THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION & THE FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTER OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT:  THE ROLE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE -- THE BASIC ISSUE:  CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE THROUGH THE AMENDING PROCESS OR THROUGH JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION -- THE INTENT OF THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION VERSUS THE INTENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA & HIS FELLOW LIBERAL LEFTIST IDEOLOGUES IN CONGRESS & ON THE SUPREME COURT -- THE PLOT TO UNDERMINE & DESTROY CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT & CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE U.S.A.

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS, & JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AS A PHILOSOPHY TO GUIDE JUDGES IN INTERPRETING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:  PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA'S NOMINATION OF A RADICAL JUDICIAL ACTIVIST & UNABASHED RACIST FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT -- PRESIDENT OBAMA'S TOTAL LACK OF COMMITMENT TO CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, THE RULE OF LAW, JUDICIAL RESTRAINT, & AMERICA'S SYSTEM OF CHECKS & BALANCES -- OBAMA'S DETERMINATION TO EXPLOIT ETHNIC, RACIAL, & GENDER IDENTITY POLITICS & UTILIZE A RADICAL ACTIVIST SUPREME COURT TO SUBVERT THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES WHICH GOVERN OPERATION OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT & LIMIT THE POWER OF THIS GOVERNMENT

LIBERALISM, CONSERVATISM, & THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN NATION:  PRESIDENTIAL & CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS, REPUBLICAN HOPES FOR VICTORY IN 2008, & THE NEED TO DEMONSTRATE A STARK & DEFINING CONTRAST BETWEEN THE INCREASINGLY LIBERAL LEFTIST IDEOLOGY & POLICY AGENDA OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY & A STRONG & UNBENDING CONSERVATIVE RIGHTIST STANCE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY -- THE NEED FOR A SUPERHAWK REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT & A CONGRESSIONAL MAJORITY THAT WILL SUPPORT HIS ADMINISTRATION IN SECURING AMERICA'S BORDERS AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION & TERRORIST INFILTRATION, AS WELL AS IN EFFECTIVELY PROSECUTING THE WAR AGAINST ISLAMIST TERRORISM -- THE NEED FOR A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENCY & SENATE MAJORITY THAT WILL CONTINUE TO FILL FEDERAL COURT VACANCIES WITH JUDGES WHO ADHERE TO & DECIDE CASES IN ACCORD WITH THE TRUE PRINCIPLES OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, REJECTING THE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OF LEFTWING LIBERALS SEEKING TO OBLITERATE THE BOUNDARIES OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTITUTION

U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON JUDGE SAMUEL A. ALITO, NOMINATED BY PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH FOR APPOINTMENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT:  JUDGE ALITO'S RUNNING THE GAUNTLET THROWN DOWN BY PARTISAN DEMOCRATIC INGUISITORS ASKING GRUELING QUESTIONS & MAKING POLITICALLY BIASED PRONOUNCEMENTS EXPRESSING THEIR OWN LIBERAL LEFTIST NOTIONS REGARDING ISSUES OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT

WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE UPCOMING BATTLE OVER U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF SAMUEL ALITO'S NOMINATION TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: WHETHER AMERICA'S BROKEN LEGAL SYSTEM WILL EVER BE REPAIRED & TRUE JUSTICE RE-ESTABLISHED IN AMERICA -- ALITO'S JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY:  ONE OF DEFERENCE TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS AN ABSOLUTE STANDARD -- WHY LIBERALS OPPOSE ALITO'S CONFIRMATION:  THEIR FEAR THAT MUCH OF THE LIBERAL PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA WILL BE RELEGATED TO THE BALLOT BOX, WHERE IT VERY LIKELY WILL BE DEFEATED

THE PRESIDENT & THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS:  PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S NOMINATION OF SAMUEL ALITO FOR APPOINTMENT TO A VACANCY ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -- RALLYING AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES & BOLSTERING THE CONCEPT OF A SUPREME COURT WHOSE ULTIMATE PURPOSE IS TO UPHOLD & DEFEND THE INTEGRITY OF THE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN & AS PROPERLY AMENDED -- PROTECTING & PRESERVING THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

POLITICAL CONTROVERSY OVER APPOINTMENT OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES:  THE OUTRAGE OF CONSERVATIVES OVER PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S NOMINATION OF HARRIET ELLAN MIERS TO FILL A SUPREME COURT VACANCY -- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A GRAND STRATEGY TO RETURN THE FEDERAL COURTS TO THEIR PROPER ROLE OF PROTECTING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION?  WHY CONSERVATIVES, IN THE MEANTIME, SHOULD NEITHER DECLARE VICTORY NOR CONCEDE DEFEAT

THE APPOINTMENT OF U.S. FEDERAL JUDGES:  APPOINTMENT BY THE PRESIDENT, BY & WITH THE ADVICE & CONSENT OF U.S. SENATE -- HOW LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE SUCCEEDED IN MAKING THE SENATE'S JUDICIAL CONFIRMATION PROCESS A GROTESQUE CARICATURE OF WHAT THE FRAMERS OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION ORIGINALLY INTENDED -- THE DEMOCRATS' ENDEAVOR TO DISTORT THE JUDICIAL CONFIRMATION PROCESS & USE THE U.S. COURTS AS A MEANS OF GAINING POLITICAL POWER FAR GREATER THAN THEY MIGHT HAVE ACQUIRED THROUGH ELECTIONS

THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR FILLING VACANCIES ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT & ON THE LOWER FEDERAL COURTS:  PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION & SENATE CONFIRMATION, THAT IS, JOINT APPOINTMENT BY THE PRESIDENT & THE SENATE -- HOW THIS ASPECT OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF CHECKS & BALANCES HAS BECOME FLAWED AS A RESULT OF ITS MISUSE & ABUSE BY LIBERAL LEFTIST DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE -- MISUNDERSTANDING & DISTORTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE SENATE IN THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS -- THE CONSEQUENCE:   THE POLITICALIZATION & SHARP DECLINE IN QUALITY OF AMERICA'S FEDERAL JUDICIARY

JUDICIAL RESTRAINT & CONSERVATISM VERSUS JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & LIBERALISM:  THE RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING CONTROVERSY OVER THE PROPER MAKEUP OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IN GENERAL & THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN PARTICULAR -- THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED ROLE OF THE U.S. COURTS:  INTERPRETATION & APPLICATION OF EXISTING U.S. LAW IN LEGAL CASES & CONTROVERSIES COMING BEFORE THE COURTS -- JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING & DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC POLICY AS A USURPATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF CONGRESS & THE STATES & A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT:  PERSONAL HONESTY & INTEGRITY, KNOWLEDGE OF & ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, & DETERMINATION TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED & WRITTEN

ISLAMISM & LEFTWING LIBERALISM -- THE COMMON GROUND THAT THE WORLDWIDE ISLAMIC JIHAD & AMERICA'S DOMESTIC POLITICAL & CULTURAL LEFT SHARE:  THEIR DETERMINATION TO FORCIBLY CONVERT THEIR RESPECTIVE PHILOSOPHICAL OPPONENTS & COERCE ENTIRE SOCIETIES INTO CONFORMITY WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES -- IT IS CRITICAL THAT BOTH OF THESE DARK FORCES BE STEADFASTLY OPPOSED & THAT NO ATTEMPTS AT COMPROMISE WITH EITHER OR BOTH OF THEM BE MADE

THE SELLOUT:  THE SOCALLED "COMPROMISE" OF MAY 23, 2005 -- THE SURRENDER BY SEVEN SOCALLED "MODERATE" REPUBLICANS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE TO THE LEFTWING LIBERAL DEMOCRATS' FILIBUSTER OF REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S JUDICIAL NOMINEES -- WILL CONSERVATIVES COME TO GRIPS WITH THE FACT THAT FIFTY-TWO TRULY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN SENATORS WOULD CONSTITUTE A BETTER & MORE RELIABLE MAJORITY THAN A LARGER SENATE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CONTAINING "MODERATES" READY & WILLING TO BETRAY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY & ITS LEADERSHIP, COLLABORATE WITH LIBERAL LEFTIST DEMOCRATS, & UNDERMINE THE CONSERVATIVE ENDEAVOR TO RESTORE CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY TO THE UNITED STATES COURTS

JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS & PARTISAN POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE:  HOW LIBERAL DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE WORK TO BLOCK APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES WHO WILL UPHOLD THE INTERGITY & TRUE MEANING OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- WHY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS NEED TO MAKE CLEAR THAT THE SENATE FIGHT OVER JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS IS ABOUT PROTECTING & PRESERVING THE BASIC FEATURES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM, INCLUDING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, SEPARATION OF POWERS, CHECKS & BALANCES, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, & POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE & THEIR FILIBUSTER OF THE PRESIDENT'S JUDICIAL NOMINEES:  THE DETERMINATION OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC MINORITY IN THE SENATE TO PREVENT THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES WHO ARE DEDICATED TO UPHOLDING THE INTEGRITY OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION & PRESERVING THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENT -- CONSERVATISM VERSUS LIBERALISM, JUDICIAL RESTRAINT VERSUS JUDICIAL ACTIVISM:  WHETHER THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, AS ENVISIONED BY THE FOUNDERS, WILL PREVAIL OR FADE INTO OBLIVION -- REPUBLICANS MUST STAND FIRM & UNITED IN COUNTERING LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC OBSTRUCTIONISM & IN FIGHTING FOR SENATE CONFIRMATION OF PRO-CONSTITUTION JUDGES

PENNSYLVANIA'S "REPUBLICAN" SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER:  A PRIME EXAMPLE OF A LIBERAL LEFTIST TROJAN HORSE WITHIN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, CALLING HIMSELF A "MODERATE," COLLABORATING WITH PARTISAN LIBERAL DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE, & WORKING TO UNDERMINE THE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY'S EFFORT TO BREAK THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FILIBUSTER OF PRESIDENT BUSH'S JUDICIAL NOMINEES & CONFIRM THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES WHO BELIEVE IN THE RULE OF LAW & WILL UPHOLD THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

U.S. SENATE DECISION-MAKING ON CONFIRMATION OR REJECTION OF A FEDERAL JUDGE NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT -- THE EFFORT OF LEFTWING LIBERAL ADVOCACY GROUPS & DEMOCRATIC PARTY POLITICIANS TO ELEVATE PARTISAN POLITICAL IDEOLOGY TO AN UNPRECEDENTED LEVEL OF CONSIDERATION & DEEMPHASIZE THE JUDICIAL NOMINEE'S ABILITY & WILLINGNESS TO ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL OATH & ADHERE TO THE RULE OF LAW

IN WHAT SENSE IS "JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY" OR "IDEOLOGY" A PROPER & LEGITIMATE CONCERN OF THE U.S. SENATE WHEN DECIDING WHETHER TO CONFIRM OR REJECT THE APPOINTMENT OF A PERSON NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT OR ON SOME OTHER FEDERAL COURT?

SENATE CONFIRMATION OR REJECTION OF PROPOSED FEDERAL JUDGES NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE U.S. COURTS -- SHOULD POLITICAL IDEOLOGY MATTER IN THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES?

THE PROPER ROLE OF THE U.S. SENATE IN THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES -- SENATE CONFIRMATION OF PROPOSED JUDGES NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT:  SHOULD POLITICAL IDEOLOGY BE INJECTED INTO THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS?

TO CONFIRM OR NOT TO CONFIRM -- THE U.S. SENATE'S EXERCISE OF ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO CONFIRM OR REJECT PROPOSED SUPREME COURT JUSTICES NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.:  WHAT CRITERIA SHOULD THE SENATORS USE IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO CONFIRM OR REJECT A NOMINEE

THE UNITED STATES COURTS, JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, & THE JUDICIAL NOMINATION & CONFIRMATION PROCESS -- THE ROLE OF THE U.S. SENATE IN CONFIRMING & REJECTING PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS OF JUDGES TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE FEDERAL BENCH

ABUSE OF THE FILIBUSTER IN CONTROVERSIES OVER U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES -- THE FILIBUSTER'S USE BY A MINORITY FACTION IN THE SENATE TO THWART THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AS EXPRESSED THROUGH A MAJORITY OF THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN THE SENATE

WHY U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES, COUPLED WITH PARTISAN USE OF THE FILIBUSTER TO PREVENT REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS FROM CHOOSING CONSERVATIVE FEDERAL JUDGES, IS A PROCESS THAT IS BROKEN & NEEDS TO BE FIXED