THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIII, Issue # 116, May 8, 2011
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
RADICAL ISLAM AT UC BERKELY LAW
By Stephen Suleyman Schwartz
DISLOYALTY & SUBVERSION ON AMERICA'S UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES: THE CONTINUING USE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA'S BAY AREA LAW SCHOOLS AS PLATFORMS FOR ARAB & ISLAMIST PROPAGANDA -- DEMAGOGY,
PANIC-MONGERING, & PROMOTING IRRATIONAL FEARS OF "ISLAMOPHOBIA" -- SEEKING TO GAIN STANDING FOR ISLAMIC
EXTREMISTS AS PROTECTORS OF A MUSLIM MINORITY IN THE U.S.A., ALLEGEDLY SUBJECT TO BIAS, DISCRIMINATION, &
PERSECUTION ON THE PART OF THE NON-MUSLIM MAJORITY OF AMERICANS -- MAKING THE DISCUSSION OF ISLAM A
MATTER OF RADICAL & REVOLUTIONARY POLITICAL IDEOLOGY, RATHER THAN A MATTER OR RELIGION OR PRINCIPLES OF
FAITH
FULL STORY:
The exploitation of the University of California's Bay Area law schools as a platform for Arab and Islamist propaganda
continues. A convocation on "Litigating Palestine," replete with extreme rhetoric against Israel, was held at Hastings Law
School in San Francisco on March 25-26, 2011 -- without official endorsement by Hastings -- and on April 20-21, an
equally radical conference took place at UC Berkeley Law School. It was held in Boalt Hall and presented to the wider
public via streaming video.
The Berkeley event was hosted by the University's Center for Race and Gender (CRG) and titled, in the style of
post-modern academia, "Islamophobia Production and Re-Defining Global 'Security' Agenda for the 21st Century."
Within CRG, the function appeared under the rubric of the Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project, directed
by Hatem Bazian, a senior lecturer in the Department of Near Eastern Studies. Conference publicity stated that the
speeches "will be published in UC Berkeley's Islamophobia Studies Journal, inaugural edition, Fall, 2011."
CRG assembled some notable cosponsors for its presentation on "Islamophobia." These included the Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which advocates for radical ideology under color of defending Muslim civil liberties
and as the flagship organization of the "Wahhabi lobby" in America, and the Islamic Educational Scientific and Cultural
Organization (ISESCO). Although based in Rabat, Morocco, ISESCO is a branch of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC), a body headquartered in Saudi Arabia and established in 1969, with the supposed aim of protecting
Islamic monuments in Jerusalem from Israel. The OIC has 57 member countries.
Other cosponsors of the CRG colloquium included Zaytuna College, the over-hyped "Islamic university" projected for
establishment in Berkeley by prominent American Muslim preacher and radical apologist Hamza Yusuf Hanson, his
close associate Zaid Shakir, and Bazian; American Muslims for Palestine, of which Bazian is also Chair; the UC Graduate
Theological Union (GTU) Center for Islamic Studies; the Boalt Law School Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic
Law; and the San Francisco State University Arab and Muslims Ethnicities and Diaspora Initiative. More UC
backing, according to the conference program, came from the University's Institute of International Studies and its
American Cultures Engaged Scholarship program.
The heaviest hitters on the speakers' list, with regard to their widespread public activities, were CAIR Executive Director
Nihad Awad, Hamza Yusuf, and Hatem Bazian. The three appeared on an April 21, 2011, evening panel, which dealt with
"Community Partnership" and was moderated by Munir Jiwa, Director of the GTU Center for Islamic Studies.
Hamza Yusuf was introduced with the fawning praise customarily granted him by his admirers, including mention of his
"teacher" Abdullah Bin Bayyah, a member of the fundamentalist European Council for Fatwas and Research (ECFR),
headed by the most famous radical Islamist preacher in the world, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.
Hanson demonstrated in Berkeley that his fondness for hyperbolic idioms has changed little since the period before the
atrocities of September 11, 2001. In 1995, he described Judaism as "a most racist religion." On September 9, 2001, two
days before 9/11, Hanson declared in Los Angeles:
"This country [America] unfortunately has a great,
a great tribulation coming to it. And much of it is
already here, yet people are too illiterate to read
the writing on the wall."
In the aftermath of 9/11, Hamza Yusuf sought to remake himself as a Muslim moderate and spiritual Sufi, and, even
before launching his "Zaytuna College" enterprise, he gained attention from prominent Western media, including the
New York Times, as a supposed representative of an alternative to radicalism in Islam.
Hanson began his Berkeley discourse, accompanied by a slide show, by alleging that a "war on Islam in the U.S." has
begun that is "well-funded" and omnipresent in media. His evidence for this exaggerated statement commenced with
the projection of newspaper editorial cartoons critical of radical Muslims, which he equated with comic strips. Many
Americans only read "the funny papers," he added, contemptuously.
Hanson was similarly caustic in dismissing concerns about airport safety, charging that "everybody" is engaged in
suspicious activity in airports, such as talking on cellular telephones. He further displayed his sarcasm by remarking
that, "all of us have a weapon of mass destruction" if we own an automobile. According to Hanson, Americans should
be comfortable with the fact that more people die in traffic accidents and ordinary criminal assaults than in Islamist
terrorist attacks.
Hanson's view of historical and geopolitical relations between Muslims and non-Muslims was equally snide and
simplistic. He asserted that Europe has "two identities," "Christian" and "not Muslim," ignoring the longterm presence
of some 30 million European Muslims in Russia, the Balkans, and other parts of Eastern Europe. With his penchant for
gratuitous twists of illogic, he complained that he is a "public figure" and therefore cannot sue his critics, who have
supposedly libeled him. Meanwhile, he insulted the Canadian writer Irshad Manji and other Muslim moderates, and
announced that critical websites on Islamic issues are financed by military technology corporations such as Raytheon
and General Electric.
He presented a familiar litany of chapters and incidents of racial and religious discrimination in American history, all of
them intended as parallels with the purported situation of American Muslims today. These included the dispossession
of indigenous Americans, enslavement of Africans and the attacks on African-Americans after the Civil War, prejudice
against Irish immigrants, exclusion of Chinese and other Asians from citizenship, relocation of ethnic Japanese in the
Western U.S.A. during World War II, and bias against Hispanics and Jews. Seeking to inject a note of inspiration into
his harangue, Hanson referred to American Indian resistance and the African-American civil rights struggle as "models
of possibility" for American Muslims. He failed, however, to enumerate incidents of massacres, involuntary servitude,
lynchings, or other such violations imposed on American Muslims. Hanson predicted horrors supposedly awaiting
American Muslims in the future, rather than accounting for existing problems.
Hanson could not control his anti-Jewish reflex; he claimed that religious Jews may be sympathetic to Muslims because
Judaism is also a religion with a "pre-modern" heritage, including child marriage, and thus, "people who live in glass
houses shouldn't throw stones."
Approaching the end of his speech, Hanson delivered yet another absurd complaint: that while American bookstores
are, as he put it, filled with titles celebrating Wicca (witchcraft) and Satanism as "self-help" cults, they include nothing
Islamic or pro-Muslim, compared with the volumes of anti-Muslim polemics he claimed had flooded the country.
Apparently, Hanson does not visit Western-style bookstores frequently enough to notice that books on mainstream
religions like Islam are shelved separately from "new age" and "self-help" books, and that titles sympathetic to Islam,
and even to its radical forms, now abound.
CAIR's Nihad Awad repeated Hanson's inappropriate catechism of comparisons, drawing the now-hackneyed, but no
less spurious, parallel between the contemporary situation of American Muslims and past ill-treatment of Asians. He
invoked the specter of thousands of adherents to Islam he said were now denied U.S. citizenship because of their faith,
without providing evidence for so expansive an accusation. Awad pilloried Hollywood for supposedly producing 900
films that stereotyped Muslims and, therefore, encouraging Americans to mistreat Muslims and ignore their complaints.
He also indicted television news, which he said "never" produces positive reportage on Muslims.
Bazian, whose record of radical incitement is no less extensive and exhibitionistic than those of Hamza Yusuf and Nihad
Awad, closed the panel by demanding that the Jewish Community Relations Councils, Anti-Defamation League, and
Simon Wiesenthal Center be "taken to task" for their work exposing radicalism in the American Muslim community. He
was equally aggressive in denouncing Muslim critics of radicalism, such as Irshad Manji, and declared, "I don't need to
reform my thinking." Bazian called for a political coalition to align Muslims with other minority groups in preparation for
the 2012 presidential election, in which he predicted that Muslims would be unfairly targeted by Conservative
candidates.
From the perspective of the radicals at Berkeley, Islamophobia is a political label that has little or nothing to do with
how Islam is discussed as a religion, and much more to do with gaining standing for extremist Muslims as protectors of
a minority allegedly subject to bias and discrimination. Islamophobia is, for them, a precious commodity whose
"production" justifies their demagogy and panic-mongering. They have turned a legitimate topic for discussion into a
target for irrational fears of persecution -- a phobia about Islamophobia. And they have succeeded, at least in Berkeley,
in making any discussion of Islam a matter of ideology, rather than of comparative religion or principles of faith, with
the apparent assent of Berkeley's theological departments.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Education, Training, & America's Schools:
U.S. Institutions of Elementary, Secondary, & Higher Education:
Schools, Colleges, & Universities As Instruments of Political Propaganda:
Propaganda Platforms in the Islamist Jihad Against America & the West
Lawfare -- The Use of Law as a Weapon in War & Politics:
Islamist Lawfare & the "Legal" Jihad Against America & the West
The Islamist Fifth Column -- America's Internal Enemies:
Disloyalty, Subversion, Sedition, & Treason
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East
American Foreign Policy -- Political & Psychological Warfare
International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security
U.S. National Security Strategy
Stephen Suleyman Schwartz, an American journalist, columnist and author, is Executive Director of the Center for
Islamic Pluralism, a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., and designed to promote "moderate Islam."
Schwartz, describing himself as a Jewish convert to the Hanafi school of Sunni Islam, is a vocal critic of the ideology
of Islamism and an equally vocal critic of the Wahhabi sect of Sunni Islam. Originally an adherent of the political Far
Left, he currently identifies as a Neoconservative.
Schwartz is a UC Berkeley alumnus and was a staff writer for the San Francisco Chronicle from 1989 to 1999.
The foregoing article by Stephen Schwartz was originally published in the American Thinker, May 8, 2011, and
can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum, a foreign policy think tank which seeks to
define and promote American interests in the Middle East, defining U.S. interests to include fighting radical Islam,
working for Palestinian Arab acceptance of the State of Israel, improving the management of U.S. efforts to promote
constitutional democracy in the Middle East, reducing America's energy dependence on the Middle East, more robustly
asserting U.S. interests vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia, and countering the Iranian threat.
(URL: http://www.meforum.org/2899/radical-islam-uc-berkeley-law)
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
May 8, 2011
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIII, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity