THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XI, Issue # 194, November 9, 2009
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
EXTREME ACTIVISTS TAKE THE REINS AT EPA
By Alex Avery & Dennis T. Avery
THE EPA & THE POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTALISM: LEFTWING POLITICAL OPERATORS CURRENTLY IN CONTROL OF
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY & WORKING TO MAINTAIN THEIR ALLIANCE WITH THE ENVIRONMENTALIST
MOVEMENT, ARE DETERMINED TO ELIMINATE USE OF THE HERBICIDE ATRAZINE IN U.S. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION --
THE PROBABLE CONSEQUENCE: HIGHER FOOD PRICES, MORE SOIL EROSION, LESS SUSTAINABLE FARMING, & MORE
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
FULL STORY:
The Environmental Protection Agency, in a George Orwellian move, has just announced that it has suddenly decided to
put the herbicide atrazine through yet another regulatory wringer, despite having just completed a comprehensive,
multi-year regulatory review of the safety of atrazine begun in 1994. Only three months ago, the EPA announced that after
reviewing hundreds of scientific studies, atrazine “is not likely to cause cancer in humans” and does not affect the
reproductive development of frogs and other amphibians. Atrazine has been used safely for more than 50 years in the
U.S.A. and has been upheld as safe by the World Health Organization and the governments of Canada, France, the
United Kingdom, and other sovereign states.
The timing suggests that politics is the overriding concern. Atrazine was already slated for a 2010 human health review,
but no such headline impact has ever been found. The new team didn’t dare bet on finding a human health flaw now.
Instead, they decided to re-do the just-completed review process, betting that they can produce enough new smoke to
deregister atrazine on some lesser charge. Since the review process still requires a series of expert review panels, EPA
needed to start immediately or risk losing their Obama chance.
Atrazine is one of the most widely used herbicides, helping farmers control weeds, while protecting topsoil from erosion
via no-plow and other conservation cropping methods. Without herbicides, farmers must use plows and other bare-earth
weed control methods that lead to far greater soil erosion and far more fossil fuel use. Atrazine is a critical tool in the
no-plow revolution: it helps combat resistance to other weed killers, maintain high soil organic carbon levels in our fields
(supposedly something the EPA promotes) and protects rivers and streams from sediment pollution (another
environmental good). Economic studies show atrazine provides more than $2 billion in direct economic benefits to our
nation, even beyond the benefits in soil sustainability and stream pollution prevention.
So, why should you care if farmers lose atrazine? Because it will mean higher food costs, more soil erosion, less sustainable
farming, and more environmental degradation. It’ll mean putting more of our farming eggs in fewer baskets. As we’ve
learned with the unwelcome, but inevitable, return of bed bugs to our major cities, needlessly eliminating pesticides from
society’s toolbox leaves us more vulnerable to the scourges of nature.
With world population still growing and overall food demand set to double over the next 40 years, we need all the farming
tools we have (and more) just to keep our heads above the rising tide of farm product demand. We’re all in this struggle
together and the farmer’s loss hits our environment and pocketbooks.
The atrazine witch hunt is being driven primarily by the Natural Resources Defense Council, a powerful eco-activist group
that simply won’t take no for an answer. Review after review by the EPA, starting in the 1980s, has found that atrazine poses
no health risk to humans or other risk to wildlife. Yet the NRDC knows that actual evidence is simply unnecessary; all they
need is enough concocted public fear to cow the EPA into reacting to the politics.
They’ve done it before. Nearly twenty years ago, the NRDC perpetrated one of the biggest scams ever on the American
public, claiming that a product called alar, used in growing apples, was the “most potent cancer-causing agent in our food
supply.” NRDC ranted that alar was a “cancer-causing agent used on food that the EPA knows is going to cause cancer for
thousands of children.” Alar, it turns out, was far less a cancer risk than tap water or peanut butter, as the EPA’s own
Scientific Advisory Panel finally ruled.
Why did NRDC perpetrate the fraud? According to boasts from the NRDC’s public relations firm, it was all an elaborate
(and highly successful) fundraising scheme. When their lies were exposed — sadly too late to save mass parental anguish
over supposedly poisonous apple juice or to save apple farmers tens of millions in market losses — the NRDC equivocated.
“We never said there was an immediate danger,” they said as they laid blame on journalists who “muddled” their report and
the public who “overreacted.”
The NRDC is now trying to do to atrazine what they did to alar. Make no mistake, the NRDC (and current political operators
within the EPA) will continue to go back to the scientific wishing well until they “frighten” the EPA into banning atrazine.
This time around, the herbicides makers and corn farmers aren’t backing down. Will we stand up with them for sound science,
or allow the further politicization of our regulatory agencies?
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Agriculture, the Economy, & Human Health & Welfare:
Policy Issues Relating to Food Production & Consumption
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Dennis T. Avery is an environmental economist and Senior Fellow for the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C. Alex Avery
is Director of Research and Education at the Hudson Institute’s Center for Global Food Issues. Readers may email them at
cgfi@hughes.net
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XI, 2009
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity