THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XII, Issue # 245, November 11, 2010
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

2010 ELECTIONS: WHERE TO GO FROM HERE
By Christopher G. Adamo

THE 2010 U.S. CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS:  RESURGENCE OF TRADITIONAL AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATISM AS THE FORCE CURRENTLY DEFINING & DOMINATING THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE IN THE U.S.A. -- THE IMPORTANCE OF THE POLITICAL RIGHT PROPERLY INTERPRETRING & EXPLAINING THE REALITIES OF THE 2010 ELECTIONS & THEN CHARTING THE RIGHT & WISE COURSE TO THE PRESIDENTIAL & CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS OF 2012 -- THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOCUSING UPON CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, AS WELL AS ISSUES RELATING TO FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY -- THE NEED FOR REPUBLICANS TO INSIST THAT THE U.S. NATIONAL GOVERNMENT CONFINE ITS POLICIES & ACTIONS TO ITS SCOPE OF LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY, AS DEFINED & LIMITED BY THE AMERICAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
FULL STORY:   The sheer enormity of the 2010 mid-term elections has caused disfavored political players to scramble and posture. Some who, only a few years ago, had believed their agenda to be the wave of the future now find themselves relegated to the political fringe, while a resurgence of traditional Americanism is proving to be the force that defines and dominates the political landscape.

Of course, those who suffered voter rejection last week are not going to simply accept their defeat and go home. Politicians in general are hardly prone to such a course. But, for the Leftists whom the voters soundly rebuffed in this year’s elections, doing so is simply not an option. Every effort, no matter how transparent, to spin, distort, or otherwise rewrite this year’s events will be the necessary price of retaining power, or at least claiming to do so.

Fortunately for them, the election results exhibit sufficient ambiguity to be exploited, albeit with significant effort, as “proof” of the virtues and worthiness of the Liberal/Socialist agenda. So, America must be ready to see Marxism repackaged slightly, and then heaved upon them once again, unless the realities of the 2010 elections can be properly interpreted and explained, and the right course charted to 2012.

Without question, the most striking event was the Republican landslide in the U.S. House of Representatives. With a net gain of sixty-three seats, Republicans have received an undeniable mandate from the American people. But exactly what is the nature of that mandate? While a “safe” and shortsighted version might focus strictly on fiscal responsibility, this is only a single piece of the answer.

Indeed, the “Tea Party” movement of 2009 and 2010 was fueled, in large part, by citizen outrage over the abominable spending excesses of the U.S. central government. Just as vehemently however, this grassroots uprising was in reaction to the wholly unconstitutional realms into which the central government had inserted itself. From “healthcare” to environmental alarmism to the takeover of private industries, to the imposition of morally bankrupt edicts through judicial activism, the Obama administration and its like-minded statists in the Congress and the U.S. Courts have grossly abused the limited and defined powers entrusted to them by the consent of the people.

Clearly, the stark power shift in the Congress reflected an initial effort by the American people to re-establish proper limitations on governmental authority, and to repeal, defund, or otherwise countermand every extra-constitutional attempt to grow it beyond those limits. As the nation’s primary representative body, it is understandable the Congress would be the epicenter of this movement, and the stunning turnover of seats from Liberal Democrats to “Tea Party” Republicans bears witness to the fervency of these sentiments.

Unfortunately, U.S. Senate races were perceived and conducted differently, and the significantly less striking results in that body bear sad but sobering witness to the problems that must be confronted there. Unlike the House, the Senate largely succeeded in retaining its air of superiority as an elitist “fraternity.” Concerted grassroots efforts to shake-up the Senate were successfully thwarted, particularly by establishment Republicans whose main goal was not the restoration of the country, but the preservation of their exclusive society. Senate candidates whose election promised the infiltration of common sensical thinking into its hallowed halls were systematically undercut by Republican treachery. Though they might be suitable as Representatives in the Congress, they were typecast as substandard for the Senate. Unfortunately, the public proved susceptible to this tactic.

While Nevada Republican candidate Sharron Angle may well have fallen victim to rampant vote-fraud and fetid Democratic Party machine politics, she was also betrayed by prominent Nevada “Republicans” who publicly endorsed Harry Reid. “Party Unity” and other platitudes only apply when Republican “moderates” (read: Liberals) are attempting to co-opt Conservatives into supporting them.

Not surprisingly, ever since the results of the U.S. election in Deleware were reported, the GOP “insiders” have been crowing incessantly over the decisive loss of Delaware Republican candidate Christine O’Donnell to Leftist Democrat Chris Coons. The polls had hardly closed before former Bush strategist Karl Rove was putting forth his self-adulatory “I told you so” statements regarding his assessment of O’Donnell as “unelectable.” Ditto for fellow insider Charles Krauthammer, who, like Rove, never missed an opportunity to deride and undermine O’Donnell’s candidacy. So their “credibility” remains intact, even if the country suffers from the result.

In truth however, neither O’Donnell nor her supporters need bear any shame over her effort. Despite the fact that all of the “experts” were convinced that, had her Liberal Republican opponent, Mike Castle, won in the primary, he would have easily sailed through to a general election victory, the story hardly ends there. Outside of the Beltway, the situation bears a more cogent analysis. Would Conservative prospects in the U.S. Senate have really fared better with forty-seven Republicans, one of whom being the RINO Mike Castle? Or are they actually stronger with the current forty-six who know that they are expected to remain loyal to Conservative principles or face a primary opponent like O’Donnell in their next election?

Without being naively optimistic, a certain distinct benefit does redound from the less than ideal Tuesday election results. In 1994, a conglomeration of conditions, including the Christian Coalition, the ascendancy of Rush Limbaugh, and public backlash against Hillarycare combined to bring about the Republican landslide in both houses. Unfortunately, those who ultimately achieved that year’s resounding success subsequently laid it at the feet of the Republican Party, which then proceeded to dissemble and squander it.

In stark contrast, the tidal wave of the 2010-midterm elections resulted overwhelmingly from the heartfelt sentiments of the “Tea Party” movement. These grassroots patriots are not about to repeat the mistakes of the past, and are acutely aware that much work needs to be done to keep this Herculean effort moving forward. Any benefits enjoyed by the GOP establishment are given on a conditional and possibly temporary basis. Platitudes and rhetoric, in lieu of actual results, are not acceptable. 2012 can be another resounding victory for the constitutionalists of the Tea Party and the GOP, but only if the latter mends its ways, finds its spine, and returns decidedly to its Conservative roots.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
American Politics, Political Competition, & the Control of
Public Policy: Elections, Political Parties, Political Factions,
Ideologies, Special Interest Groups, & Political Corruption

American Government & the U.S. Congress:
Congressional Legislative Politics & National Public Policy

The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.

The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media

Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics

-------------------------

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY & POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES:
COMPETING SYSTEMS OF POLITICAL THOUGHT
Conservatism

Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers

Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status

Constitutional Conservatism: American & British

Liberalism

Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations

Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism

Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism

Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"

Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies

Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism



Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state levels for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XII, 2010


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity