THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 255, December 6, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
STEALING PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE NAME
OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
By Peyton Knight
ENVIRONMENTALISM, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, & PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS -- NEIGHBORS & LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
VIOLATING THE RIGHTS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE NAME OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION & HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
FULL STORY:
Pop quiz! Who should make the decision whether or not to raze your decrepit, century-old home and build a new one in its place?
A) Your local government.
B) Your neighbors.
C) Both A and B.
D) You.
If you answered D, you obviously don’t live in West Bridgewater, Connecticut, where your neighbors and the local government want
to call the shots on your property.
The West Bridgewater Historical Commission announced in early October that it wants to create a “demolition delay bylaw” whereby
any property owner who wishes to demolish his old, decrepit home and replace it with a new one, must file a “notice of intent to
demolish a significant building” and wait for up to half a year to receive (or not receive) a “demolition permit.”
Once a property owner files his request to do want he wants to with his property, the Historical Commission schedules a public hearing
on the matter and the property owner is required to post a notice of the public hearing that is visible from the nearest public way.
After the public hearing, the Commission is given 21 days to cast its judgment and decide whether the property owner’s plans to do
what he wants with his property conflict with what South Boston’s The Enterprise describes as “West Bridgewater's historical,
cultural, or architectural heritage or resources.” In other words, the property owner is screwed.
Historical Commission Chairwoman Francine Sheedy claims that this is just “a delay” or “review process.” She waxes bureaucratic,
saying the trampling of a homeowner’s property rights simply “allows a community to give a property a second chance.”
Usually these bleeding hearts reserve second chances for felons and convicts. Now in West Bridgewater, 100-year-old homes are
given more rights than their owners, who of course, have no chance.
STEALING PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE NAME OF DUST CONTROL
The Grossglasses, a family of motocross enthusiasts, were recently looking to purchase some land in the Anza Valley, California,
region to have a place to ride their motorbikes with their 11-year-old son, Johnny.
Not so fast.
According to the North County Times, a proposed Riverside County ordinance “would, for the first time, establish rules for
riding motorcycles, dune buggies, and other off-road vehicles on private property within the county’s vast unincorporated areas.”
Endangered plants and animals, view-sheds, noise pollution, and just plain good ol’ environmental awareness have all been offered
up as reasons to clamp down on property owners in Riverside.
The North County Times reports that county planners are proposing “that off-road families own at least five acres, live on the
property, limit riding to two people at a time…Hours of riding would be limited to 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. in Winter and 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.
during Summer. No one could start engines on Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s Day.”
Remember, all these rules and regulations are for private property. Deputy Planning Director Mark Balys claims that neighbor
complaints of dust being kicked-up and engine noise are the reasons for action. Of course, there are already common sense
“nuisance” laws, whereby neighbors can resolve these matters. But this isn’t about common sense. It’s about eliminating off-road
recreation.
“What they have come up with is absolutely, utterly, totally insane,” says Meg Grossglass. “It’s just an outrageous infringement on
private property rights.”
When off-road enthusiasts and families like the Grossglasses are booted from designated trails in state and national parks, they’re
told that, if they want to enjoy their hobby, they need to enjoy it on their own property. Now, they can’t even do that — unless they
can afford to purchase a minimum of five acres. And even then, they can’t ride as a family on their own property, given the
two-riders-at-a-time rule.
The way things are going, there may soon be no place left to ride — which is exactly what radical environmentalists want.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
American Politics & Local Self-Government
Civil Liberties -- Private Property Rights
Peyton Knight is the Executive Director of the American Policy Center, a grassroots, activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton,
Virginia. The American Policy Center maintains an Internet site at www.americanpolicy.org.
Copyright 2004 American Policy Center
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba,
Director of Communications,
American Policy Center
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy