WHAT THE WEST CASE DEMONSTRATES:
BUREAUCRACTIC RIGIDITY & POOR JUDGEMENT PERMEATE
GOVERNMENT, & EVEN THE MILITARY IS AFFLICTED
& HAS ITS PRIORITIES WRONG
By Nicholas G. Jenkins
Apparently not so in the Army, where Lieutenant Colonel Allen B. West faces an Article 32 hearing, possible court
martial, and up to eight years in prison because he fired
a gun to frighten an Iraqi resister into spilling the beans about attacks on American forces. Colonel West’s methods saved American lives (including, quite possibly, his own), but the process-obsessed Army doesn’t appear to care. What insanity.
What happened is this. In August, Iraqi guerrillas attacked members of the colonel's unit in northern Iraq. American soldiers detained an Iraqi policeman who helped plan the attack and interrogated him (unsuccessfully) for several hours. Colonel West then took over the questioning and, to put a little fear of Allah into the detainee, twice dis- charged his nine millimeter handgun. He fired the shots away from the prisoner but evidently they did the trick, because soon thereafter the Iraqi not only gave up the names of three guerillas involved in the attack, but revealed details of an impending sniper attack as well. The shooting was forgotten about until Army investigators got wind of it during a climate-command investigation of the brigade, at which point the 42-year old African-American was charged with one count of aggravated assault. His choice–leave the Army now and lose retirement benefits, or potentially face a court martial.
Now I wouldn’t advise wielding a rod during interrogations, especially if the goal is to obtain a confession that will hold up in an American court. But an Article 32 hearing? A possible court martial? Up to eight years in prison? Forced retirement? No way.
Fact is, Colonel West got the job done. He obtained the names of three Iraqi guerillas who had already attacked American forces and learned about a planned sniper attack– all invaluable pieces of information. Knowing all this undoubtedly saved American lives (and probably some Iraqi lives, too). Last I checked, saving lives of Americans is what American soldiers are supposed to do.
I’m guessing the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Human Rights Watch, and sundry other peacenik groups will see it differently, and we’ll be hearing from them soon enough. Their refrain will be some version of the tried and tested (but still non- sensical) “we’ve-stooped-to-their-level-therefore-the-terrorists-have-won” poppycock. Don’t buy it.
Terrorists don’t win when we play tough. They win when they kill Americans, plain and simple. Listen also for something along the lines of “Colonel West’s conduct shocked the conscience.” He may have offended some Victorian sensibilities, but I don’t find firing two bullets away from someone to be as shocking as firing them at someone, which is exactly what this Iraqi and his cohorts had designs on doing. Personally, my conscience would be shocked if I knew American deaths could have been prevented if only the Army’s had played hardball with an enemy combatant it had in its custody.
Humanrightsniks can be forgiven their ignorance. But the Army has no excuse. At bot- tom, the Army’s position is that, given the choice between not getting the confession and getting it but by unconventional means, it would pick the former. But not getting the confession means American soldiers would have needlessly died, which means that, to the Army, process matters more than American lives. Not exactly a message that will inspire Army recruits, if you ask me.
Perhaps the judge advocates in Iraq have forgotten because the New York Times does- n’t remind them every day, but Colonel West and his brethren are at war. Not a war by name, like the war on drugs or the war on poverty. A real guns-and-bullets, lose-and- we-stick-you-in-a-box-and-fly-you-home war. Their enemies conspire to kill them, and they do so at the rate of at least one troop a day (the New York Times makes sure we remember). Our soldiers, in turn, are permitted to shoot and kill their enemies. With this prosecution, the Army is saying that it is okay for soldiers to kill a would-be Amer- ican killer, but put a little fear in them? See you in court. Lest you have doubts, sup- pose this incident had occurred in early September, 2001. Suppose instead of an Iraqi resister, Colonel West interrogated an al-Qa'ida terrorist. And suppose instead of a planned sniper attack, the interrogation was about a plan to hijack commercial air- planes and fly them into tall buildings and government offices. Only the most rabid Blame America First-er could argue the ends wouldn’t justify the means in that case. Conceptually, I don’t see the difference.
Frankly, firing a few shots to make a bird sing doesn’t strike me as a big deal. Colonel West was hardly playing gulag guard. He didn’t torture or maim the man who would kill him. Heck, he didn’t even take Allah’s name in vain. I’ve seen worse on NYPD Blue.
Don’t get me wrong! I like gun-free discourse as much as the next guy. But the Army’s job is to win wars, not worry that a man who planned to kill American troops might have had a momentary lump in his throat. Colonel West’s situation–like the Guantanamo detainees case before it--shows that the ever-spreading cancer of process-above-all- else is spreading to the military. For Americans who wants to win wars, that should be of considerable concern.
The Middle East & the Problem of Iraq
Page Two Page One
The Problem of Rogue States:
Iraq as a Case History
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three Page Two Page One
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor