representatives. Between 1967 and 1988, there were 88 Security Council resolutions passed against Israel and not one criticizing a single Arab nation or the PLO. In that same time span, the U.N. General Assembly passed 429 anti-Israel resolutions.

In the years since the United Nations was founded, there have been appalling genocides in Asia and Africa.

When the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were attacked by Al-Qa'ida terrorists on September 11, 2001, the U.S.A. did not go to the U.N. General Assembly to ask permission to respond. It sent its military to Afghanistan to decimate this threat. The U.S.A. had learned the lesson of earlier wars during the post-World War II era, wars in which the U.S.A. and its allies operated under U.N. resolutions and were not permitted to complete the job of destroying the enemy and eliminating its threat to the peace and security of the world.

After its military defeat at the hands of the U.S.A. and its allies in the Persian Gulf War, the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, failing to cooperate with the U.N. inspectors searching for weapons of weapons of mass destruction, finally ordered them to leave Iraq, and the U.N. cravenly withdrew its inspection teams. No one seems to be too upset by this, except, of course, those of us who keep calling for the complete withdrawal by the U.S.A. from the United Nations. This perfectly sane response to what is clearly an evil organization invariably earns us the knee-jerk nomenclature of "extreme Rightwingers."

What is "extreme" about opposing an institution that has not only utterly failed to bring about peace, has made no impact on the abuse of human rights around the world, and which poses a threat to our Republic? The United Nations is an international malignancy, undermining free societies everywhere, a platform for racism, a mechanism seeking to transfer the wealth of industrialized nations to those that do not foster any economic growth of their own.

Remember that the next time a U.S. ambassador to the United Nations casts our one vote in the General Assembly at the same time as Djibouti.

Alan Caruba is the founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. At the Center's Internet site, http://www.anxietycenter.com, Caruba writes a weekly column, WARNING SIGNS. He is also author of A POCKET GUIDE TO MILITART ISLAM and THE UNITED NATIONS VS. THE UNITED STATES.

Copyright 2002 Alan Caruba



Reprinted with Permission from SierraTimes.com
May 29, 2002

SierraTimes.com
URL:
http://www.SierraTimes.com





Return to Top of Page

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume IV, 2002


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity