THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 83, April 12, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
EURABIA: EUROPE'S FUTURE?
A BRIEFING
By Bat Ye'or
THE IMPACT OF THE CURRENT MASSIVE IMMIGRATION OF ARABS & OTHER MUSLIMS TO EUROPEAN COUNTRIES:
RAPID TRANFORMATION OF EUROPE INTO A CULTURAL & POLITICAL APPENDAGE OF THE ARAB/MUSLIM WORLD -- A
REGION THAT IS FUNDAMENTALLY ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-SEMITIC, ANTI-WESTERN, & ANTI-AMERICAN
FULL STORY:
Europe is undergoing two profound changes. The first is the weakening of Christianity. The second is demographic decline. Presently,
across Europe, there are only two-thirds the number of children born necessary to sustain the population. The consequent drop in
population has mostly been made good by immigration of Muslims. The fast-growing Muslim population is generally not integrated into
the host societies nor politically acculturated to their norms. To the contrary, radical Islamic movements are gaining in strength among
these émigré populations. In addition, European governments, especially the French, have developed foreign policies aimed at winning
the favor of Middle Eastern regimes.
The question arises: Is this a temporary aberration or is Europe on the road to losing its historic identity? The latter: Europe is rapidly
being transformed into "Eurabia," a cultural and political appendage of the Arab/Muslim world that is fundamentally anti-Christian,
anti-Semitic, anti-Western, and anti-American.
EUROPEAN-ARAB PARTNERSHIP
The four-decade political and economic relationship between Europe and the Arab countries of the Middle East, institutionalized in the
annual European-Arab Dialogue, has spawned a virulent and hostile amalgam called "Eurabia." It will not simply go away with a change
in European Union (EU) policy. Rather, its roots are deeper. Indeed, how the Eurabia issue is handled today will largely determine
Europe's future.
The images of Eurabia are manifest in millions of people burning American and Israeli flags during the Iraq war and openly supporting
Yasir Arafat, Saddam Hussein, and other brutal dictators. Eurabia is also discernible in the explosion of anti-Semitic activity and a lack
of empathy for Jewish rights in various European countries. Increasingly, Jews find themselves under attack, chiefly from Muslim
extremists and radicalized youth, and European governments and law enforcement agencies react to these violations of rights only
tepidly and only after the sustained pressure of publicity. The Eurabian phenomenon can also be seen in the intimidation into silence
of critiques of Islam and Muslim society, epitomized by the slaying in broad daylight of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who had
made a documentary on the travails experienced by Muslim women within Muslim societies.
EURABIA IN THE MAKING
This pernicious merger began with Charles De Gaulle in the 1960s. De Gaulle saw that the power of France diminished with the loss of
its colonies and he believed a more unified Europe would restore some French glory. In order to unify Europe, the continent needed to
form an international bloc that could rival America. The Arab nations of the Middle East, unparalleled in their oil wealth, seemed to be
good partners. Laying the foundation for this relationship, on November 27, 1967, De Gaulle said that French-Arab collaboration would
be a fundamental element in French politics. Since then, France has adopted a highly amiable policy toward the Arab world and a hostile
attitude toward Israel.
After the Yom Kippur War of 1973, the Arabs states proclaimed their oil boycott against Europe and specifically against countries with
close ties to Israel. Only twenty days after the start of the war, the European community of nine countries recognized the rights of the
Palestinians to participate in political negotiations and demanded Israel's return to the armistice lines of 1949, thus diverging from UN
Security Council Resolution 242, passed in 1967 and still the basis of a negotiated settlement.
Consequently, the Arab boycott of Europe came to an end; and the French and German governments requested Arab leaders to enter
into an official dialogue with European leaders to cement a solid relationship. The Arab leaders agreed but on condition that the
Europeans had a unified foreign policy in synchrony with the interests of the Arab states.
Elements of this relationship are plenty evident. For example, European leaders see Arab reform running parallel to the resolution of the
Israeli-Arab peace process. Again and again, Arab and European leaders exploit impasses in the Arab-Israeli conflict conveniently to
delay democratic reforms.
The goal of Eurabia is to bring together the two shores of the Mediterranean with the interests of European society mirroring the
interests of the Arab world. There should be a homogenization of culture, politics, and policy between the two shores. As a byproduct,
American leaders have to deal with the growing Eurabian political culture instead of the former European body politic.
Unfortunately, most Europeans are not aware of the Eurabia merger. The new hatred found in Europe against America and Israel is
commonplace and intertwines with many sectors of society, including the media, the culture, and the economy. Europe now facilitates
the jihadist values of the Arab world. This is evident in its reluctance to forthrightly denounce Islamic terrorism and its need to indict
America and Israel as the causes of conflict, rather than the victims of Islamic aggression. Mass immigration of Arabs across the
Mediterranean to Europe, which was part of the friendship agreement, will only strengthen the Eurabian phenomenon. If Europe
continues to respond with appeasement to Islamist terror attacks like that in Madrid in 2004, Eurabia will eventually become the
complete European reality.
CONCLUSIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES
Americans need to take an assertive role in both combating Eurabia's dangers and preventing a similar merger from occurring within
their own country, for this is a danger. For example, American Middle East studies specialists at universities are already
predominantly pro-Arab/Islamic in orientation, dismissive of traditional standards of scholarship, and not bashful about politicizing
formal instruction.
Americans need to embrace their own genuinely pluralist culture. They should not renounce their identity and Judeo-Christian values
to appease the current assertive intolerance emanating from the Arab/Muslim world.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Europe, Europeans, & American Foreign Policy
Europe, Europeans, & Anti-Semitism
Jews & Anti-Semitism
The Middle East & the Arabs
The Threat of Radical Islam
War & Peace in the Real World
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Bat Ye'or, a historian, has published groundbreaking works on minorities and "dhimmitude" (their inferior status) under Islam, including
Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide (2002). Her latest book, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis (Fairleigh
Dickinson University Press, 2005), argues that European governments, especially the French, have developed foreign policies aimed at
winning the favor of Middle Eastern regimes and appeasing the growing militant Islamic minorities in their midst. Bat Ye'or addressed the
Middle East Forum in New York on February 7, 2005.
Ye'or's briefing was originally published as a MEF Wire on the Internet website maintained by the
Middle East Forum.
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
April 5, 2005
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues