THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume X, Issue # 171, July 15, 2008
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
THE RISE OF THE CHECHEN EMIRATE?
By Dr. Dimitry Shlapentokh
FACTIONAL DIVISION WITHIN THE CHECHEN RESISTANCE MOVEMENT: IDEOLOGICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN CHECHEN
NATIONALISTS & ISLAMISTS -- WHAT THE OBJECTIVE OF THE CHECHEN RESISTANCE SHOULD BE: ACHIEVEMENT OF
AN INDEPENDENT & POLITICALLY STABLE CHECHEN STATE MODELED AFTER WESTERN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACIES &
INTEGRATED INTO A FREE & PEACEFUL WORLD, OR TOTAL VICTORY IN A GLOBAL ISLAMIST JIHAD TO DESTROY THE WEST
& ACHIEVE ISLAMIST WORLD DOMINATION IN A WORLDWIDE ISLAMIC CALIPHATE -- A COMPARISON BETWEEN
CONTEMPORARY JIHADISTS & THE BOLSHEVIKS OF AN EARTIER ERA
FULL STORY:
Chechnya has been at war with Russia for generations. By 1999, when the Second Chechen War broke out, two
resistance groups had emerged: nationalists and jihadists. While long simmering below the surface, the schism between
the two camps erupted publicly in 2006 on the Internet, after Akhmed Khalidovich Zakaev, the moderate Foreign
Minister of the shadow Chechen government, argued that the goal of the Chechen resistance should be an independent
Chechen state modeled after Western democracies and integrated into the global community. Movladi Udugov, a jihadist
and Editor of Kavkaz Center, the best-known online resistance publication, vehemently disagreed and declared
that, for real Muslims, spiritual bonds should be more important than blood ties. He argued that he would rather embrace
ethnic Russians who had converted to Islam than Chechens who had strayed from their religion. There was no point in
modeling society after Western states, he contended, because all non-Muslim states, or those that are Muslim only in
name, but not in essence, are corrupt. Instead, Chechens should fight for the establishment of a global caliphate.
In October, 2007, this ideological conflict led to a definitive split when Sheikh Doku (Dokka) Khamatovich Umarov,
shadow President of the Chechen Republic, threw his support behind Udugov. Umarov endorsed the dissolution of the
republic and its replacement by an Islamist "emirate" and argued that Chechens, as Muslims, cannot live outside Islam
and must defend all Muslims. The dispute between Umarov and Zakaev provides insight not only into the future direction
of the Chechen movement, but also into the tactics and strategy of global jihadists and the resistance they face from
nationalist Muslims.
CHECHEN RESISTANCE
Tension in Chechnya existed during the Soviet period and grew through the Gorbachev years. Chechen resistance erupted
openly in 1994. [1] As the First Chechen War (1994-1996) proceeded, the friction between nationalist resistance leaders and
their Islamist counterparts grew. By the start of the Second Chechen War in 1999, jihadists began pressing the Chechen
government. A certain Khanif, a contributor to Chechenpress, argued that the jihadists began to press the Chechen
government almost from the start of the Second Chechen War. In 1999, Aslan Maskhadov, the Chechen President who took
power after the death of Dzjokhar Dudaev in 1996, introduced Islamic law. Three years later, Shamil Salmanovich Basayev
(1965-2006), one of the best-known radical commanders, declared the Chechen state to be a "dead body." [2] The jihadists
apparently had become the leading force in the Chechen resistance and proclaimed that turning to jihad was the only way to
victory. [3]
THE FORMAL SPLIT
The Chechen leadership's divorce was nasty. Both sides sought to delegitimize the other. Umarov, the Islamist, argued
that those who represent the Chechen resistance should be in the Caucasus risking their lives, not enjoying comfort in
exile. He painted Zakaev and his nationalist followers as not only having ceased to be Muslims, but also as pawns of
adventurers like Boris Berezovsky, a corrupt tycoon prominent during the Yeltsin era (1991-1999) who escaped to the
West following Russian President Vladimir Putin's accession. Guilt by association was a frequent theme. Jihadist
websites show Zakaev not only in the company of Berezovsky, but also of Yurii Filshtinskii, a Russian-Jewish émigré
and historian who had coauthored a book with the late Alexander Litvinenko accusing the Russian secret police,
Federal'naya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti (FSB), of staging bombings in several apartment buildings in 1999 to create a pretext
for Russia to launch the Second Chechen War. Indeed, Russian authorities accused Chechens of the bombings. Putin, in
his position as Prime Minister and Yeltsin heir, proclaimed that he would pursue terrorists everywhere and launch a
full-fledged assault on Chechnya.
The jihadist sites also presented Zakaev as an associate of Ramzan Kadyrov, the Putin-appointed Russian viceroy of
Chechnya, and, by extension, an ally of Putin himself.
Zakaev supporters, on the other hand, depicted jihadists as Islamist Bolsheviks, fanatics lacking strategy and indifferent
to ordinary Chechens. Such an accusation resonates among Russians and those living among them: Vladimir Lenin was
indifferent to the outbreak of World War I because, he believed, the misery accompanying that conflict could catalyze
revolution. [4] As Lenin cooperated with anyone — even German Kaiser Wilhelm — to achieve his aims, so too did
Zakaev accuse Umarov of striking bargains with his arch foe Putin. After all, both Putin and the Islamists sought political
gain at the expense of Chechen blood. Abdul-Malik Isaev, a contributor to Chechenpress, explained:
"In 1917, the major ideologists of Bolshevism, following
the bidding and [with] the money received from Germany,
staged a military coup in Russia and proclaimed the words
that became famous: 'Comrades! Revolution, the necessity
of which the Bolsheviks have [fore]told for such a long
time, has finally taken place!' Today in Chechnya, the
events are essentially the same — Dokka [Umarov] has
confirmed his decision to promulgate a 'Caucasian emirate,'
the 'necessity' of which our 'Islamist-radicals' of Bolshevik
'mazhab' have [fore]told for a long time. The traitors of the
Chechen people still await Shari‘a court for their
provocative call for a Dagestan campaign, putting their
knives in the back of our people and our state." [5]
While Lenin believed that only he could interpret Marxism, Umarov and Udugov –– the "green commissars" –– believed
that they alone were the true interpreters of Islam. Many Chechen government officials distanced themselves from
Umarov after his October, 2007, declaration of an emirate. [6] As Foreign Minister, Zakaev declared himself leader of the
Chechen government-in-exile and demanded that Chechen representatives abroad should follow his orders. [7] Umarov's
declaration of an emirate took the Chechen Parliament by surprise; and, after receiving no answer from Umarov to the
question of how he could occupy a position that does not exist in the Chechen Constitution, [8] Zhaloud Lema Sarliapov,
Chairman of the Chechen Parliament, proclaimed that power in the Chechen Republic should belong to Parliament, and not
to the President, who had actually abdicated his position. [9] Others, such as the Chechen veterans of its Russian wars
and a parliamentarian who was also the brother of Chechnya's former Vice President, also took Zakaev's side. Sultan
Asaev, a colonel in the resistance army, said that Chechens who had suffered in fighting the "Fascist dictatorship" should
protest the creation of an "emirate" that would lead to even greater tragedy. [10] Salambek Amaev, a former military
commandant and representative of the Chechen Republic in Poland, also protested. [11]
Zakaev also won the support of the Chechen "Elders," who in traditional society are seen as the ultimate moral authorities.
Alla Dudaev, widow of the first Chechen President, Dzjokhar Dudaev, argued that the promulgation of the emirate was a
betrayal of her martyred husband's life's work. [12] Chechen Elders in Istanbul, Udugov's city of residence, also flocked to
Zakaev's side despite, Udugov's assertions to the contrary. [13] Zakaev also received considerable support from the
approximately half-million strong Chechen diaspora. The consuls of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria and representatives
of the Chechen diaspora stated that, if Umarov believed he needed more titles to engage in the liberation of the Caucasus,
he could just resign from the Presidency of the Chechen Republic and take whatever title he wished. [14]
While Chechnya has newspapers, most are controlled and do not permit open debate. Most Chechens, especially those in
the diaspora, turn to websites for news and to debate ideas. The editorial boards of some Chechen websites dissociated
themselves from Umarov. The board of the Daymohk news agency, which had served since the administration of
former Chechen President Abdul Khalim Sadulaev (2005-2006) as presidential spokesman, severed its connection with
Umarov. [15] The split divided other Internet papers into two camps. While the Chechentimes adopted a
pro-Umarov position, Chechenpress contributor Mairbek Taramov urged readers to be aware that the
Chechentimes had nothing to do with the old Chechen Times, which had been "the vehicle of a
European-oriented group of Chechens." [16]
Lastly, the declaration of the emirate antagonized Chechnya's foreign supporters. Adam Borovskii, Consul of the Chechen
Republic in Poland, proclaimed that he and "his Polish friends" had done their best to liberate Chechnya. But now, after the
promulgation of the emirate, he saw the Chechen leaders identifying themselves with Al-Qa'ida, something with which he
wanted no connection. [17] Zakaev became de facto leader of the Chechen government-in-exile.
DELEGITIMIZING JIHADISTS
Any divorce is difficult. In order to justify the schism to the broader Chechen community, Zakaev developed a number of
arguments to justify his claim to leadership. First, he argued, since Umarov had implicitly abandoned the Presidency, he,
Zakaev, could not be his representative. [18] In Umarov's stead, Parliament should take power.
Second, Zakaev argued that the declaration of the emirate made it impossible to cooperate with Kadyrov's government.
Even before the February, 2007, split, Zakaev had developed the notion that Moscow was losing control over Chechnya
and that Kadyrov's regime had become part of the Chechen opposition. For example, he argued that its security forces and
militia are perhaps 70 to 80 percent former members of the resistance, who uphold Chechen independence in their heart. [19]
Kadyrov's trend toward independence provided the opportunity, Zakaev suggested, for compromise with the moderate
segments of the Chechen resistance. The declaration of the emirate upset any chance at compromise. Udugov and Umarov
wanted, Zakaev implied, a war without end. [20]
Pushing this further, Zakaev put forth a third argument: that Russian intelligence played a role in the declaration of an
emirate. He alleged that the FSB had met with and bribed members of the Chechen resistance; rumors spread that about half
a billion dollars changed hands. [21] These Russian agents, Zakaev said, had convinced Umarov to abrogate the Chechen
Constitution, abolish the Chechen state and proclaim an emirate, thereby giving Moscow justification for war against the
Chechen resistance by arguing that it was fighting against a branch of Al-Qa'ida. [22]
The corruption argument resonated. Larisa Volodimerova, a contributor to Chechenpress, suggested that Udugov
and Putin cynically collaborated to profit at the expense of the Chechen people. [23] Others noted that many jihadist leaders
lived in luxury. Udugov, for example, lived well in Istanbul with his four wives, seemingly with no regard for the families of
jihadists killed and wounded in Chechnya. [24] Chechenpress contributor Turko Dikaev stated, with an air of irony,
that it might turn out that the reason for Umarov's promulgation of the emirate was quite personal and quite petty. Beyond
profit, the move would enable Umarov to purge Zakaev, since a foreign ministry would no longer be necessary. [25]
Most of Zakaev's supporters accepted his arguments. Umarov's desire to build an emirate defied logic. One contributor to
Ichkeria FR — the Internet publication of the Chechen diaspora in France — said that Umarov justified his plan to
create an emirate by arguing it would help Chechens find support for their struggle among the other people of the
Caucasus, although a regional emirate based on Islam rather than nationality would require the dissolution of the Chechen
state. Absent the emirate declaration, Chechens could preserve their own state and strike alliances with the other people of
the Caucasus. [26] Zakaev's backers countered that idea by noting that Umarov's actions would alienate the Chechen
resistance from the major global powers and by suggesting that, even if bribery did not motivate Umarov, he had certainly
overestimated the importance of Islam in Chechen life.
Chechenpress contributor Larisa Volodimerova argued that those who proclaimed the emirate repeated mistakes
made by past Chechen leaders, such as Shamil, who tried to create a theocratic state: They believed that Islam would
solidify the Chechen ranks and make them resolute fighters for independence. But the Islamization of Chechen life and
theocratic despotism led to the opposite result: Chechens resent autocracy, theocratic or otherwise, and chose not to fight
for it. [27] El'mira Magometova, another Chechenpress contributor, argued that Chechens had never regarded Islam
as an essential aspect of their national identity and noted that Islam only came to Chechnya in the Seventeenth Century.
Further, she argued, a major reason for Imam Shamil's defeat in 1859 was Chechens' intolerance toward monarchy; many
assumed Shamil had such ambitions. Another contributor stated that he could, of course, be regarded as a heretic, but he
did not believe the Qur'an could be used as a detailed guide in present-day society: It could only provide a general
outline for behavior. [28] Vakhi Surko, still another Chechenpress contributor, argued that those who promulgated
the emirate and joined the global jihadist movement had alienated the global community. [29] A certain Iskander, a
contributor to Chechenpress, stated that the supporters of the emirate actually said that they intended to engage in
a war with the entire world, which he said is sheer madness. [30] Irchula Shmaiser, another contributor, supported this view.
She stated that the jihadists are mocked as insane because they actually propose jihad without end. [31]
While the emirate's proponents said they were not bothered by the absence of international support — the global
community does not care about Chechen suffering, they argued — Surko countered that, however true, needless
antagonism of the international community was a misstep, since it drew the world closer to Russia because of international
antagonism to Al-Qa'ida and its jihad. But the belief that Putin and Islamists cooperated resonates in the North Caucasus.
Chechen writers blame the 1999 war in Dagestan, launched after terrorists blew up apartment buildings in Moscow and
Volgodonsk, on both Putin and the Islamists. Subsequent Islamist terrorist attacks in Dubrovka and Beslan provided the
Kremlin with justification to continue its war against Chechen civilians. [32] In the view of other Chechenpress
contributors, events suggest a Putin role. [33] "There is a clear understanding that Udugov worked together with the FSB,"
[34] one Chechen writer declared.
Not only might the emirate help Putin justify war against the Chechen resistance, [35] but it could drive a wedge
between Chechnya and the West. [36] The West might be transformed from passive and often sympathetic observers
into Chechnya's enemy and Russia's helper. Even after the September, 2004, school massacre in Beslan, many
Westerners expressed sympathy toward the Chechen cause. [37] Since that attack, there have been no major terrorist
attacks against civilians. Should there be, however, Moscow would be able to link Chechen resistance with
international terrorism. Prior to Udugov's statements, most Americans did not regard the Chechen resistance as part of
the global terrorist movement. [38]
Nor would reliance on global Islamism necessarily help Chechnya. Khanif suggested that the umma, the global
community of Muslims who band together for justice and liberty, is an illusion, existing more in the minds of jihadist
ideologues than in real life. He questioned the assumption that Muslim people and Muslim governments care about
Chechens. The Muslim world is not only disunited, but also corrupt and remains the "old, sinful man." The mythical
heroic umma united for the common struggle is similar to the mythical global proletariat whose heroic faculties and
sense of solidarity exist only in the minds of believers. [39] One contributor to Chechenpress proclaimed that
the Chechen people are more the victims of Islamists than of Putin. [40]
The conflict between Islamists and nationalists is irreconcilable and may lead to internecine violence within the
Chechen resistance. While Zakaev may entrench himself in Europe as a good, "moderate" nationalist, Islamists will
increasingly consolidate the battlefield. Chechnya might be, for them, just a weak link in the global chain of the
"worldwide revolution." While Chechens will form the entirety of the moderate nationalists, the jihadists will embrace
a variety of ethnic groups connected not just with foreign jihadists but with a network of Islamic — and possibly
non-Islamic –– extremists all over Russia. In this way, the Islamist movement in Chechnya parallels the Bolshevik
movement in Russia in the years prior to World War I.
CONCLUSION
What of the implications of the schism within the Chechen movement? Jihadists are unpopular among many in the
Chechen diaspora, most of whom would like to be seen as legitimate political refugees promoting an understandable
cause, rather than representatives of an Al-Qa'ida type movement. Western politicians sympathetic to Chechen
nationalism will certainly side with Zakaev. In embattled Chechnya, quite a few — at least judging by Internet
discussions — might opt for Kadyrov's rule, which provides some modicum of stability and a chance for gainful
employment for Chechen youth. Still, the small but dedicated groups of jihadists will not evaporate because of the lack
of recruits: Regardless of what Chechens think of their cause, jihadists can attract Islamic extremists from across Russia
and around the world.
What would be the implications of the small, dedicated bands of religious zealots in the Caucasus for Russia and
ultimately the world? Here, comparison between Bolsheviks and jihadists is enlightening. Those who study the
Bolshevik movement offer many arguments for its victory. Some credit Lenin's political genius; others, Marxist ideology
or the centralized structure of the party. These elements played important roles, but there is another aspect of the story,
which is the Bolshevik similarity to a religious movement. Bolshevik messianism led the movement to persist, even when
Russia's political and social order was stable. For Lenin, as well as for many other radicals in Europe, the revolution was
just an abstraction. In fact, Russia had not experienced a mass upheaval since the Pugachev rebellion in the late
Eighteenth Century, and Europe had not experienced a major revolution since that of the Paris Commune in 1871. Still,
the Bolsheviks faithfully believed both in their providential mission and in the instability of the global order and
persisted. So, when they appeared to be right, and the global order collapsed in the wake of World War I, they were
quick to take advantage of the opportunity. The same could be said about the jihadists. If Russia remains stable, the
jihadists' influence on Russia and global politics most likely will be marginal. But, if a breakdown happens — what
Russians call katastroika — the extremists and jihadists, like the Bolsheviks before them, will play an important role in
shaping events, at least in the North Caucasus. If this were indeed to happen, the present split in the Chechen resistance
would be seen as important as the split between the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks more than a hundred years ago.
NOTES:
[1] James Hughes, Chechnya, From Nationalism to Jihad (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007), pp. 16-18.
[2] Khanif, "Khimera v. Chechne," Chechennews, Oct. 29, 2007.
[3] Lorenzo Vidino, "How Chechnya Became a Breeding Ground for Terror," Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2005, pp. 57-66.
[4] Christopher Reed, Lenin: A Revolutionary Life (London: Routledge, 2005), p. 107.
[5] Abdul-Malik Isaev, "Pritcha pro otrublennuiu golovu," Chechenpress (Tblisi, Georgia), Dec. 1, 2007.
[6] Amir Dokka, "Declaration of the Caucasian Emirate," Kavkazcenter.com (Grozny, Chechnya; Tblisi, Georgia), Nov. 22, 2007.
[7] "Press-reliz MID CHRI," Chechenpress, Nov. 1, 2007.
[8] "Soobshchenie Press—Sluzhby Parlamenta Chechenskoi Respubliki Ichkeriia," Chechenpress, Nov. 5, 2007.
[9] "Postanovlenie Parlamenta CHRI, No. 1-Bl," Chechenpress, Nov. 6, 2007.
[10] Sultan Asaev, "Obrashchenie," Chechennews, Oct. 28, 2007.
[11] "Zaiavlenie Salambeka Amaeva," Chechennews, Oct. 22, 2007.
[12] Alla Dudaeva, "Obrashchenie k Glave Natsional'noi Sluzhby Informatsii CHRI Movladu Udugovu," Chechennews, Oct. 25, 2007.
[13] Administratsiia CIA, "Chechenpress ob adnoi Udugovskoi fal'shivke," Chechenpress, Nov. 3, 2007.
[14] "Gosudarstvennyi suverenitet i nezavisimost Chechenskoi Respubliki nedelimy, nezyblemy," Ichkeria FR (Paris), Oct. 24, 2007.
[15] "Zaiavlenie Informatsionnogo Agenstva Daymohk," Daymohk (Baku, Azerbaijan), Nov. 3, 2007.
[16] Mairbek Taramov, "Obrashchenie k redaktoram SMI CHRI," Chechenpress, Nov. 4, 2007.
[17] Adam Borovskii, "Ia ni khochu byt' predstavitelem Severokavkazskikh Emiratov," Chechennews, Oct. 26, 2007.
[18] "Zaiavlenie Ministra Inostrannykh Del CHRI," Chechenpress, Oct. 31, 2007.
[19] Akhmed Zakaev, "Kadyrov prodolzhaet politiku dekolonizatsii Chechni-Akhmed Zakaev," Caucasus Times.com (Prague), Feb. 27, 2007.
[20] Akhmed Zakaev, "Sdelat' takoe zaiavlenie bylo moim dolgom," Chechenpress, Nov. 1, 2007.
[21] Rava Prezhnii, "U menia takoe vpechatlenie chto menia lishili Rodiny," Chechenpress, Nov. 5, 2007.
[22] "Zaiavlenie Ministerstva Inostrannykh Del CHRI," Ichkeria FR, Oct. 21, 2007.
[23] "Kruglyi stol. Zasedanie pervoe," Chechenpress, Oct. 30, 2007.
[24] Rubati Mitsaev Laramtsa, "Nas ne nado uchit'," Chechenpress, Nov. 2, 2007.
[25] Turko Dikaev, "Zabludshie i pribludshie," Chechenpress, Nov. 1, 2007.
[26] Musa Taipov, "Kakoe gosudarstvo my stroim?" Ichkeria FR, Nov. 5, 2007.
[27] Larisa Volodimerova, "Sovremennaia istoriia khorosho zabytoe staroe," Chechenpress, Oct. 30, 2007.
[28] "Kruglyi stol. Zasidanie pervoe," Chechenpress, Oct. 30, 2007.
[29] Vakhi Surko, "Vrag v mecheti," Chechenpress, Oct. 30, 2007.
[30] Iskander, "Pis'mo Amiru Chechni," Chechenpress, Nov. 5, 2007.
[31] Irchula Shmaiser, "Romanticheskoe puteshestvie," Chechenpress, Nov. 1, 2007.
[32] Prosto Chechenets iz Groznogo, Seichas Zhitel' Strasburga, "Sukiny deti," Chechenpress, Nov. 6, 2007.
[33] David Kudykov, "Vremia ispytaniia na zrelost'," Chechenpress, Nov. 2, 2007.
[34] "Kto otdaet prikazy?" Chechenpress, Nov. 6, 2007.
[35] "Kruglyi stol. Zasedanie pervoe," Chechenpress, Oct. 30, 2007.
[36] "V itoge k chemu ia prishel?" Daymohk, Nov. 9, 2007.
[37] See, for example, Richard Pipes, "Give the Chechens a Land of Their Own," The New York Times, Sept. 9, 2004.
[38] Nadezhda Banchik, "O palachakh i zhertvakh, ili o sukinykh detiakh i sukinykh (krestnykh) ottsakh," Chechenpress, Nov. 9, 2007.
[39] Khanif, "Khimera v Chechne," Chechennews, Oct. 29, 2007.
[40] Vladimir Krapivinsky, "Kogo nam vsem blagodarit' za Vtoruiu voiny?" Chechenpress, Nov. 8, 2007.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Russia & Other Former Soviet Republics
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East
International Politics & World Disorder:
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security
U.S. National Security Strategy
A native of Russia, Dr. Dimitry Shlapentokh is a specialist in Russian political history, with particular expertise on the Bolshevik
Revolution. He holds a Ph.D from the University of Chicago (1988), an M.A. from Michigan State University (1980), and an M.A.
from the University of Moscow (1973). Currently, he is Associate Professor of History at Indiana University, South Bend. In the
past, he has served as Fellow and Visiting Scholar at the Hoover Institution, the Hudson Institute, Harvard University, and
Columbia University. Dr. Shlapenstokh is the author of The Proto-Totalitarian State (2007), Russia Between East and
West (2006), East Against West (2005), and several other books. He is also the author of numerous journal and
magazine articles.
The foregoing article by Dr. Shlapenstokh was originally published in the Middle East Quarterly, Summer, 2008, and
can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum, a foreign policy think tank which seeks to
define and promote American interests in the Middle East, defining U.S. interests to include fighting radical Islam,
working for Palestinian Arab acceptance of the State of Israel, improving the management of U.S. efforts to promote
constitutional democracy in the Middle East, reducing America's energy dependence on the Middle East, more robustly
asserting U.S. interests vis-ŕ-vis Saudi Arabia, and countering the Iranian threat.
(Article URL: http://www.meforum.org/article/1931)
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
July 15, 2008
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume X, 2007
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity