An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 148, July 7, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

By Christopher G. Adamo

FULL STORY:   Among Americans old enough to remember the taking of American hostages by Iran in November of 1979, few can recollect the incident without also recalling the shame and humiliation of America’s spineless response to Iran’s aggression. Far from taking decisive action against what was clearly a premeditated attack, then President James Earl Carter, Jr., reacted by seeking every means possible of appeasing and consoling the militant Islamists, led by the Ayatollah Khomeni, who had gained control of Iran shortly prior to taking the hostages.

As the months dragged on, Carter’s obsequious behavior only served to confirm that America would never be able to pander and appease its way into the good graces of a nation whose ideology demanded perpetual hatred of Western culture. Fortunately, the election of Ronald Wilson Reagan, which occurred in part because of America’s frustration with Jimmy Carter’s bungling of the hostage situation, convinced the Iranians that a new approach by the Americans, likely involving the use of military force, would shortly ensue .

Soon after Ronald Reagan’s election, and well before inauguration day, Iranian leaders began responding in earnest to American efforts at negotiating for the release of the hostages. Not coincidentally, they were freed by their captors at the exact moment Reagan was sworn in as America’s fortieth President.

More recently, the “Carter model” was tried once again during the 1990s. With Carter himself representing American interests, President William Jefferson Clinton sought to negotiate an agreement with the North Koreans in order to appease his way out of a nuclear impasse. The “success” of Carter's mission, so loudly touted by Bill Clinton, Congressional Democrats, and the media, amounted to the U.S.A. giving North Korea the very means of developing a nuclear arsenal, in exchange for the absurd promise that it would not do so. Of course North Korea’s leaders never had any intention of abiding by such a laughable agreement, since it possesses neither the diplomatic honesty to keep its word, nor sufficient respect for the U.S.A. that might have compelled it to do so.

By all indications, a Kerry presidency would quickly revert America back to the embarrassment and abject failure of the Carter and Clinton years. In a press release on June 28, 2004, John Kerry somewhat reluctantly conceded that the handover of sovereign power to the newly established Iraqi government constitutes an improvement in that situation. But the initial focus of his comments was his contention that President George W. Bush ostensibly needs to “repair relationships with NATO allies.” England, Poland, Italy, Turkey, and even Spain (initially) were supportive of American action in Iraq to the point of sending their own military forces into the region. So what Kerry suggests is that America needs to come together with France and Germany, who for the sake of their own selfish interests, diligently worked to undermine any American efforts to oust Saddam Hussein from power.

While President Bush has, in recent weeks, been somewhat conciliatory to the French and Germans, this reflection of his personal character is a far cry from Kerry’s oft-repeated assertion that it is the U.S.A. which needs to make some sort of amends, as if America, by not deferring to French and German pacifism and self-serving opportunism, somehow committed an offense against them. Kerry would insteadhave had the United States appease the French and Germans, who in turn wanted to appease Saddam Hussein and thus the terrorists with whom he collaborated, as if such action might actually be in the best interests of the United States.

France and Germany may never have expressed displeasure regarding Carter’s deal with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il. And to individuals who approach international relations in a manner similar to John Kerry, the approval of such European “allies” might signify something more worthwhile than America’s success in Iraq. However, the end result of that fiasco was that North Korea achieved nuclear capability and now threatens America and the rest of the hemisphere.

In spite of what he obviously considers to be a flawed approach, Kerry closed his brief statement by expressing “hope” for President Bush’s success. Worse than mere posturing, his words convey a suggestion that American victory in Iraq resulted from nothing more than happenstance, since he is openly critical of the conditions under which it occurred. While Kerry now warns of the insufficiency of sheer “words” and “resolutions,” before the Iraq operation commenced last year, the absence of such things as sheer "words" and "resolutions" evoked severe disapproval from him. Should America ever dare to trust its future to such incoherent thinking?

American Politics & Political Competition

American Government & the U.S. Presidency

The Middle East & the Problem of Iraq

The Problem of Rogue States:
Iraq as a Case History

The Middle East & the Problem of Iran

The Middle East & the Arabs

The Threat of Radical Islam

More on the Threat of Radical Islam

The Far East & U.S. Foreign Policy

War & Peace in the Real World

Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.

Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization

Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies

U.S. National Security Strategy

Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer who lives in southeastern Wyoming and works in the field of industrial instrumentation. He is actively involved in Wyoming's political process, serving as a delegate to successive Wyoming State Republican Conventions and as a member of the Wyoming State Republican Central Committee. He has assisted Republican candidates for local and state legislatures and for the United States Congress. His articles, which appear regularly in The Progressive Conservative, U.S.A., and on a number of other websites, reflect a major concern with the damage being done to Conservatism and Conservative causes by the Liberal Leftist faction in the Republican Party as well as by the much larger and more powerful Liberal Leftist faction in the Democratic Party. During the early and middle 1990s, Adamo was Editor of the Wyoming Christian Coalition's official news organ, The Wyoming Christian. Adamo maintains his own Internet website, which is located at

Return to Top of Page


Return to Beginning of
Public Issues & Political Controversies

Return to Beginning of
Most Recent Articles

Return to Beginning of
Volume VI, 2004

Return to Beginning of
Subject Matter Highlights




Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control

This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy