THE CBS MINISERIES ON THE REAGAN PRESIDENCY:
BLATANT LEFTWING LIBERAL POLITICAL PROPAGANDA
By Geoff Metcalf
Traditionally, networks try to walk the razors edge in offering programming that pushes the envelope while concurrently remaining "sensitive" to whom they offend. The ultimate objective is to acquire the largest audience. Audience, after all, is REALLY the product, not the program or the star. It is the audience that is sold to sponsors. Sponsors are "buying" the audience to whom they deliver their sales pitch. It is counter in- tuitive, and professionally disastrous, to choose "edgy" over reason. Careers are made and lost over the delicate balance of how far networks can push the envelope before reaching the point of diminishing return.
CBS was about to permit a sycophant political philosophy and prejudice to blowback into potentially epic negative consequences.
The Reagan miniseries, according to the New York Times and Matt Drudge, is less a "history" and much more a Leftwing hatchet job on a much loved Conservative icon.
The monumental bad judgment of the CBS brass is compounded by the tragic fact that the subject of their revisionist vitriol has Alzheimer's and is dying.
Since Ronald Reagan (the personification of Conservative values and principles) is incapable of defending himself, CBS forced the legions of those who respect and admire the man to do the heavy lifting--and they did.
In the International Herald Tribune, Jim Rutenberg noted "that this deconstruction of his Presidency is shot through a Liberal lens, exaggerating his foibles and giving short shrift to his accomplishments."
Already there have been efforts to organize boycotts of CBS and those businesses that choose to advertise in the mean-spirited revisionist effort to denigrate the Reagans.
This is NOT censorship or armchair programming. It is market reality. CBS most certainly can put whatever they want on the air. It is their candy store. However, they cannot compel audiences to watch. And there are consequences to things we do and don't do.
It is impossible to present an entertainment product that will not offend "somebody." The objective (usually) is to attract the most number of likely prospects for whatever product is being advertised. However, when the vehicle becomes so contentious as to drive away audience AND advertisers, the negative consequences "should" outweigh the "creative" desire to proselytize.
The collection of personalities connected with this project precluded any possibility of an evenhanded, objective chronicling of the Reagans. Obviously, however, the objective was never to recount history but to excoriate the living symbol of the producers' philosophic wrath.
Hollywood, Barbara Streisand, and the producers Neil Meron and Craig Zadan loathe Ronald Reagan. CBS Chairman Les Moonves (Clinton buddy) is ultimately responsible. Reagan is anathema to the Liberal sycophant gospel. Notwithstanding protestations to the contrary, the pretentious "politically correct" dogma of the Left remains systemic at CBS.
It is significant to note the film was vetted and approved by CBS lawyers and the suits at Sony Pictures Television. This is not a covert hit piece by producers in thrall of Barbara Streisand.
Ronald Reagan was not and is not a perfect man. However, he was a remarkable man who achieved remarkable things. The net results of his long life is extraordinary and should be acknowledged. Rather, (no pun intended) CBS had chosen to diminish an icon, apparently, to accommodate a political ideology that remains antithesis to a magnificent legacy.
In an effort to defend the indefensible, producer Meron said: "This is not a vendetta, this is not revenge. It is about telling a good story in our honest sort of way. We all believe it's a story that should be told." That quote has to be the most disingenuous, duplicitous crock of excrement since Bill Clinton said; "I did not have sex with that woman."
The New York Times noted, "some involved in the making of the movie said that they were girding for a considerable outcry from some of Reagan's more die-hard support- ers." THAT is grossly inadequate a means of articulating what happened--and should have happened. Not just "more die-hard supporters" were outraged. Even Leftwing die-hards have acknowledged, "it is a hit piece", "payback time", and "this could hurt Democrats more than the Gray Davis recall."
The Reagan miniseries is a "Kill Bill" without the hacked off body parts. It is petty, mean-spirited character assassination and it demands vengeance.
CBS has every right to do whatever they want. However, they are a public company with a responsibility to a board of directors with a responsibility to shareholders. Expect advertisers to seek "the greater part of valor" and disengage from the controversy.
"Heavens Gate" once brought down a film studio. "The Reagans" has the potential of significantly impacting on the entire November sweeps for CBS.
Yes, payback IS a bitch! There ARE consequences!
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, & Other Leftists
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
Conservative Political & Cultural Organizations
American Government & the U.S. Presidency
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor