ISLAMIC TERRORISM -- PAST, PRESENT, & FUTURE:
THE LESSONS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001
By Alan Caruba
We should celebrate the fact that there has not been a terrorist act since that dread date. We may never know how many plots have been thwarted, but we do know that the U.S.A. has had real success in degrading the ability of our enemies to inflict harm upon us. So far.
There has been considerable debate over the failure to anticipate and stop what occurred on 9-11. The Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and, in general, our vast intelligence community of agencies have all been severely criticized. We owe a debt of gratitude, therefore, to Timothy Naftali, the author of Blind Spot: The Secret History of American Counterterrorism ($26.00, Basic Books) for a careful review of what went wrong and, in many cases, what was done right, often without public notice.
Hindsight gives critics an unearned sense of superiority, but what Naftali, an associate professor at the University of Virginia Miller Institute of Public Affairs, lays out in meticulous detail, is a picture of intelligence professionals struggling to do a difficult job -- often under circumstances limited by either an indifferent or vengeful Congress -- as well as successive administrations whose attention span for terrorist threats waned or grew, depending on who was in the Oval Office.
“After years of studying the intelligence and security world,” writes Naftali, “I have come to believe less in the efficiency of conspiracies than I do in the inefficiency of government.”
We tend to forget that U.S. counterterrorism has been around for a long time, dating its modern origins to World War II. Since then, however, as a response to a variety of threats, the bureaucracy of intelligence (the CIA, the NSA, etc) has been steadily growing, along with that of the FBI, charged with acting against domestic criminal elements and spies.
Naftali reminds us that “the concept of international terrorism had not emerged” during the late 1960’s, despite many separate incidents. It would take years for them to have a cumulative impact, before being recognized as the work of groups which were often state-sponsored and state-funded, but which claimed to be autonomous.
President Lyndon B. Johnson was too involved in micromanaging the Vietnam War to pay much attention to counterterrorism. President Richard M. Nixon, despite being embroiled in Watergate during his second term, is credited with being the first to take the terrorist threat seriously, but, as Naftali notes, “The terms international terrorist and international terrorism did not yet appear in high-level documents or in the national consciousness.” It would take the Palestinian attack on Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympics to awaken the entire world to a deadly new threat that operated across national borders. Let me repeat that date: 1972.
The Ford administration paid little heed to the problem. The Carter administration failures actually emboldened terrorists. By then, however, everyone knew the problem of terrorism existed. It would take until 1978 before Congress initiated any legislative response to the problem.
In January, 1981, in his inaugural address, Ronald W. Reagan was the first President to mention terrorism. Reagan’s policies would bring the Soviet Union to its knees, but, along the way, his administration had some terrible lessons to learn about international Islamic terrorism. A suicide bomber’s 1983 attack on Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, would be one of them.
The pace of counterterrorism activity by our intelligence agencies increased, despite the lethal separation that denied the sharing of information between the FBI and CIA.
The Clinton administration has been accused of a number of intelligence failures and a feckless approach to international terrorism, but Naftali documents that administration made serious efforts to deal with it. Bill Clinton had, in fact, been elected President on the promise to cut funding to both defense and intelligence. The first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 changed a lot of minds in the Clinton administration.
The 1993 WTC bombing was a wake-up call that revealed how “woefully unprepared” the U.S. government was when dealing with serious terrorist attacks at home. The Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Bill of 1995 was, at last, a step in the right direction. It was on Clinton’s watch that al-Qa'ida bombed U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998. Overall, diplomatically and militarily, the Clinton administration failed to respond forcefully to the increase in terrorism on its watch.
Naftali portrays Richard Clarke, a terrorism expert who had served the Ford administration and those that followed, as seemingly the only man who understood the threat al-Qa'ida posed. Time and again, working through the maze of the White House National Security Council, the CIA and anyone else who might listen, he tried to raise awareness from president to president.
That would change on September 11, 2001. But then, everything changed after that fateful day.
It is easy to sit on the sidelines and criticize the nation’s counterterrorism efforts, but what we now know is that good men and women were trying their best to protect us and often being thwarted by the massive, obdurate bureaucracy of their individual agencies, and by politicians looking backward at the Cold War, at the Vietnam War, at Watergate -- while paying little notice to the gathering storm.
The reorganization of our significant anti-terrorism resources will, we’re told, avoid another 9-11, but we still must keep in mind that what has actually occurred. The Homeland Security Department is a further consolidation of an already immense intelligent community. As the Israelis learned after the Six-Day War in 1967, it is the very opposite of what is needed to avoid the next 9-11.
We may well have exchanged the “blind spots” of the past for newer, bigger ones.
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three Page Two Page One
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. Intelligence & America's National Security
Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security
U.S. National Security Strategy
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at www.anxietycenter.com.
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal * Constitutional Law
Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy * Education * Elections, U.S.
Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment * English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race
Europe * Europe: Jews * Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S.
Foreign Aid, U.S. * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health
Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq
Islamic North Africa * Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs
Jews & Anti-Semitism * Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II
Judges, U.S. Federal * Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American
Latino Separatism * Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency * National Identity
National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias * North Africa
Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies * Political Parties
Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S. * Private Property
Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam * Religion & America
Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics * Sedition & Treason
Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa * State Government, U.S.
Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1 * Terrorism 2
Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine * UnAmerican Activity
UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid * U.S. Infrastructure
U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace * Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor