FINAL REPORT OF THE JOINT INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE INQUIRY
PART II: RECOMMENDATIONS
December 10, 2002
Since the National Security Act’s establishment of the Director of Central Intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency in 1947, numerous independent commissions, ex- perts, and legislative initiatives have examined the growth and performance of the U.S. Intelligence Community. While those efforts generated numerous proposals for reform over the years, some of the most significant proposals have not been implemented, par- ticularly in the areas of organization and structure. The two congressional committees participating in this Joint Inquiry--the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence--be- lieve that the cataclysmic events of September 11, 2001, provide a unique and compell- ing mandate for strong leadership and constructive change throughout the Intelligence Community. With that in mind, and based on the work of the Joint Inquiry, the Committees recommend the following:
Congress should amend the National Security Act of 1947 to create and sufficiently staff a statutory Director of National Intelligence who shall be the President’s principal ad- visor on intelligence and shall have the full range of management, budgetary, and per- sonnel responsibilities needed to make the entire U.S. Intelligence Community operate as a coherent whole. These responsibilities should include:
The Director of National Intelligence should be a Cabinet level position, appointed by the President and subject to Senate confirmation. Congress and the President should also work to insure that the Director of National Intelligence effectively exercises these authorities.
To insure focused and consistent Intelligence Community leadership, Congress should require that no person may simultaneously serve as both the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, or as the director of any other specific intelligence agency.
Current efforts by the National Security Council to examine and revamp existing intel- ligence priorities should be expedited, given the immediate need for clear guidance in intelligence and counterterrorism efforts. The President should take action to ensure that clear, consistent, and current priorities are established and enforced throughout the Intelligence Community. Once established, these priorities should be reviewed and up- dated on at least an annual basis to ensure that the allocation of Intelligence Community resources reflects and effectively addresses the continually evolving threat environment. Finally, the establishment of Intelligence Community priorities, and the justification for such priorities, should be reported to both the House and Senate Intelligence Commit- tees on an annual basis.
The National Security Council, in conjunction with the Director of National Intelligence, and in consultation with the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense, should prepare, for the President’s approval, a U.S. government-wide strategy for combating terrorism, both at home and abroad, including the growing terrorism threat posed by the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and associated technologies. This strategy should identify and fully engage those foreign policy, economic, military, intelligence, and law enforcement elements that are critical to a comprehensive blueprint for success in the war against terrorism.
As part of that effort, the Director of National Intelligence shall develop the Intelligence Community component of the strategy, identifying specific programs and budgets and including plans to address the threats posed by Osama bin Ladin and al Qa’ida, Hamas, Hezbollah, and other significant terrorist groups. Consistent with applicable law, the strategy should effectively employ and integrate all capabilities available to the Intelli- gence Community against those threats and should encompass specific efforts to:
The position of National Intelligence Officer for Terrorism should be created on the National Intelligence Council and a highly qualified individual appointed to prepare intelligence estimates on terrorism for the use of Congress and policymakers in the executive branch on the U.S. government and to assist the Intelligence Community in developing a program for strategic analysis and assessments.
Congress and the federal executive administration in the U.S. government should ensure the full development within the Department of Homeland Security of an effective all- source terrorism information fusion center that will dramatically improve the focus and quality of counterterrorism analysis and facilitate the timely dissemination of relevant intelligence information, both within and beyond the boundaries of the Intelligence Com- munity. Congress and the executive administration should ensure that this fusion center has all the authority and the resources needed to:
Given the FBI’s history of repeated shortcomings within its current responsibility for domestic intelligence, and in the face of grave and immediate threats to our homeland, the FBI should strengthen and improve its domestic capability as fully and expeditiously as possible by immediately instituting measures to:
Congress and the executive administration should carefully consider how best to struc- ture and manage U.S. domestic intelligence responsibilities. Congress should review the scope of domestic intelligence authorities to determine their adequacy in pursuing coun- terterrorism at home and ensuring the protection of privacy and other rights guaranteed under the Constitution. This review should include, for example, such questions as whether the range of persons subject to searches and surveillances authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) should be expanded.
Based on their oversight responsibilities, the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees of the Congress, as appropriate, should consider promptly, in consultation with the admin- istration, whether the FBI should continue to perform the domestic intelligence functions of the United States government or whether legislation is necessary to remedy this problem, including the possibility of creating a new agency to perform those functions.
Congress should require that the new Director of National Intelligence, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security report to the President and the Congress on a date certain concerning:
The Attorney General and the Director of the FBI should take action necessary to ensure that:
The House and Senate Intelligence and Judiciary Committees should continue to examine the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and its implementation thoroughly, particularly with respect to changes made as a result of the USA PATRIOT Act and the subsequent decision of the
United States Foreign Intelligence Court of Review, to determine whether its provisions adequately address present and emerging terrorist threats
to the United States. Legislation should be proposed by those Committees to remedy any deficiencies identified as a result of that review.
The Director of the National Security Agency should present to the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense by June 30, 2003, and report to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, a detailed plan that:
In evaluating the plan, the Committees should also consider issues pertaining to whether civilians should be appointed to the position of
Director of the National Security Agency and whether the term of service for the position should be longer than it has been in the recent past.
Recognizing that the Intelligence Community’s employees remain its greatest resource, the Director of National Intelligence should require that measures be implemented to greatly enhance the recruitment and development of a workforce with the intelligence skills and expertise needed for success in counterterrorist efforts, including:
Steps should be taken to increase and ensure the greatest return on this nation’s sub- stantial investment in intelligence, including:
The State Department, in consultation with the Department of Justice, should review and report to the President and the Congress by June 30,
2003, on the extent to which revi- sions in bilateral and multilateral agreements, including extradition and mutual assist- ance treaties, would
strengthen U.S. counterterrorism efforts. The review should address the degree to which current categories of extraditable offenses should be expanded to cover offenses, such as visa and immigration fraud, which may be particularly useful against terrorists and those who support them.
Recognizing the importance of intelligence in this nation’s struggle against terrorism, Congress should maintain vigorous, informed, and
constructive oversight of the Intelli- gence Community. To best achieve that goal, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United
States should study and make recommendations concerning how Congress may improve its oversight of the Intelligence Community, including consideration of such areas as:
The President should review and consider amendments to the Executive Orders, policies and procedures that govern the national security classification of intelligence informa- tion, in an effort to expand access to relevant information for federal agencies outside the Intelligence Community, for state and local authorities, which are critical to the fight against terrorism, and for the American public. In addition, the President and the heads of federal agencies should ensure that the policies and procedures to protect against the unauthorized disclosure of classified intelligence informa- tion are well understood, fully implemented and vigorously enforced.
Congress should also review the statutes, policies and procedures that govern the national security classification of intelligence information and its protection from unauthorized disclosure. Among other matters, Congress should consider the degree to which excessive classification has been used in the past and the extent to which the emerging threat environment has greatly increased the need for real-time sharing of sensitive information. The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Attorney General, should review and report to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees on proposals for a new and more realistic approach to the processes and structures that have governed the designation of sensitive and classified information. The report should include proposals to protect against the use of the classification process as a shield to protect agency self-interest.
Assured standards of accountability are critical to developing the personal responsibility, urgency, and diligence which our counterterrorism responsibility requires. Given the ab- sence of any substantial efforts within the Intelligence Community to impose accounta- bility in relation to the events of September 11, 2001, the Director of Central Intelligence and the heads of Intelligence Community agencies should require that measures de- signed to ensure accountability are implemented throughout the Community. To under- score the need for accountability:
The administration should review and report to the House and Senate Intelligence Com- mittees by June 30, 2003, regarding what progress has been made in reducing the in- appropriate and obsolete barriers among intelligence and law enforcement agencies engaged in counterterrorism,
what remains to be done to reduce those barriers, and what legislative actions may be advisable in that regard. In particular, this report should ad- dress what steps are being taken to insure that perceptions within the Intelligence Com- munity about the scope and limits of current law and policy with respect to restrictions on collection and information sharing are, in fact, accurate and well-founded.
Congress and the administration should ensure the full development of a national watch- list center that will be responsible for coordinating and integrating all terrorist-related watchlist systems; promoting awareness and use of the center by all relevant govern- ment agencies and elements of the private sector; and ensuring a consistent and compre- hensive flow of terrorist names into the center from all relevant points of collection.
The Intelligence Community, and particularly the FBI and the CIA, should aggressively address the possibility that foreign governments are
providing support to or are involved in terrorist activity targeting the United States and U.S. interests. State-sponsored ter- rorism substantially increases the likelihood of successful and more lethal attacks within the United States. This issue must be addressed from a national standpoint and should not be limited in focus by the geographical and factual boundaries of individual cases. The FBI and CIA should aggressively and
thoroughly pursue related matters developed through this Joint Inquiry that have been referred to them for further investigation by these
Committees.
The Intelligence Community should fully inform the House and Senate Intelligence Committees of significant developments in these efforts, through regular reports and additional communications as necessary, and the Committees should, in turn, exercise vigorous and continuing oversight of the Intelligence Community’s work in this critically important area.
NOTE: All references to the Director of National Intelligence in other recommendations assume Recommendation #1 is adopted. In the event there is no Director of National Intelligence created, the Director of Central Intelligence should be substituted for the Director of National Intelligence.
Return to Top of Page
Return to Beginning of
ISLAMIC INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM AT WORK,
Table of Contents
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage