THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XII, Issue # 173, August 26, 2010
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
HOW I LEARNED TO LOVE THE BOMB
By Alan Caruba
THE PROBLEM WITH U.S. RATIFICATION OF & COMPLIANCE WITH A TREATY BANNING FUTURE NUCLEAR TESTS &
REDUCING AMERICA'S ARSENAL OF OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS: SUCH A TREATY WOULD TAKE THE U.S.A.
DOWN A DANGEROUS PATH. FOR SIXTY-FIVE YEARS, THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THE AMERICAN NATION HAS
DEPENDED UPON A STRONG NUCLEAR DETERRENT. THE ANTI-NUCLEAR TREATY WOULD WIPE OUT THIS PROVEN
DEFENSE POLICY, REPLACING IT WITH A POLICY OF WEAKNESS.
FULL STORY:
As a child in the 1950s, I learned how to “duck and cover” in order to protect myself from an atomic bomb explosion. Little
did I know that the instruction should have been “Kiss your asterisk goodbye.”
The Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when the Soviets wanted to put nuclear-tipped long range missiles there, led to a
confrontation between U.S. President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Communist Party First Secretary Nikita Krushchev that
had both sides changing their underwear after it was over.
What do the United States, Great Britain, France, Russia, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea in common? They all have
nuclear weapons and, of course, Iran has been working toward that goal and is now very close to achieving it.
Some will argue that Israel should not be on the list because it has never acknowledged its nuclear capabilities, but
everyone knows they have them. Presumably, the Iranian mullahs do as well, but they are a bunch of nuts waiting for the
mythical Twelfth Imam to come out of a well and smite the enemies of Islam.
It is instructive that both Pakistan and India acquired their nuclear weapons without anyone being aware of it until after the
fact. At U.S. Central Intelligence Agency headquarters, when India announced its successful test, it came as a very big
surprise. These days, the U.S.A. is busy reassuring Israel that Iran is “at least a year away” from nuclear status and you can
imagine how relieved they are to hear that.
North Korea is a wild card and, given the lack of success the U.S.A. and anyone else has had to get them to abandon their
nukes, the same can be assumed for Iran when they make their announcement. Meanwhile, they have to content themselves
with announcing new missiles, the latest of which they dubbed “the ambassador of death.”
The Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization has designated Sunday, August 29, 2010, as
“The International Day against Nuclear Tests.” Given the total lack of success in thwarting any nation that wants a nuke,
my confidence in the United Nations’ treaty is zero.
The International Atomic Energy Agency, a UN component, has been kicked out of North Korea, Iraq, and Iran on several
occasions, so one might rationally assume it is useless when it comes to stopping the manufacture of A-bombs.
Olli Heinonen, the former chief of UN nuclear inspections worldwide, told Le Monde, a French newspaper, that Iran
has stockpiled enough low-enriched uranium for 1-2 nuclear arms, but he thought doing so made no sense. Betting on the
rationality of the Iranian ayatollahs is not a good idea.
Who doesn’t want a ban on nuclear weapons testing? The United States Senate, for one.
While the U.S.A. has “signed” a number of the test ban treaties that have been around since the 1960s, the U.S. Senate has
not ratified any of them, thus avoiding having to commit the nation to no longer testing new nuclear weapons. For some
reason, the U.S. Senate does not trust Russia or the other nuke nations.
In April, 2010, our ever-hopeful President Barack Hussein Obama journeyed to Russia to sign a nuclear arms reduction
treaty with Russian Federation President Dmitry Medvedev, the treaty dubbed “New Start.” For Obama it was another
empty photo opportunity on a par with accepting the Nobel Peace Prize (soon to be available everywhere in boxes of
Cracker Jack). For the Russians it was a reason to break out the vodka.
Robert R. Monroe, a retired vice admiral in the U.S. Navy and Director of the Defense Nuclear Agency from 1977-1980,
explains why: “The treaty has many problems from being unverifiable to giving Russia virtual veto power over U.S. missile
defense, and more.” That’s bad enough, but it’s worse than that.
Two days before meeting with the Russians, the Obama administration released its Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Monroe
says:
“The NPR is joined at the hip with New Start, and together
they take this country down a dangerous path. For 65 years,
the very existence of our nation has depended upon a
strong nuclear deterrent. The new NPR wipes out this
proven policy, substituting one of weakness in its place.”
Liberals love test ban treaties. They love the idea of unilaterally disarming the United States in a world where there are
nations who may not love us.
Not surprisingly, the nations with nukes have not signed onto anything that would take away their deterrent factor and,
of course, Iran is hell-bent on getting them for itself.
Not a single conflict since the U.S.A. dropped two A-bombs on Japan in 1945 to end a war they started has used nuclear
weapons. Rational people, even if they have nuclear weapons, know that using them is probably suicidal. Irrational
people like the Iranian ayatollahs are probably the exception.
(c) Alan Caruba, 2010
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Military Weaponry & International Security:
Weapons of Mass Destruction & Arms Control
U.S. Military Defense & National Security
International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security
Page Two
Page One
Alan Caruba writes a daily post at http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com. An author, commentator and business and science writer,
he is the Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about "scare campaigns" designed to influence
public opinion and public policy.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XII, 2010
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity