REBUILDING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR 2010
By Christopher G. Adamo
Those Democrats who had expected to ram through an agenda that would fundamentally alter the makeup of the American nation are finding out that their task may not be so easy as initially expected. Admittedly, too many Conservatives had pulled their punches during the past eight years in deference to President George Bush, who, all too often, used his position to undermine his supporters, while trying, in vain, to find common ground with the opposition.
But now, with Bush gone and the Democrats holding both houses of Congress, as well as the White House, few Conservatives outside of Washington are feeling any need to soft-peddle their concerns in order to maintain coherency with GOP “moderates.” Recognizing the need to play political hardball with an increasingly militant Liberal ruling class, the Conservative base no longer has any intention of being restrained by the failed appeasement tactics of the Republican Party elitist establishment.
Unfortunately, that very Republican elitist establishment may be the last group to figure this out. Far too many of its key players remain wedded to the idea of “bipartisanship” with a Democratic Party Liberal Leftist political machine that clearly intends to dismantle the very precepts of America’s greatness. In a twisted variation of the “half-full/half-empty” conundrum, many among the GOP inner circle, or elite, continue to embrace the very concepts that have infuriated voters and spelled electoral disaster for Republicans in the past two elections.
When seeking to establish a political strategy, it is crucial to understand that the beauty-queen syndrome, by which all newly elected Presidents reap a brief boost in public opinion polls, bears no correlation to the national popularity of any government program or new public policy. This is particularly true in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, whose media-driven numbers soared briefly into the stratosphere, but merely represented an emotional reaction to the novelty of a new and “politically correct” chief executive. But, as the dismal reality of his ideological inclination sets in, his numbers have plummeted almost as dramatically as they had risen.
In truth, this drop in the public opinion polls is far more significant than the previous rise, given that it is occurring in the midst of an ongoing orgy of media sycophancy that has not ceased since the day Obama received the Democratic Party nomination. Yet, inside the Beltway, even among those in Obama’s own camp, the turning tide of public sentiment has not gone unnoticed, even if it is still wrongly interpreted.
Amid all of the media accolades, America may have become smitten with Obama’s supposedly smooth style, and it may have briefly bought into all of the self-congratulatory rhetoric of some supposed triumph over past racial disparities (though the treatment of race in this whole episode by the political Left actually reflects a tasteless retrograde focus on quotas to a far greater degree than representing any noble societal milestone). But, day-by-day, the relevance of the racial tokenism and overblown media assertions of his legendary charisma recede in importance, and the significance of the policies of Barack Obama and the Democrats advance excruciatingly towards center stage.
In such an arena, truly Conservative Republicans are presented with a golden opportunity to reclaim their party from their insipid “establishment” counterparts, and rework it into a vibrant and inspiring political force that can reassert the greatness of America, both in its international relations and in its domestic culture. This possibility is real, but it cannot be pursued by a political class that maintains its strategy of sitting on the fence, and responding to every ensuing outrage from the Democrats by countering with watered down versions of the same abhorrent things.
The current public outrage over the bonuses being paid to AIG executives is a perfect case in point. These bonuses, unwarranted though many may contend them to be, are minuscule in comparison to other monies that have been flagrantly misspent by the current Democratic-controlled Congress and the Obama administration. Yet, by fanning the flames of indignation over this situation and thus providing a very effective distraction, the whole AIG bonus controversy is proving far more harmful to taxpayers, in that it allows the government spending orgy to continue in countless other areas with comparatively little scrutiny, and to a degree vastly exceeding the $165 million the company allocated to executive bonuses.
For example, the portion of the fraudulently named “stimulus” package specified to “ACORN,” an organization devoted to the remaking of America according to the principles of Karl Marx, was approximately four billion dollars. That amount is twenty-five times greater than the entirety of the AIG bonuses. Yet, little was heard from those pontificating politicians about a truly abominable expenditure of taxpayer money that will ultimately be devoted to a coordinated dismantling of traditional America.
Political hacks who are sermonizing about the evils of AIG policy, but who remained silent during the “stimulus” debate, are hardly displaying any real concern for America or its economic viability. Rather, they offer incontrovertible proof of their hypocrisy, and their ultimate concern for the fortification of the political establishment, at the expense of the rest of the nation.
Yet, in the midst of this mire, some Conservative rising stars are beginning to shine. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has very loudly decried the expenditures, and even engaged in the unheard of behavior of refusing funding from Washington. South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford had done likewise, but on an even larger scale. In the midst of this sell-out of America, a few resolute and principled individuals are proving that neither they, nor their country’s future, is up for sale.
The Republican Party can and must divest itself of the disastrous former “bipartisan” entanglements with the Democrats. It must resolutely communicate its opposition to the out of control spending practices of the current regime. And it must stay unabashedly on message despite the inevitable firestorm of criticism and antagonism from the Left. By doing so, it will realize an enormous advantage during the next election cycle.
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
-------------------------
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Liberalism
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer and staff writer for the New
Media Alliance. He lives in southeastern Wyoming. He has been active in
local and state politics for many years and is a managing partner in Best
American Buy (www.bestamericanbuy.com), an e-commerce business that markets
products exclusively made in America. His contact information and archives
can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 *
American Government 3 *
American Government 4
American Government 5 *
American Politics *
Anglosphere *
Arabs
Arms Control & WMD *
Aztlan Separatists *
Big Government
Black Africa *
Bureaucracy *
Canada *
China *
Civil Liberties *
Communism
Congress, U.S. *
Conservative Groups *
Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law *
Counterterrorism *
Criminal Justice *
Disloyalty *
Economy
Education *
Elections, U.S. *
Eminent Domain *
Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World *
Ethnicity & Race *
Europe *
Europe: Jews
Family Values *
Far East *
Fiscal Policy, U.S. *
Foreign Aid, U.S. *
Foreign Policy, U.S.
France *
Hispanic Separatism *
Hispanic Treason *
Human Health *
Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. *
Intelligence, U.S. *
Iran *
Iraq *
Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat *
Islamism *
Israeli vs. Arabs *
Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism *
Jihad Manifesto I *
Jihad Manifesto II *
Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments *
Judiciary, American *
Latin America *
Latino Separatism
Latino Treason *
Lebanon *
Leftists/Liberals *
Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. *
Marriage & Family *
Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs *
Middle East: Iran *
Middle East: Iraq *
Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon *
Middle East: Syria *
Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey *
Militant Islam *
Military Defense *
Military Justice
Military Weaponry *
Modern Welfare State *
Morality & Decency
National Identity *
National Security *
Natural Resources *
News Media Bias
North Africa *
Patriot Act, USA *
Patriotism *
Political Culture *
Political Ideologies
Political Parties *
Political Philosophy *
Politics, American *
Presidency, U.S.
Private Property *
Property Rights *
Public Assistance *
Radical Islam
Religion & America *
Rogue States & WMD *
Russia *
Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason *
Senate, U.S. *
Social Welfare Policy *
South Africa
State Government, U.S. *
Subsaharan Africa *
Subversion *
Syria *
Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 *
Treason & Sedition *
Tunisia *
Turkey *
Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity *
UN & Its Agencies *
USA Patriot Act *
U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure *
U.S. Intelligence *
U.S. Senate *
War & Peace
Welfare Policy *
WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor