THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 46, March 5, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
NORTH KOREA: CHINA'S "BORROWED KNIFE"
By Alan Caruba
COMMUNIST CHINA, ITS NORTH KOREAN PROXY, & UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY IN THE FAR EAST: RED CHINA'S
USE OF NORTH KOREA TO ADVANCE CHINA ALONG THE ROAD TO HEGEMONY IN THE FAR EAST & BEYOND, WHILE HIDING ITS
AGGRESSIVE, IMPERIALISTIC STRATEGY BEHIND A MASK OF DIPLOMACY -- THE SERIOUS THREAT TO WORLD PEACE & U.S.
NATIONAL SECURITY POSED BY RED CHINA & NORTH KOREA & OUR NEED TO SOLIDIFY & STRENGTHEN THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN
THE U.S.A. & AMERICA'S FAR EASTERN ALLIES, INCLUDING JAPAN, TAIWAN, & SOUTH KOREA
FULL STORY:
It just never fails to amaze me how, throughout history and, in particular, the last century, nations, great and small, saw what was
coming and, yet, were unable or unwilling to stop two world wars and an endless spate of smaller, but no less deadly, conflicts.
Which brings us to today, where we peer across the vast Pacific Ocean at North Korea and wonder whether its leader is insane
enough to launch a nuclear-armed missile at us or maybe just at South Korea or Japan?
That’s the kind of calculus the President of the United States has to make every day, while the rest of us must depend on the
following kind of reporting out of Beijing. It was February 18, 2005, and Elaine Kurtenbach of the Associated Press wrote:
“China said yesterday it will send a top Communist Party official to North Korea
for talks in an effort to break the stalemate over the North’s nuclear program, but
Beijing urged its diplomatic partners to be patient as it deals with the volatile
country, a longtime ally.”
She went on to say that, “China, the North’s biggest backer and major source of aid to the impoverished country, has been wary of
openly testing its influence on Pyongyang.” Wary?
This is what passes for informed reporting. The only problem is that, when China says, “jump”, North Korea says “How high?”
Pyongyang is owned lock, stock, and barrel by China. North Korea was originally the creation of the former Soviet Union’s dictator,
Joseph Stalin, who picked Kim Il Sung, the father of the current despot, Kim Jong Il, to aid the expansion of the USSR with an
audacious attack on the South, on June 24, 1950.
The U.S.A. paid the price of not fully understanding Stalin’s intention to enlarge the reach and grip of the USSR following the end
of World War II. Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman had already ceded the whole of Eastern Europe to Stalin, and,
in Asia, the U.S.A. had substantially reduced its own troop strength and, at the same time, failed to arm the South Koreans, for fear
they might try to liberate their families and countrymen to the North. Suffice it to say, just like 9-11, the North Korean attack came as
a complete surprise to the politicians and bureaucrats in Washington, D.C..
If you want to know what we’re really up against with the Chinese and North Koreans, read William C. Triplett II’s new book,
Rogue State: How Nuclear North Korea Threatens America ($27.95, Regnery Publishing Co.) Triplett is a veteran national
security specialist. If you do read his book, you will discover that North Korean warheads could hit American soil, that North Korea
is selling nuclear weapons technology to terrorist states and groups, and that Kim Jung Il is, among other nasty things, training
Arab terrorists and others with an eye to sabotaging Japan’s nuclear power plants and doing all kinds of other mischief.
Put plainly, Red China will determine what North Korea will do and has, for decades, supported its most aggressive, criminal instincts.
The Korean conflict ended in a truce, but only after Red China had committed thousands of its own troops in an effort to turn the tide.
Why would we not consider that its desire for hegemony in its part of the world might also include plans for even greater expansion?
History demonstrates that no arms agreement with a rogue state is worth the paper on which it is printed.
However, Triplett warns:
“Short of imminent and confirmed threat to the United States or its allies, America
should not initiate hostilities in Korea. One strong reason is that North Korea has
enough forces in place, particularly missiles and long-range artillery, to damage
large parts of South Korea.”
That’s very different advice from the calls to somehow find and destroy North Korea’s nuclear weapons facilities, presumably
eliminating that threat. The fact is that North Korea has more than one million men on active duty and almost five million reserves.
That makes it the fourth largest armed force in the world. It is an army supplied by an extensive and expensive network of
underground arms factories and depots.
In recent weeks, Japan, which has long taken a passive, self-defensive stance, as regards its military, signaled that, if Red China were
to try to make good on its threats against Taiwan, it would join with the United States in defense of that island nation. That is a
good thing. It swings the power equation in the right direction, and one suspects decisions have already been made to put Japan
on an equal military footing with others in its neighborhood. Dependence on the U.S. military power will give way to a renewed sense
of nationhood and the need to hold its own in the face of threats by North Korea and Red China. Most certainly, the “One China”
fiction that Taiwan should be treated as a non-nation needs to end as official U.S. policy.
North Korea is called “China’s borrowed knife” because it is the instrument Beijing can use, while hiding behind the mask of
diplomacy. It is the Chinese proxy, and anything you read or hear about North Korea reflects Beijing’s worst intentions. Triplett warns
that the Bush administration has “no endgame strategy” to deal with North Korea, does nothing to punish its open aggression and
provocations, and has not determined how to link diplomacy with Red China to whatever diplomacy is possible with North Korea.
If history is any indicator — and it always is — then, sooner or later, North Korea will do something just as surprising as it did in June,
1950. Right now it is selling ballistic missiles to Pakistan, Iran and Syria, while helping those nations develop their own missile systems.
Right now, its missiles threaten Japan and South Korea. And they are able to hit the U.S. West Coast. The difference between 1950
and now would be measured in how many would die.
And the news only gets worse. The European Union has announced it intends to sell weapons to Red China, ignoring a long embargo
against it.
Just as the Associated Press reporter appeared to think that North Korea was an independent nation over which Red China had
little control, this view has its advocates, says Triplett, in the U.S. State Department. Fortunately, the Pentagon has been planning for
decades for the possibility of war with North Korea and, if necessary, Red China. For that, we will need many more divisions than we
currently maintain. Yet, that is the only option we have at present, other than to wait patiently to find out what North Korea and Red
China intend to do.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The Far East & U.S. Foreign Policy
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a
clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted
on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at
www.anxietycenter.com).
© Alan Caruba 2005
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues