THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XI, Issue # 178, August 24, 2009
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
TAXPAYER CASH FOR CLUNKER IDEAS -- FIRST CARS, NEXT POWER PLANTS:
WASTING NATURAL RESOURCES TO PROMOTE ECOLOGICAL IDEOLOGIES
By Paul K. Driessen
THE ENVIRONMENTALIST MOVERNMENT, THE POLITICAL LEFT, & THE IMPENDING ADOPTION & IMPLEMENTATION OF VERY
BAD PUBLIC POLICIES: ENVIRONMENTALISTS, GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS, & THEIR POLITICAL ALLIES IN
CONGRESS & THE PRESIDENCY POISED TO LOCKUP AMERICA'S ENERGY SOURCES & WRECK THE AMERICAN ECONOMY --
PROMOTING THE IDEOLOGY & POLICY AGENDA OF POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM -- FURTHERING THE SPECIAL INTERESTS
OF T. BOONE PICKENS, TED TURNER, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION, & OTHERS SEEKING TO ENRICH THEMSELVES AT
THE EXPENSE OF THE GENERAL TAXPAYING AMERICAN PUBLIC -- ENDEAVORING TO ENHANCE & PERPETUATE THE
POLITICAL POWER OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY RADICAL FAR LEFT, & THE OVERALL
LIBERAL LEFTIST POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT
FULL STORY:
It’s finally been euthanized (or so they say). But, in the minds of politicians and rent-seekers, the cash-for-clunkers
program was so successful that it deserved billions in taxpayer money.
Politicians got to strut their green credentials. Car makers got to sell cars, via yet another subsidy. Consumers got
free cash from hapless taxpayers, for new cars many otherwise wouldn’t have bought.
It was all so socially responsible and win-win – except for those poor taxpayers, who got saddled with still more debt.
The other big loser, of course, is the antiquated notion that public policies should be based on sound science and
economics.
An ice-cold bucket of reality is in order – before the next clunker idea comes along. Here are a few of the more
obvious problems with pulling the plug on grandma cars.
The “high-polluting” cars that taxpayers are paying to get off the road already have 95% fewer emissions than
1970-era models. So the pollution reductions are almost nonexistent.
The gas savings are modest, at best, across the U.S. automotive fleet – and will be more than offset by the latest
round of oil and gas lock-ups that Congress and the White House are already engineering. So, more oil imports are
on the way, regardless.
Far worse, every “clunker” has to be rendered totally inoperable. Sodium silicate gets poured into engines to freeze
their components, then they’re crushed into bundles of scrap.
That means some 750,000 perfectly good cars never make it to used car lots. People who can’t afford the average
$24,000 new car price have to buy a new car anyway. Used car dealers and buyers have dwindling numbers of cars
to bargain for. Repair shops lose business.
Even worse, trashing all these cars is a monumental waste of precious resources – and all the energy and effort it
took to extract metallic ores, hydrocarbons and other raw materials from the Earth, process and refine them, create
alloys and plastics, and turn them into engines, chasses, windows, tires, and interiors.
Every step in that process took enormous amounts of energy – and emitted vast quantities of carbon dioxide, other
greenhouse gases, and real pollutants. There is absolutely no way that these emissions and energy will ever be
recouped by any savings the replacement cars might conceivably generate.
It’s like spending $720,000 for photovoltaic solar panels on the roof of the Denver Nature and Science Museum. The
panels would certainly reduce conventional electricity bills. But it would take 110 years to save enough on those
bills to pay for the panels – and the panels would only last 25 years.
Denver installed the panels for one reason, observes Independence Institute investigative journalist Todd Shepherd.
Federal taxpayers provided a fat subsidy – enabling President Obama to have a great photo-op on the museum roof
and shill for solar power, with the Rocky Mountains resplendent in the distance.
So much for that win-win scenario. The next clunker boondoggle is already on the launch pad, courtesy of T. Boone
Pickens and Ted Turner. As they opined in the Wall Street Journal recently, they want to repeat the
automotive “success” on a massive scale – replacing “clunker” electrical generating plants with government
mandated gas-fired versions.
The existing plants burn coal, which America has in great abundance, and which keeps electricity reliable and
affordable – so that people can heat and cool their homes, industries can manufacture and transport products,
companies can employ workers, hospitals can treat patients, schools can train future innovators, and America can
ensure continued opportunity and prosperity.
Modern coal-fired power plants already scrub out the vast majority of real pollutants that their aged predecessors
emitted, notes air quality expert Joel Schwartz. What they don’t remove is carbon dioxide.
Pickens, Turner, Gore, Hansen, and Obama insist that CO2 is causing “potentially devastating climate changes.”
Thousands of scientists disagree, and satellite data clearly demonstrate that global temperatures have been stable
or even decreasing since 1998, even as carbon dioxide levels have risen steadily. Storms, droughts, floods and
other events are in accord with historic variations, and show no statistically significant upswings, note climate
experts William Gray, David Legates, and Richard Keen.
But inconvenient facts and observations are irrelevant to climate alarmists. They apparently believe that assuming,
asserting, decreeing, and modeling climate disasters proves a crisis is nigh – and we must make painful energy,
economic, and lifestyle sacrifices to prevent it.
In other words, force America to eliminate existing generators and switch to power plants running on natural gas
that Boone Pickens, Chesapeake Energy, and a few others own in abundance – and to wind and solar power that
General Electric, Vesta, and other “ethical” companies will happily provide, if taxpayers fork over billions more in
subsidies.
Making money by selling natural gas, building wind turbines and solar panels, and trading carbon credits on new
commodities, hedge fund, and derivatives markets is an irrelevant coincidence, we’re supposed to believe.
These “socially responsible” rent seekers and their friends in Congress and the White House are masters at
increasing and mandating demand for natural gas – for transportation, homes, industries and power generation.
Unfortunately, the friends aren’t so attentive to the supply side of the equation. They excel at locking up America’s
onshore and offshore energy prospects, and imposing burdensome new regulations on lands that aren’t off limits –
making it increasingly difficult to find and produce gas.
This increases demand, shrinks supplies, drives up prices, and increases profits for the lucky few who do own
abundant gas supplies. Once again, consumers and taxpayers get taken for a ride.
Once again, it’s even worse from an economic, ecological, and resource conservation perspective. We are being
asked to destroy dozens or hundreds of perfectly good coal-fired power plants – or retrofit them under expensive
carbon capture and storage mandates – simply because some special interests assume, assert, decree, and model
global warming disasters.
Tearing the plants down would be a monumental waste of the resources, energy, effort, and emissions it took to
build them. CCS technology would require billions of dollars, 25% of a power plant’s generating capacity, major
increases in fuel consumption and electricity prices, thousands of miles of CO2 pipelines and massive
underground storage chambers, to reduce global CO2 by an imperceptible amount.
What America has today is government by lawyers, ideologues, social engineers, and rent seekers. Congress has
nary a real engineer, and precious few members with any business background or ability to figure out basic
cradle-to-grave energy, resource, economic, and pollution equations. U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi thinks
natural gas is an “alternative to fossil fuels.”
With these folks at the helm, it may be time for wise investors to look toward China and India, where reducing
poverty and improving living standards guide public policy – not Hollywood movies about Climate Armageddon.
Wise voters and taxpayers will join the Tea Party movement, and elect some honest brainpower, before Congress
wreaks more havoc on energy, jobs, and civil rights.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow and Congress of
Racial Equality, and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power • Black Death.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XI, 2009
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity