THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume X, Issue # 43, February 16, 2008
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
HUMPTY DUMPTY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES:
Playing Games with Language, Justice, & People's Lives
By Paul K. Driessen
NOTIONS OF "ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE" & THE PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA OF ENVIRONMENTALISTS: PROMOTING
PUBLIC POLICIES THAT PREVENT ECONOMIC GROWTH, RESULT IN UNEMPLOYMENT, & PERPETUATE POVERTY, MISERY,
POOR HEALTH, & PREMATURE DEATH IN POOR COUNTRIES -- HIGH TIME TO REEXAMINE LAWS & PUBLIC POLICIES BASED
ON PERVERSE, DISTORTED CLAIMS OF JUSTICE & ENSURE THAT POLICIES ARE SET BY PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO LIVE WITH
THEIR CONSEQUENCES, NOT BY POLITICAL IDEOLOGUES & ACTIVISTS WHO MERELY IMPOSE THE POLICIES ON OTHER
PEOPLE, & THEN HEAD OFF ON ANOTHER ANTI-DEVELOPMENT CAMPAIGN
FULL STORY:
“Environmental justice” is often used to benchmark corporate social responsibility.
“People of color and low-income populations are disproportionately impacted by pollution,” argues Leslie Fields, Sierra
Club Director of Environmental Justice.
It’s unjust that people lose their jobs when companies merge or downsize, to cut costs or boost profits, activists claim.
“Every time a child dies as a result of floods in Bangladesh, an airline executive should be dragged out of his office and
drowned,” for causing global warming, rants United Kingdom firebrand George Monbiot. Government leaders “should
go to jail” for failing to act more quickly to prevent planetary climate cataclysm, insists Canadian eco-zealot David
Suzuki.
These assertions range from simplistic to outrageous to straight out of Lewis Carroll.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean, neither
more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” Humpty Dumpty replied, “who is to be master. That’s all.”
Indeed, activist terminology often guides public policy, and dictates who is to be master -- those who must live with the
consequences of their personal choices, or those who must live with policies imposed by others. That reality
underscores why policies must be founded on full and fair assessment of risks and benefits, especially to the poor and
powerless, rather than on what advances political agendas.
A few years back, mostly black residents of Convent, Louisiana, welcomed the construction of a modern plastics factory
that would have brought 2,000 construction jobs and 165 permanent positions that paid double the wages of working in
sugar cane fields, plus health benefits and a stronger tax base. The local NAACP also supported the facility.
But Sierra Club activists opposed the plant, claiming Shintech, Inc’s factory might increase allegedly high cancer rates, in
violation of environmental justice principles. The factory was built elsewhere, in a mostly white community, and Convent
remained poor.
Allegations of high cancer rates turned out to be false. In fact, cancer rates might well have declined, because workers
with medical benefits would have discovered the disease in time to get treatment. But activist notions of “environmental
justice” had prevailed. They were the masters, and Convent’s residents never had a choice. By the time the truth came out,
the activists were off lambasting other facilities.
Losing a job is always a wrenching experience. Capitalism’s forces of “creative destruction” are as powerful today as when
horse-and-buggy craftsmen were laid off by automobile makers, and mountains of manure were replaced by exhaust from
internal combustion engines. Mergers and acquisitions fueled by innovation, competition, and profit-seeking clearly create
jobs, though they also destroy jobs.
However, corporate decisions affect a limited number of workers, whereas government policies affect millions. The drive to
eliminate fossil fuels, switch to a CO2-free economy, and prevent computer-generated climate disasters might create some
new jobs, but it would also cost countless jobs and impact families all across America.
European industries are already reevaluating investment decisions and cancelling projects, largely because of an
increasingly strict and unpredictable regulatory climate in the European Union, according to World Energy Council Vice
Chairman Johannes Teyssen. New power plants are being put on hold, threatening to hike electricity prices even further
and exacerbate a growing energy shortfall, and companies are pondering relocation to China and India, as it becomes
harder to get building and expansion permits.
Similar anxieties are increasing in the United States, as Congress considers a dozen tough climate change bills. Not one of
them acknowledges the uncertainties inherent in climate models and predictions of catastrophic warming. Not one
considers recent solar magnetic readings that some researchers fear could reflect a downturn in the sun's energy output,
which could trigger a planetary cold spell, severe weather, and widespread crop failures.
Will legislators and eco agitators be as outraged about widespread job losses caused by such legislation, as they have
been about comparatively minor “injustices” perpetrated by capitalists? Will they restore funding to the FutureGen coal
project that was to evaluate the economic and technological viability of carbon sequestration initiatives on which so much
climate change policy relies?
Will they reverse land use policies that have driven tens of thousands of blacks from San Francisco and other California
cities, and reject proposals to limit how many miles workers can drive each year to get from affordable homes to jobs in
those cities?
Drownings in impoverished Third World countries are tragic, but no more so than far more numerous deaths from malaria,
dysentery, malnutrition, and lung disease among children in those nations. But environmental justice agitators are among
the perpetrators of these unnecessary deaths.
They pressure countries and aid agencies not to use DDT, insecticides or larvacides, causing disease, death and eventual
resistance by mosquitoes to pyrethrum in bednets and by parasites to ACT drugs. They oppose biotech crops and
medicines, which could reduce blindness, malnutrition, intestinal disease and deaths, and enable Third World farmers to
grow more nutritious crops, with less water and fewer pesticides, under widely varied climate conditions.
Eco-alarmists tell impoverished Africans that global warming is the greatest threat they face, doing so when Al Gore uses
more electricity in a week than 100 million Africans together use in a year. Those people rarely or never have electricity and
must burn wood and animal dung, resulting in lung diseases that cause millions of deaths annually. Yet alarmists oppose
fossil fuel power plants, as well as nuclear and hydroelectric projects, thereby guaranteeing that Africa’s poverty and death
toll will continue.
Should we demand that eco-imperialists be jailed or drowned every time children die because of these policies? Certainly
not. But we should demand real environmental justice. We should demand an end to the censorship and intimidation
practiced by the United Nations and by many colleges and universities, as documented by the Foundation for Individual
Rights in Education and Evan Maloney’s provocative film, Indoctrinate U.
We should insist that the United States government begin developing our publicly owned energy resources, as Congress
of Racial Equality Chairman Roy Innis suggests in his new book, Energy Keepers, Energy Killers: The New Civil Rights
Battle.
We should define “environmental justice” to recognize economist Indur Goklany’s finding that “future generations will be
better off in even the richest but warmest” IPCC scenarios, and under worst-case scenarios presented by the Stern Review.
If communities have abundant, affordable energy to sustain economic growth and technology, they will enjoy better health
and be able to adapt to whatever climate changes nature (or humans) might bring.
We need kilowatts, not Killawatts. Moreover, we need reliable, affordable energy, not anti-energy policies that force poor
families to rely on BeggaWatts.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
The Earth's Natural History, Global Climate Changes,
& the Future of Human Life & Civilization on the Planet:
Science, Ideology, & Public Policy
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality, the Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow, and the
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen is author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, which can be
obtained at www.Eco-Imperialism.com. Email: pdriessen@cox.net --- Telephone:
(703) 698-6171
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume X, 2007
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity