BREAKING JUDICIAL FILIBUSTERS: HIGH NOON FOR CONSERVATIVES
By Christopher G. Adamo
By appearing at the gathering (albeit in a videotaped speech), Frist ostensibly violated the “separation of Church and State” rule. According to the latest Liberal Constitutional interpretations, political office holders are forbidden to address public issues in churches, unless they happen to be Democrats on the campaign trail.
As with the Tom Delay and John Bolton controversies, whatever charges Democrats can concoct are asserted as defining factors of an individual’s propriety and fitness for office. Yet identical charges suddenly evaporate into irrelevance the moment any Democrat becomes suspect. Nevertheless, it is not the Democrats' hypocrisy but the Republicans' acquiescence that enables these outrages to continue.
Liberal Democrats will say anything, on any occasion, in order to claim the “moral high ground.” The entire Anita Hill “sexual harassment” controversy was never about protecting the rights and dignity of women. Rather it was about undermining the confirmation of Clarence Thomas. But, when very real cases of harassment and intimidation threatened to derail Bill Clinton’s Presidency, the matter was suddenly relegated to his “private life.”
Unfortunately, Republicans continue their vain attempts to gain traction with the public by considering or intellectually refuting each ensuing argument put forth by the political Left. It is imperative that they recognize the futility of this critically flawed “strategy,” and simply stay on message, particularly in relation to matters regarding the United States Constitution.
Democrats will take any side of an issue of constitutional law, any side that suits their purposes. Usually, they are all for trashing the Constitution (the true interpretation of their term “living document”). Yet when such sanctimony suits them, they suddenly become the Constitution's champions and guardians by way of filibustering judicial nominations.
The Democrats support judicial supremacy and activism (under the auspices of an “independent judiciary”), but condemn the “activism” of pro-Constitution judges. They oppose any pro-life “litmus tests,” while insisting that they will prohibit any judge from being confirmed who does not support “a woman’s right to choose.”
The truly appalling aspect of this situation is not that they will tell any lie, reverse any stance, and level any accusation as the circumstances require (and regardless of how hypocritically they contradict their former assertions). Rather, it is that, all too often, Republicans allow the Democrats to get away with doing so.
Worse yet, Republicans not only treat each ensuing statement as legitimate, they frequently attempt to abide by such absurdities. Thus they continually lose political fights because they fight like losers.
In his April 22 piece, columnist David Limbaugh properly characterized the filibuster battle by stating that “What is at stake in this ongoing fight over judicial nominations is nothing less than the integrity of the Constitution, the independence of the judiciary, the separation of powers, and ultimately, the preservation of popular sovereignty.”
Clearly, the Democrats know this, which is why they persevere with such resolve and venom. The side that triumphs will thus be positioned to determine the future direction of the country. So, why are few, if any, among Republican Senators making this case in these stark, yet entirely accurate terms?
Not wanting to sound “extreme,” they revert instead to some insipid bilgewater about how “The President should be allowed his choice of appointees.” That is what Liberals claimed when Clinton was President . Sadly, too many on the Republican side of the aisle accepted the premise.
Back then, the entire debate ought to have been about the U.S Constitution (meaning that Republicans should have rejected a good percentage of Clinton nominees), and now the debate should again be about the Constitution. Currently making the true meaning and integrity of the Constitution the fundamental issue would result in a no-holds barred fight to get this President’s nominees confirmed.
Were Republicans to unwaveringly explain the situation in such terms, regardless of the latest Democratic Party accusations against them, the message would eventually get out that Republicans fight for the Constitution, while Democrats are fighting to get around it. This is absolutely the case. So why doesn’t anybody on our side have the courage to simply say so?
It was through massive grassroots efforts last Fall that Republicans were able to enjoy overwhelming victories, including those in the United States Senate. If Republican political operatives hope to benefit from any similar level of support in 2006, 2008, and beyond, now is the time for GOP Senators to prove that those efforts were not in vain.
Legal Issues, Lawyers, & America's Judiciary
American Politics & Political Competition
American Government & the U.S. Congress
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, & Other Leftists
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor