THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIII, Issue # 89, April 7, 2011
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

FISCAL ARMAGEDDON LOOMS, WHILE DEMOCRATS PLAY GAMES
By Christopher G. Adamo

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY & AMERICA'S NATIONAL BUDGETARY CRISIS:  DEMOCRATS NOT SERIOUS ABOUT DEALING WITH THE COUNTRY'S FISCAL CRISIS -- DEMOCRATS SEEKING TO EXPLOIT THE CRISIS FOR WHATEVER POLITICAL GAIN THEY MAY GLEAN FROM IT -- DEMOCRATS EXHIBITING COMPLETE CONTEMPT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE & THE FUTURE OF THE U.S.A. -- CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS, LOCKED IN THEIR DEVOTION TO THE GLORIOUS PAST TIMES OF RAMPANT GOVERNMENT EXPANSION & SPENDING, ONCE AGAIN SEEKING TO PORTRAY THEMSELVES AS THE GENEROUS BENEFACTORS OF SOCIETY -- THE ROLE BEING PLAYED BY PRESIDENT OBAMA IN THIS GAME -- WHAT REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS SHOULD DO TO SALVAGE FROM THIS MESS SOMETHING THAT WILL BENEFIT THE COUNTRY
FULL STORY:   By their own words, Washington, D.C., Democrats are daily proving that they are not serious about dealing with the nation’s budgetary crisis. Therefore, it must be concluded that they never have been. Rather, they remain doggedly in the mode of seeking to exploit the present situation for whatever political gain they may glean from it. In so doing, they exhibit complete contempt for the American people and the country’s future. Apparently, among Liberals, apart from any impact on their political standing going into the 2012 elections, nothing else matters.

Occasionally, they voice their supposed concern over fiscal matters, such as their much touted “cuts” of one hundred million dollars from the U.S. federal budget during the early days of the Obama administration. Yet, in comparison to the nearly unfathomable squandering of the national treasury that they have perpetrated in the past few years, that amount, enormous as it is, hardly registers on the federal ledger. Nobody who is sincere about reining in federal spending would dally among such trivial percentages for any reason, other than to deflect attention from the trillions that are concurrently being wasted.

Indeed, America’s irresponsible level of spending now approaches an impasse. The abominable situation will either be honestly addressed, or the national economy will implode. But, rather than working sincerely and diligently across party lines (It was not long ago that we were told of the glorious virtues of “bipartisanship”) in order to make wise budgetary decisions that would continue to fund worthwhile duties of government, while preventing an economic meltdown, Democrats caterwaul of a likely government “shutdown,” seeking to vilify congressional Republicans, as if any honest government officeholder has the option to continue profligate spending at the current rate.

Inarguably, some worthwhile federal programs will need to be cut if the budget is truly to be salvaged. However, that would be a far preferable alternative to allowing the present behemoth to continue spiraling out of control, at which point all programs, both good and bad, necessary and unnecessary, will cease to function. No less significant is the appalling fact that much of the current federal budget is bloated beyond reason, for the sole purpose of amassing power at the federal level, and thus could be eliminated with no real harm coming to the citizenry.

The Republican Congress, having been brought to majority status -- in the U.S. House of Representatives -- as a result of last November’s elections, is making some headway towards truly addressing the problem. But this undertaking reveals significant negative, as well as positive, points. On the downside, House Speaker John Boehner refuses to invoke necessary measures to prevent a staggering one-hundred billion dollars from being committed towards the implementation of Obamacare. Boehner’s reasoning is that doing so would entail a significant deviation from House rules, which he is unwilling to make.

In a time when Republicans have been empowered specifically to confront and correct the abhorrent abuses of power perpetrated by their Democratic Party rivals, it is dismaying that they refuse to take up the challenge. Democrats desecrated every vestige of constitutional law and principle, not to mention public trust, in order to implement Obamacare. Sadly, Boehner and his colleagues are now willing to sacrifice the integrity of the U.S. Constitution in order to restore and preserve the sanctity of House rules.

On the positive side, Representative Paul Ryan (Republican - Wisconsin) has unveiled a bold plan that could actually put the brakes on the current budgetary dysfunction. Ryan plans to trim spending over the next ten years, while ensuring that the nation returns to solvency. Admittedly, for his regimen to work, it would have to be studiously followed. And Washington has been notoriously bad at sticking to promises of any sensible limitation on its actions.

So, at this most critical milestone in the nation’s history, what are the terms of the debate that ought to bring about a restoration of sanity in the way government functions? According to Chris Van Hollen (Democrat - Maryland), “The Tea Party has hijacked the Republican Caucus.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called the effort “A path to poverty for America’s seniors and children.” Incoming Chair of the Democratic National Committee Debbie Wasserman Schultz (a virtual Pelosi clone, minus the charm and sex appeal) has accused Ryan of creating “a death trap for seniors.”

Locked in their devotion to the glorious past times of rampant government expansion, with never a thought of any day of reckoning, Liberal Leftist Democrats, once again, seek to portray themselves as the generous benefactors of society. Conversely, those on the political Right reflect a cold and miserly attitude, refusing to share even a tiny bit of the limitless supply of money that would otherwise flow so freely from Washington out to the “little people” across the land.

Of course, President Barack Obama had to get in on this game, demanding that the Republican dominated House and Democratic controlled Senate come to some sort of agreement (but one that he, as the ostensibly “neutral” overseer, could accept). And, in true leadership fashion, he claimed to have found common ground with Republican House Speaker Boehner on $73 billion in budgetary “cuts.”

Interestingly, Boehner bluntly refuted that claim, asserting that, as of their latest meeting, Obama could only agree to less than half that amount. Yet, consider either number against the vast backdrop of the $1.5 trillion deficit, for this year alone, that will ensue from current federal spending excesses. In more comprehendible terms, Obama’s courageous budgetary reduction is the equivalent of trimming forty-eight dollars (or nineteen dollars and change, if you believe Boehner’s number) off of a thousand dollar bender. In plain terms, neither the White House nor its co-conspirators on Capitol Hill have any intention of engaging in responsible governing.

In stark contrast to the manner in which this dilemma is being portrayed on the nightly news, the situation at present does not constitute a liability to the Republicans, if they can remain committed to the principles they espoused in their “Pledge to America.” What the nation is currently seeing is the chasm dividing the two political camps. On the one hand, the Republicans recognize the impending danger and, for the sake of the nation as a whole, are endeavoring to deal with it. Conversely, the Democrats display their intentions to shamelessly sidestep any real effort at avoiding catastrophe, while reverting to their standard tactics of instilling fear and panic among the citizenry, which is their primary method of preserving their current hold on power. And ultimately, that is their real goal.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Fiscal Policy: Taxation & Government Spending

American Government & the U.S. Congress:
Congressional Legislative Politics & National Public Policy

The American Political System:
Politics & Government in the U.S.A.

The American Political & Cultural Left:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, Marxists, & Other Leftists:
The Democratic Party, Academia, & the Mainstream Media

Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity

Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics

-------------------------

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY & POLITICAL IDEOLOGIES:
COMPETING SYSTEMS OF POLITICAL THOUGHT
Conservatism

Traditional Conservatism: Questions & Answers

Conservatism: Attitudes, Types, & Present Status

Constitutional Conservatism: American & British

Liberalism

Classical Liberalism: Intellectual Foundations

Classical Liberalism: Conservative Liberalism

Manchester Liberalism & Social Darwinism

Modern Social "Liberalism": Statist "Liberalism"

Radical & Totalitarian Ideologies

Radicalism, Utopianism, & Totalitarianism



Christopher G. Adamo is a resident of southeastern Wyoming. He has been involved in politics at the local and state level for many years. His contact information and article archives can be found at www.chrisadamo.com




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIII, 2011


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity