THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S BAD SCIENCE & BAD DECISION
By Alan Caruba
Sometimes, the U.S. Supreme Court makes spectacularly bad decisions, and this was manifest on April 2, 2007, when five of its nine members yielded to the specious argument by twelve states and several environmentalist organizations that the science of “global warming” was so conclusive that the Court could declare that carbon dioxide (CO2) should be regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as “a pollutant.”
CO2 is not a pollutant. It exists in the earth’s atmosphere and every blade of grass, and every great tree is utterly dependent upon it. In that regard, other than the oxygen on which all living creatures depend, CO2 is the second most essential gas for its ability to harness the energy of the sun and, through photosynthesis, maintain every form of vegetation on earth.
The Supreme Court’s ruling, however, insures that the cost of every automobile, truck, and tractor in America is likely to increase for no good reason. The many mandated formulations of gasoline that are part of its cost might also increase.
As William O’Keefe, the Chief Executive Officer of the Marshall Institute, noted in December, 2006, “Given current automotive technology,” the only way to further reduce CO2 emissions “would be via mandates for hybrid or diesel vehicles costing $3,000 to $5,000 more than gasoline counterparts.” Consumers are not buying hybrid cars. Their sales currently constitute just over one percent of the market.
Requiring the auto industry to manufacture hybrids and convert diesel engines would have, O’Keefe noted, “serious economic effects.” That’s a nice way of saying it would be a disaster that any sane nation would avoid.
In March, 2007, the leaders of General Motors, Ford, Toyota and Chrysler, along with the head of the United Auto Workers, made a rare joint appearance before a U.S. House subcommittee. According to an Associated Press report, “They stressed that proposed increases in gas mileage standards would be extremely expensive and could have calamitous results.”
The UAW leader, Ron Gettelfinger, noted that it could include the closing of additional facilities and the loss of tens of thousands of automotive jobs.
It’s not like CO2 even constitutes a problem. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, CO2 represents a concentration in the earth’s atmosphere of 368 parts per million or 0.0368 percent, i.e., three hundred sixty-eight ten-thousandths of one percent! It used to be even less, but, in the past, there weren’t six billion humans exhaling two and a half pounds of it every day.
For a long time environmentalists and political fear-mongers who have been attempting to foist the strictures of the global warming theory on the world through the Kyoto Treaty were stymied by the legislative process. The U.S. Senate totally rejected treaty. Now they have found five members of the Supreme Court who decided to ignore its own 1993 standard for scientific evidence.
At the time, the Court said that, “the trial judge must insure that … all scientific … evidence is not only relevant, but reliable.” How reliable is the science of climate change when the U.S. government continues to spend billions of dollars every year just to study it?
In the recent decision, however, Supreme Court Justice Stevens declared that CO2 is “the most important … greenhouse gas.” There is no scientific proof of that. Moreover, there is no proof that human activity has anything to do with the greenhouse effect.
What is the most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for an estimated 95% of the earth’s greenhouse effect? It is water vapor. Its origin is 99.999% natural. If you wondered where the snow goes when it melts, it becomes, for a time, water vapor. The vast percentage of the earth’s surface is water!
John A. Charles, Jr., President of the Cascade Policy Institute, notes that, “emissions of hydrocarbons from cars and trucks in the U.S. have fallen 99.3% on a per-mile basis since 1968, and carbon monoxide emissions have declined by 96 percent.” We already have clean air, and this has occurred despite increased motor vehicle and energy use.
Contrast that with a U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization report that the global livestock sector is responsible for a higher share of greenhouse gas emissions than transport. According to the report, livestock account for 9% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, 37% of methane emissions, 64% of ammonia emissions, and 65% of global nitrous oxide.
The Supreme Court decision suggests that a global warming of significant and dangerous proportions is actually occurring, but that too is wrong. The earth has not warmed significantly since around 1850, when a century of “warming” ended with an increase of just one degree Fahrenheit.
We are going to pay the price for this decision that empowers the Environmental Protection Agency to consider CO2 “a pollutant” worthy of regulation. The Court had previously ruled that the EPA is forbidden to consider cost when setting national ambient air quality standards.
The Court’s decision also impacts many of the nation’s power plants dependent on inexpensive coal. They are going to have to increase their rates to customers to cover the cost of major renovations. Fully half of the all electricity generated nationwide relies on coal-fired plants.
The twelve, mostly northeastern states that brought the case argued that their air quality was being adversely affected by these plants. According to an Associated Press report,
A microgram is one millionth of anything, such as soot, being measured. Their idiotic lawsuit ignores the fact that particulates from as far away as the Sahara desert routinely show up in the U.S.A. They might as well have sued several African nations.
The 2007 Court has given its blessing to the environmentalist movement’s irrational hatred of all forms of energy that improves our lives. It’s a nasty world in which the environmentalists want us to live.
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly commentary, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center, which is located at www.anxietycenter.com.
Caruba’s new book, Right Answers: Separating Fact from Fantasy, has been published by Merril Press.
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor