THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 102, may 20, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

SHOULD ISRAEL FORSAKE GAZA?  WOULD ISRAEL'S WITHDRAWAL
FROM GAZA HELP BRING ENDURING PEACE TO THE MIDDLE EAST?
By Asaf Romirowsky

FULL STORY:   On Sunday, May 2, 2004, Ariel Sharon faced what may have been his biggest challenge. His right-leaning Likud party rejected "unilateral disengagement" from the Gaza Strip, even after the full blessing of President Bush on April 14. The majority vote of "no" that emerged from the party referendum revived one of the most divisive scenes Israel has seen in a while. Indeed, the rejection of disengagement may have saved Israel from the fireworks of more than 20 years ago, when Israel withdrew from a settlement in the Sinai peninsula called "Yamit."

Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's historical visit to Jerusalem in 1979 was a dramatic shift in Arab-Israeli relations. As part of the eventual Egyptian-Israeli agreement, then Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin returned the Sinai Peninsula, which Israel conquered during the 1967 Six Day War.

When Begin was elected in 1977, the Israeli settler movement saw one of their own become the head of government. For the settlers, leaving Sinai under the Camp David agreements meant evacuating Yamit a settlement that came to be known as the Jewish capital of Northern Sinai. That evacuation dismayed members of the settler movement, Gush Emunim, and many of them stood strong in the face of the Israeli army, which was sent to forcibly evacuate them.

Today, with the prospect of unilateral disengagement from Gaza, many of those same settlers who were forcibly relocated to the Gaza Strip after the 1979 peace treaty fear that they will once again be relocated from their homes.

The question is: would it be worth it? Does the transfer of the settlements in the Gaza Strip really act as a catalyst for achieving peace between Israel and the Palestinians?

As the defunct Oslo peace process demonstrated, far-reaching territorial concessions on the part of Israel does not necessarily bring peace. During the last round of peace talks in 2000, when Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered to uproot the majority of Israeli settlements and withdrawal from over 90% of the disputed territories, the Palestinians balked. This suggests disengagement from disputed territories will not get to the root of the problem. Rather, before disengagement takes place, peace requires permanent acknowledgment from Palestinians that they peacefully accept Israel's existence.

Some might say that Israel gained peace from its withdrawal from the Sinai.The cold (perhaps frigid) peace between Israel and Egypt is, of course, even after 25 years, still far from perfect. Egypt has withdrawn its ambassador from Israel, and Mubarak refuses to visit Israel. Trade between the two countries is minimal. In addition, Egypt still portrays Israel as she did pre-1979 as an enemy. As professor Shlomo Avineri of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem writes, "The Egyptian press, mainly under government control, is scathing in its depiction not only of Israel and Zionism, but also of Jews in general, with state TV presenting vitriolic anti-Semitic programs; Egyptian academics, artists, and sport teams refuse to visit Israel; no Israeli has ever been invited to an Egyptian university; and Egyptian schoolbooks continue to present Israel in the same way as when the two countries were at war." [1]

Israel and Egypt are able to have peace because there is a border between the two countries and they are two territorially separate states. Palestinians and Israelis do not have such a luxury. Despite negotiations for a two-state solution, the Palestinians ultimately seek all of Israel as their own and every proposed border is seen by one side as an attempt to take more land from the other.

Sharon no doubt recognizes that the Palestinian Authority under Yasir Arafat is not Egypt under Anwar Sadat or even under Hosni Mubarak. The conflict will continue as long as Palestinians refuse to accept the idea of comprimise for a two-state solution. Thus, the Israelis must impart the message that it would be better for Palestinians to work on finding new political leaders and working with Israel to secure a compromise peace. For Palestinians to reach that conclusion, Israel needs a strategy that forces them to recognize that terrorism will not bring them rewards. That means among others things a sustained war on the Palestinian terror groups that disrupts operations, ruins their morale, and keeps their leaders (while they live) looking over their shoulders. Anything less will be a failure, which is why unilateral withdrawal from Gaza is inherently risky.

Notes:

[1] http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/Printer&cid= p=1006953079865


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:

The Israeli-Arab Conflict

The Middle East & the Arabs

Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism

More on Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism

War & Peace in the Real World

Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.

Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization

Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies

U.S. National Security Strategy



Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
May 5, 2004

The original version of the article appeared in FrontPageMagazine.Com and can also be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues

POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy