THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XII, Issue # 217, October 8, 2010
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE EN ESPANOL:
Liberal Latino Pressure Groups' Campaign Will
Drive up Energy Prices, Kill Jobs, & Hurt Families
By Reverend Sam Rodrigues
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, PRESSURE-GROUP POLITICS, ENVIROMENTALISM, & THE WELFARE OF LATINOS IN THE
U.S.A.: AN INCREASINGLY COMMON TACTIC BEING EMPLOYED BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION:
WORKING IN TANDEM WITH HIGHLY ORGANIZED LEFTWING SEGMENTS OF RACIAL & ETHNIC MINORITY GROUPS TO
GENERATE LETTERS, PRESS RELEASES, CONFERENCES, & OTHER SUPPORT FOR OBAMA'S EXPENSIVE, SUBSIDIZED,
JOB-KILLING CLIMATE CHANGE & RENEWABLE ENERGY PROGRAMS -- A COUNTER-TACTIC DESIGNED TO HELP AMERICAN
VOTERS, ESPECIALLY THOSE IN THE LATINO & OTHER RACIAL & ETHNIC MINORITY COMMUNITIES, UNDERSTAND HOW
THEY WILL ACTUALLY BE HURT BY THE SOCALLED "ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE" PUBLIC POLICY INITIATIVES
FULL STORY:
Nineteen Latino Liberal Left activist groups recently asked the U.S. Congress and President Barack Obama to oppose
any attempts to delay or scale back proposed Environmental Protection Agency air pollution and climate regulations.
The Leftist groups’ letter cites EPA claims that “rising temperatures caused by human activities” would lead to higher
levels of ground-level ozone, the main ingredient in smog. This they assert, again citing EPA claims, would lead to
health problems in cities with large Hispanic populations, because low-income and minority communities are often less
able to pay costs associated with heat-related health threats.
Therefore, they argue, any legislation that affects the proposed Clean Air Act initiatives “will severely jeopardize” public
health and productivity in our communities. These initiatives are needed to ensure “environmental justice” and avoid
“disproportionate impacts” from climate change in minority communities, by emphasizing renewable energy, better
weatherization, and “green jobs.”
My organization, the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, represents over 25,000 congregations and 16
million Hispanic Evangelical Christians. We were not consulted or asked to sign the letter. If we had been, we would have
offered some very different insights and perspectives.
First, the legislative actions alluded to in the letter result from Congress’s failure to enact climate change, cap-and-trade,
and energy legislation. The House of Representatives did pass a complex, partisan, thousand-page monstrosity that no
one read before legislators narrowly approved it. A similar bill died in the Senate, as the public began to rebel over its
scope, growing scientific questions about “dangerous global warming,” and previous hurried votes on unread stimulus
and healthcare bills whose hidden costs and regulatory landmines became apparent only after President Obama signed
them into law.
EPA intends to use the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide – and thus major energy users, CO2 emission sources,
and huge sectors of the American economy – in the absence of congressional action, based on its assertion that this
vital plant-fertilizing gas somehow “endangers human health and welfare.”
Many members of Congress, many states, and numerous citizens are loath to give a single federal agency such vast
powers. They insist that any such decision must be debated fully and openly, subjected to high standards of scientific
evidence – and read carefully by lawmakers and voters, prior to any vote.
Second, many of the assertions made in the Latino activists’ letter and EPA documents are questionable, convoluted,
or based on a deplorable lack of understanding of energy, health, and economic realities.
Yes, poor families, including many Hispanics, find it hard to pay for healthcare, including heat-related problems.
However, driving up the cost of energy (and thus the cost of literally everything we eat, make, drive, and do), impairing
job creation and retention, and virtually ensuring brownouts and blackouts in the midst of heat waves and cold snaps,
would undermine the very health, economic, and environmental justice goals the Latino groups claim to champion.
Global warming could arguably increase Summer temperatures and heat waves. However, heat-related health problems
would become far worse, if families cannot afford air conditioning or wind-generation makes their electricity as
unreliable as in many Third World countries. Those conditions would make even a 0.01 degree rise in average global
temperature deadly.
Moreover, far more people die during the Winter, especially when they cannot afford adequate heat. For millions of
Hispanic and other minority families that live in our northern states, this would become a serious health threat, because
the proposed EPA rules would dramatically increase heating costs. Worse, they would do so for little health or
environmental benefit, because automobile, factory, and power plant emissions have already been reduced way below
1970 levels – and most mercury emissions and microscopic soot now come from volcanoes, forest fires, and overseas
sources.
Although atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have been rising steadily, even scientists who worry about “dangerous”
warming now acknowledge that there has been no warming since 1995. This undermines EPA’s claim that carbon
emissions pose a health threat. And, even if the United States eliminated nearly all its CO2 emissions, global levels
would continue to rise, because China, India, and other emerging economic powerhouses are using far more coal and
oil energy.
Indeed, EPA itself admitted in a June 3, 2010, Federal Register notice that regulating emissions from U.S. cars
and trucks would reduce average global temperatures by an undetectable 0.002 degrees by 2100. The agency also
admits that regulating factories, power plants, cement kilns, and large office and apartment buildings under its
onerous global warming rules and permitting requirements would “slow construction nationwide for years” and cause
“adverse impacts” on U.S. economic development.
In other words, EPA’s new rules might result in jobs and “cash for caulkers,” perhaps with much of the funding
channeled from taxpayers through the Latino groups that wrote the letter. But the rules would cost millions of factory,
construction, and other jobs – for little or no environmental benefit.
Official U.S. unemployment remains mired at 9.6 percent. That’s the 14th. consecutive month it’s been over 9.5% – the
worst streak since the Great Depression. EPA’s rules would only make this worse.
One of the groups signing the letter claims Latino voters are willing to pay more to protect the environment. Are
Hispanics really that eco-conscious? A 2009 Wilson Research Strategies poll found that 76% of black Americans are
unwilling to pay more than $50 more per year for electricity, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A September, 2010,
Ipsos Public Affairs poll found that half of all Americans are unwilling to pay even $60 more per year in total energy
costs.
If only reality were so kind. Studies by the Brookings Institution, Heritage Foundation, Congressional Budget Office,
and others found that the House-passed climate bill would add $1,500 to $3,000 to the average family’s annual energy
bill! It would raise electricity rates 90-130% and gasoline prices 60-140% after adjusting for inflation. EPA rules would
have similar impacts.
We should not be surprised. Over in Britain, where they have already imposed a host of “green energy” and “climate
protection” laws, energy prices are already soaring, 5.5 million households have been driven into “fuel poverty” –
and 25,000 more elderly people died during the Winter than during the Summer.
The fact is, when energy and regulatory compliance costs increase, building construction slows, businesses stop
hiring or lay people off, the cost of everything we do soars higher, the vaunted Hispanic entrepreneurial spirit is
stifled, and poor people’s hopes of achieving the American Dream are thwarted. This is not “environmental justice.”
This is perverse, unnecessary and unacceptable.
Speaking of polls, a brand new Pew Hispanic Center survey found that Latinos are far less enthusiastic about heading
to the polls this November than in 2008. That makes the timing and thrust of this activist letter smell like an effort to
energize these reluctant voters and buttress White House and EPA agendas on energy, climate change, and a new
“green economy.”
Weatherproofing homes and improving energy efficiency are generally good things. But, if cash for caulkers is the
quid for the quo of activist groups promoting government agendas that drive up energy costs and kill jobs, we have a
serious problem. For, then, politicized groups and their leaders profit at the expense of those they claim to represent.
That is environmental injustice en Español. And it is wrong.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Science, Ethics, & Human Health:
Human Health & Public Policy
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Ethnic & Racial Politics in the U.S.A.
Reverend Sam Rodriguez is President of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference and Co-Chair of the
Affordable Power Alliance, a humanitarian coalition of civil rights, minority, small business, senior citizen, and
faith-based organizations that champion access to affordable energy: www.AffordablePowerAlliance.org
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XII, 2010
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity