NEW CONGRESS CAN DEFINE ISSUES FOR 2012
By Christopher G. Adamo
Admittedly, the options of the incoming, 112th. Congress are limited, since both the U.S. Senate and the White House remain in the clutches of the political Left, at least for the next two years. However, some promising signs indicate that soon-to-be U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (Republican - Ohio) and his decisive Repubican Party majority in the U.S. House of Representatives are acutely aware of the forces that propelled the political fortunes of Republicans in the November 2, 2010, congressional elections. And, if House Republicans continue in their present course, they may well set the stage for another rout of the remaining Leftists in the 2012 presidential and congressional elections. Real America would do well to actively support them or, if necessary, occasionally remind them to stay fixed on the principles that rallied the nation’s heartland in 2009 and 2010.
For starters, Speaker Boehner intends to implement a policy that will require any new proposed legislation to reference the portion of the United States Constitution which authorizes it as a legitimate governmental function. Without such an explanation, it will not be considered for further advancement through the national legislative process.
It may be much more difficult than Boehner currently expects to implement a policy of this nature and magnitude. Once enacted, its implications reach far beyond the U.S. House of Representatives. Undoubtedly, the Democratic Party-controlled U.S. Senate would despise and disdain any such limitation on their regular abuses of power. Seeing one of their own duly passed bills declared “dead on arrival” in the House of Representatives -- "dead" for lack of constitutional standing -- would both outrage and humiliate them. But how could they openly admit as much, if evaluating proposed legislation by such an unassailable standard were indeed official U.S. House policy? Their only recourse would then be to attempt to make the case that it should pass, regardless of its unconstitutional nature.
In a similar vein, the new Congress intends to have the U.S. Constitution read in its entirety at the opening of the session. While this move may be largely symbolic, it represents a clear admission by the Republican majority that much (if not all) of the current catastrophe of creeping socialism, and the economic disaster that has predictably accompanied it, are symptomatic of a government that has willfully ignored the restraints wisely placed on it by the Founders of the American Federal Republic.
More significantly, however, after having made such a gesture, Speaker Boehner would face enormous repercussions, were he to then backtrack on those constitutional principles he committed to, after having them proclaimed from the well of the House. In essence, he is knowingly cutting off any avenues of “escape,” for himself and his Republican coalition, if they are ever again tempted to revert to Washington “business as usual.”
By the inherent worthiness of Boehner’s action, Republicans in the Senate are offered an effective weapon, and an opportunity by which to overcome their lingering minority status, if they have a mind to do so. As laws are proposed and judges and Cabinet members nominated for Senate consideration during the remaining two years of President Barack Obama’s current term, Republican Senators will be enabled to remind their counterparts among Senate Democrats of the immutable standard which they have taken an oath to uphold and defend.
Thereafter, no judicial nominee should receive a single Republican vote of confirmation, if he or she does not have a provable track record of venerating and supporting American constitutional law and American constitutional government. And none of Obama’s “hope and change” should enjoy Senate support without likewise remaining within the constitutional framework on which the nation was established.
This policy would, of course, deal an immediate death blow to Obamacare, along with “Cap and Trade” and a host of other illicit actions by the current administration that were sanctioned by the former Congress, often with too much “Republican” participation. So now, let them attempt to continue brazenly advocating a continuation of these excesses, despite their being constitutionally unsupportable.
No doubt, a few hardcore Leftists may still do so (Nancy Pelosi’s unreserved contempt for the whole concept was a major deciding factor for many Americans who voted her party out in last Fall’s congressional elections). Others, who are not so ideologically obsessed, will recognize how far out of the mainstream they appear, and, as with the Bush tax cuts that were recently extended by a Democratic Party-dominated Congress, under pressure from a Democratic White House, they will be forced to shift to the Right.
Of course, this whole exercise may quickly degenerate, if the House GOP leadership is not diligent to maintain it, or if its current champions were never serious about doing so in the first place. Look for a likely cadre of “RINO” Republicans to join Democrats in justifying more outlandish behavior, by offering tepid and oblique “constitutional” references to “promoting the general welfare,” the Interstate Commerce Clause, and other select passages of the document that have been excessively and perversely employed to justify government actions that were never initially intended or authorized. Such antics, if they do occur, need to be immediately and stridently called out and stopped.
Republicans will either get serious about preserving and protecting their nation from the Liberal onslaught that threatens it, or they will cower and hide from such difficult issues in the face of media ridicule, only offering transparent attempts at pandering to the Conservative base during the waning days of the 2012 election cycle. But the time for empty promises has passed. America will no longer accept last minute platitudes, if the GOP does not come through in the next twenty-four months.
Meanwhile, three cheers for Speaker-to-be John Boehner, the new Republican House majority, and their determination to put the United States Constitution back where it belongs at front and center. If they stay true, Obama and the Democrats will spend this session completely on the defensive. It is a good start.
American Government & the U.S. Congress:
Congressional Legislative Politics & National Public Policy
American Government & the U.S. Presidency:
Presidential Politics & National Leadership
U.S. Constitutional Law & Political Philosophy
The Constitution of the United States of America
The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
-------------------------
Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers
Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status
Constitutional Conservatism: American & British
Liberalism
Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations
Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism
Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism
Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"
Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies
Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state
level for many years, and is a contributing columnist at the new print publication Liberty Ink Journal. His
contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 *
American Government 3 *
American Government 4
American Government 5 *
American Politics *
Anglosphere *
Arabs
Arms Control & WMD *
Aztlan Separatists *
Big Government
Black Africa *
Bureaucracy *
Canada *
China *
Civil Liberties *
Communism
Congress, U.S. *
Conservative Groups *
Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law *
Counterterrorism *
Criminal Justice *
Disloyalty *
Economy
Education *
Elections, U.S. *
Eminent Domain *
Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World *
Ethnicity & Race *
Europe *
Europe: Jews
Family Values *
Far East *
Fiscal Policy, U.S. *
Foreign Aid, U.S. *
Foreign Policy, U.S.
France *
Germany *
Hispanic Separatism *
Hispanic Treason *
Human Health *
Immigration *
Infrastructure, U.S. *
Intelligence, U.S. *
Iran *
Iraq *
Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat *
Islamism *
Israeli vs. Arabs *
Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism *
Jihad Manifesto I *
Jihad Manifesto II *
Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments *
Judiciary, American *
Latin America *
Latino Separatism
Latino Treason *
Lebanon *
Leftists/Liberals *
Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. *
Marriage & Family *
Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs *
Middle East: Iran *
Middle East: Iraq *
Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon *
Middle East: Syria *
Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey *
Militant Islam *
Military Defense *
Military Justice
Military Weaponry *
Modern Welfare State *
Morality & Decency
National Identity *
National Security *
Natural Resources *
News Media Bias
North Africa *
Patriot Act, USA *
Patriotism *
Political Culture *
Political Ideologies
Political Parties *
Political Philosophy *
Politics, American *
Presidency, U.S.
Private Property *
Property Rights *
Public Assistance *
Radical Islam
Religion & America *
Rogue States & WMD *
Russia *
Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason *
Senate, U.S. *
Social Welfare Policy *
South Africa
State Government, U.S. *
Subsaharan Africa *
Subversion *
Syria *
Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 *
Treason & Sedition *
Tunisia *
Turkey *
Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity *
UN & Its Agencies *
USA Patriot Act *
U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure *
U.S. Intelligence *
U.S. Senate *
War & Peace
Welfare Policy *
WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor