THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 245, November 18, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
ENDING AMERICA'S DEPENDENCE ON MIDDLE EAST OIL:
A BRIEFING BY GAL LUFT
Summary Account by An J. Goldman
SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT, & THEIR FULL & SUCCESSFUL DEPLOYMENT AS THE MEANS OF
AMERICA'S ACHIEVING SUPERIORITY IN THE WAR AGAINST MILITANT ISLAM & DEPRIVING THE ENEMY OF ITS PRESENT
ADVANTAGES -- ENDING THE CURRENT SITUATION IN WHICH THE U.S.A. FINANCIALLY SUPPORTS BOTH ITSELF & ITS ENEMIES
IN THE WAR ON ISLAMIST TERRORISM: ENDINDING U.S. DEPENDENCE ON MIDDLE EAST OIL THROUGH ADOPTION &
IMPLEMENTATION OF A PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENTMENT & UTILIZATION OF ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES
THE FULL STORY:
INTRODUCTION
In both World War Two and the Cold War, the side best deploying scientific innovation and technological advancement achieved
superiority. The turning point in the war on militant Islam will similarly arrive in the form of innovation that deprives the enemy of its
current advantages.
Today, however, the United States of America finds itself in the position of financially supporting both itself and its enemies in the
"War on Terror." This is a consequence of the U.S.A.'s growing dependence on oil, particularly as a transportation fuel. Currently,
the United States consumes 25% of the world's oil, while possessing only 3% of world oil reserves. The Muslim world, in contrast,
depends on oil far less, while possessing 75% of the world's oil reserves. As the U.S.A continues to invest in the oil economies of the
Middle East and the Muslim world, these economies continue to use their oil revenues to spread radical Islam, promote anti-Semitic
and anti-American ideas, and, in some cases, develop unconventional weapons. Every time an American goes to a gas station, he is
sending money to America's enemies.
To complicate the matter, America is not the only country with a growing demand for foreign oil. China and India, hosting two of the
largest and fastest growing economies, are also experiencing a steep rise in their demand for transportation fuel. China, for example,
will likely enter into Middle Eastern politics in order to meet this demand. It will need to enhance its diplomatic relations in the region
and possibly increase its weapons sales to the Muslim world's oil moguls. Foreshadowing this potential development is the Pakistani
nuclear bomb, which was built by the Chinese and financed by the Saudis.
STEEP RISE IN OIL PRICES
The steeply rising demand for oil today means that the disruption of petroleum production causes oil prices to rise. America's Islamist
foes are aware of this reality and view it as America's Achilles' heel. According to an al-Qa'ida spokesman, the October, 2002, attack on
a French oil tanker off the coast of Yemen was a victory against the "Crusader nations." After the terrorist attack against oil employees
in Khobar, Saudi Arabia, al-Qa'ida leaders bragged that the consequent rise in oil prices caused Americans to suffer. (The website
www.iags.org documents terrorist attacks on oil facilities around the world).
Some people believe that an American invasion of Saudi Arabia, home to the world's largest oil reserves, will resolve the oil problem.
These people fail to look at the situation in Iraq, home to the world's second largest oil reserve. Due to the instability caused by the
invasion, the U.S.A. is not receiving any Iraqi oil and will not obtain any Iraqi oil in the near future. Results from an invasion of Saudi
Arabia would be similar.
The U.S.A. needs to get serious about gradually reducing the demand for foreign oil and bringing about the turning point in the current
war. To do so, it must promote scientific and technological advancement by tapping into homegrown fuel sources that can be used for
transportation purposes. These include: electricity, coal, and biomass (agricultural waste). Currently, the U.S.A. has 25% of the world's
coal and billions of tons of biomass. In fact, nearly 60% of the garbage Americans throw away can be used as transportation fuel.
ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF TRANSPORTATION FUEL
Electricity can power vehicles. On an electric battery, a vehicle may drive between 20 and 40 miles before the battery needs to recharge,
which can be done easily overnight. New hybrid vehicles will carry both an electric battery and a normal engine. The engine will run on
gasoline only after a driver exceeds the mileage capacity of the electric battery. This will make possible trips longer than 40 miles. These
hybrids will empower electricity companies and end the transportation fuel monopoly held by the oil companies.
Alcohol fuels such as ethanol, made from corn or biomass, and methanol, made from coal, can also power a vehicle. Flexible fuel vehicles
can run on any combination of gasoline and alcohol, thus reducing the overall amount of oil used. There are three million cars on the
road today that are built to use the alcohol-gasoline mixture. Ford Taurus, Dodge Caravan, and Mercedes C-320 are all flexible fuel cars.
In addition to decreasing U.S. need for foreign oil, flexible fuel will also aid the economy, since it will bring new jobs to the American
farmers and the American coal miners.
These alternate fuel vehicles can move the U.S.A into an energy era free of dependence on OPEC and other oil exporters. Equally
significant, the Europeans, Chinese, Japanese, and others will look to the U.S.A. as the world leader in this new energy era.
Unfortunately, current U.S. energy policy is looking elsewhere, towards seeking oil reserves outside the Middle East. This is, at best,
a short-term and ultimately shortsighted solution. If we deplete the oil reserves outside the Middle East before we deplete the reserves
in the Middle East, we will become in time more dependent on Middle Eastern oil than ever before.
CONCLUSION
To avoid these outcomes, there needs to be a "Set America Free Plan" that will utilize alternate energy sources. In order to effectively
implement its principles, leaders of this initiative must use the Conservative political movement in America as its avenue to the
American public.
Usually, environmental political groups endorse energy initiatives of this nature as part of environmental preservation or anti-global
warming campaigns. These campaigns, however, fail to resonate with the American public because of a general apathy toward the
environment and distrust of anti-capitalists causes. Contrarily, if the initiative is presented by the Conservatives and linked to the
national security agenda, it will gain the necessary public support for implementation. Consequently, Liberal political groups will also
look to endorse the new energy campaign, further bolstering its appeal. Essentially, America will not be able to win its "War on
Terror," if energy security is not at the top of its agenda.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
The Middle East & the Arabs
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
The foregoing summary account of Gal Luft's briefing to the Middle East Forum was written by Ari J. Goldman, a researcher at the
Middle East Forum. The summary account can be found on the Internet website maintained by the
Middle East Forum.
Gal Luft is Executive Director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, which is locayed in Washington, D.C. Mr Luft is a
specialist on strategic issues and energy policy and holds a PhD in Strategic Studies from Johns Hopkins University. A former
lieutenant colonel in the Israeli Defense Forces, his writings have appeared in Commentary, Foreign Affairs, The
Los Angeles Times, Middle East Review of International Affairs, The Washington Post, and the Wall Street
Journal. Mr. Luft addressed the Middle East Forum and delivered his briefing in Philadelphia on October 27, 2004.
Summary Account of the Briefing Republished with
Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
November 16, 2004
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy