THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 112, May 31, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
"THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW":
BAD SCIENCE, BAD MOVIE
By Alan Caruba
FULL STORY:
Coming to a theatre near you on Memorial Day is The Day After Tomorrow, a movie intended to convince those foolish
enough to see it that global warming will lead to a new Ice Age in America. As science fiction goes, this is as fictional as one can
get, since there is absolutely no scientific basis for the story this movie depicts.
Just like global warming, it is just a story, but it is one intended to further the aims of the theory that has been kicking around now
since the original effort in the 1970s by environmentalists to convince people that an Ice Age was coming.
Having failed to scare enough people, this was converted into a theory that the world was warming too much from greenhouse
emissions. These were said to be creating too much carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” elements in the atmosphere. The
automobile received the largest blame for this, along with the use of any of the other “fossil fuels” such as coal and natural gas.
Real scientists, not the ones who sold out to the environmentalists, know a lot about the way the Earth really functions. It is, by
the way, an estimated 5.4 billion years old. While climate is probably one of the least predictable things that occurs any time and
anywhere on Earth, there is enough known to dispute the cockeyed global warming theory. For a long time, some very brave
voices have been speaking out against the global warming theory, and most people by now, whether they know a thing about the
science involved, have probably concluded the theory is nonsense.
The Day After Tomorrow will no doubt use some wonderful special effects to suggest that millions are doomed by the
fictional Ice Age, but Hollywood is hardly the place to turn to for anything other than a brief respite of entertainment. Indeed, the
early critical word on this film is that it is pretty awful.
To understand what drives the climate on Earth, one need only look up into the sky and see the Sun. It, more than any other factor,
determines climate. As the Earth moves around it, various portions experience the different seasons in different ways. When it is
Winter in America, it is summer in Australia, and vice-versa. And, even when it is Winter in America, parts of it like Florida, being in
a semi-tropical zone, don’t even experience it at all.
In addition to changing solar activity, other factors affecting the climate are the oceans, clouds, and even varying levels of volcanic
activity. The effect that mankind has on the climate is minimal. Global warming is largely based on the view that humans have to
change their behavior or the Earth is doomed from our use of various forms of energy.
In reality, if there was more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and temperatures were a bit warmer overall, life on Earth would improve,
not the least from longer periods of agricultural production, increased forest growth, and the general comfort we associate with
warmer weather. If one just considers the hardships associated with Winter blizzards, this would seem obvious to anyone. Almost
invariably, in the midst of each major Winter blizzard, some environmental organization issues a news release blaming it on global
warming. It has become a favorite topic of cartoonists.
The Day After Tomorrow is best seen as a cartoon, as a figment of someone’s imagination. There is something called the
Atlantic Meriodonal Oscillation (AMO) and scientists acknowledge that, were it to become inactive, “substantial short-term cooling
would result in Western Europe, especially during the Winter.” This scary scenario has been already been put forth by the United
Nations International Panel on Climate Control, making this claim in 2001. The only problem is that even UN's own computer models
don’t predict it.
When it comes to the weather, even the most sophisticated computer models used by our National Weather Service often can fail to
predict a blizzard or, at least, the area it will cover and how much snow it will produce.
In a recent edition of a newsletter published by the Cooler Heads Coalition, Canadian scientists Andrew Weaver of the University of
Victoria and Claude Hailaire-Marcel of the Universite de Quebec a Montreal, have stated:
“In light of the paleoclimate record and our understanding of the contemporary climate system, it is safe to
say that global warming will not lead to the onset of a new Ice Age.
“These same records suggest that it is highly unlikely that global warming will lead to a widespread collapse
of the AMO…”
When scientists use words like “highly unlikely,” they mean it just won’t happen. Wallace Broecker, an oceanographer, weighed in
to add:
“Exaggerated scenarios serve only to intensify the existing polarization over global warming.”
In other words, the worse the doomsday prediction, the less likely it will occur.
So, The Day After Tomorrow will show up in theatres and, no doubt, after a short run, find its way to your local video store
and then later on be broadcast on television. None of which means that its doomsday message is worth worrying about.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, Communications Director of the American Policy Center,
and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly
column, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center
(www.anxietycenter.com). A compilation of his past col- umns, entitled Warning Signs, is published by Merril Press. In addition
to Warning Signs, Caruba is the author of A Pocket Guide to Militant Islam and The United Nations vs. the United States,
both of which are available from the National Anxiety Center, 9 Brookside Road, Maplewood, New Jersey, 07040.
Copyright 2004 Alan Caruba
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy