An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 109, May 27, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

By Dr. Daniel Mandel

FULL STORY:   Does Hollywood stereotype minority groups? In particular, does it stereotype Arabs and Muslims? And what bearing, if any, do the answers to these questions have on current United States policy and conduct in Iraq?

Popular films have always stereotyped groups to a greater or lesser extent. But it is often claimed that, having abandoned most stereotypes -- even the Soviet enemy is gone, along with the Cold War -- Hollywood is clinging to one last set, Arabs and Muslims, and vilifying those groups for the sake of entertainment.

In short, intolerance and racism is the cause, indoctrination by Hollywood stereotype is the charge, and U.S. aggression against Middle Easterners is the result -- a claim echoed by Joseph Wakim in The Age of Melbourne, May 11, 2004: "To Bush, the Arab Is Always the Villain."

As it happens, however, these claims are fanciful. Hollywood has never dispensed with stereotypes. Some -- American Indians, the Soviets -- have been moderated or even dropped. The public sees these as unjust or dated. Others, held to be adequately true to life or relevant, persist. Middle Eastern terrorists, Italian mafias, Russian organised crime leagues, and a host of others have all appeared in recent films, and with reason: such depictions reflect realities known to the film-going public. Add to this a host of other stock characterisations that have been remarkably constant over the years -- chillingly amoral business executives, urbanely heartless British politicians and officers, pushy Jewish lawyers, rogue army generals, black street gangs -- and it is clear that generalized depictions of large swathes of humanity are part of Hollywood's stock in trade.

Because terrorism against Americans is carried out by Arabs and Muslims, there is a basic truth to movies such as True Lies (1994), Executive Decision (1996), and The Siege (1998) that lends them the minimum authenticity required by viewers to suspend disbelief.

True Lies is a story about Islamists planning to explode nuclear devices in the U.S.A. Executive Decision deals with Islamists hijacking a plane and planning to unleash a deadly toxin in the U.S.A. The Siege tells of an Islamist group carrying out horrific attacks on New York. None of these scenarios lack feasibility, and some of them have since come to pass.

Unsurprisingly, screenwriters focus on realities well known to their audience, and there is simply no escaping the fact that the Middle East abounds in terrorist groups. That is why the action in, for example, GI Jane (1997), takes place in Libya, rather than Costa Rica. That is why the terrorists in True Lies are Middle Eastern, rather than Scandinavian.

Even Delta Force (1986), a film rightly criticised by Wakim as gratuitously offensive to Arabs, recalls events -- the public slaying of an American hostage, the segregating of Jews and Israelis from other airline passengers -- from real life.

In short, stock characters and situations are to be expected in popular fare, and the use of stereotypes is not necessarily reprehensible, unless it has no basis in fact. Were it otherwise, it would be impossible to depict Nazis or Japanese imperialists without being accused of racism and vilification.

To the claim that we never see Jews or Blacks depicted this way, the answer must be that the day we have Jewish Osama bin Ladens or Black Mohammed Attas, we are likely to see their fictional counterparts on the silver screen.

Hollywood, in any case, makes a poor suspect for explaining the brutality of American prison guards in Iraq. No war has ever been completely free of atrocities, let alone cruelty of the type exhibited by the guards.

Without the aid of Hollywood, armies and militias in many continents have engaged in far worse, not least in the Middle East itself, where, for example, the depredations of Saddam's genocidal regime attracted less comment than present American misdeeds.

If Hollywood is a poor suspect, so too is George Bush. Agree or disagree on the wisdom of his invading Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein, Bush has, if anything, gone out of his way to avoid offence to Islam.

Indeed, by describing it often as a religion of peace, and by saying al-Qa'ida terrorists are religious renegades, Bush has strayed into a province better left to imams and scholars than to politicians. Undoubtedly, his doing so serves a political purpose -- but not the one of ratcheting up racism.

Criticism of Western politics and popular culture, hauled into court to explain the ills of the Middle East, is often couched in the language of fair play and pluralism. In fact, however, it tends to become a form of concealment for the region's ills, either through denial or blame. Neither assists public understanding.

The Middle East & the Arabs

Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three    Page Two    Page One

War & Peace in the Real World
   Page Two    Page One

Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.

Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization

Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies

U.S. National Security Strategy

Dr Daniel Mandel is Associate Director of the Middle East Forum in Philadelphia and a fellow in history at The University of Melbourne.

Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News (MEF NEWS)
May 15, 2004

The original version of the article appeared in the The Age of Melbourne (May 15, 2004) and a copy can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.

Return to Top of Page


Return to Beginning of
Public Issues & Political Controversies

Return to Beginning of
Volume VI, 2004

Return to Beginning of
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two

Return to Beginning of
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One




Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control

This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy