THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIII, Issue # 210, August 26, 2011
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
SPREADING "BIG OIL SUBSIDY" DISINFORMATION:
Meanwhile, Real Subsidies Are Driving Real
Businesses, Energy, & Jobs out of America
By Paul K. Driessen
WHAT WE NEED TO DO IN ORDER TO PROVIDE RELIABLE, AFFORDABLE, ECOLOGICAL & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, PUT PEOPLE
BACK TO WORK, REJUVENATE OUR ECONOMY, & GENERATE TRILLIONS IN NEW GOVERNMENT REVENUE: OPEN
AMERICA'S PUBLIC LANDS FOR RESPONSIBLE HYDROCARBON DEVELOPMENT -- TAKE THE BOOT OFF THE NECK OF
AMERICAN BUSINESSES -- GET RID OF ALL THE SUBSIDIES, BAILOUTS, TARGETED TAX BREAKS, SELECTIVE TARIFFS,
MANDATES TO PURCHASE ETHANOL & OTHER PRODUCTS, & OTHER CORPORATE WELFARE GIMMICKS THAT MAKE TAX
LAWYERS & LOBBYISTS MORE IMPORTANT THAN RESEARCHERS, TRAINED WORKERS, & TOP-FLIGHT CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
FULL STORY:
Every American manufacturing company gets tax deductions that help it create jobs and strengthen our economy,
whether it produces newspapers, furniture, cars, or fuel. Eliminating those deductions would increase unemployment
and further slow our nation’s desperately needed economic recovery.
Yet, that is precisely what President Barack Obama wants to do when oil companies want to use the deductions. It is
one of many ways the Obama administration is undermining the oil industry and 9.2 million Americans whose jobs it
supports. It is part of the administration’s strategy for replacing fossil fuels with heavily subsidized “alternatives” that
taxpayers cannot afford, and consumers will not purchase on their own.
Newspapers that benefit from the same genre of tax deductions as oil companies, nevertheless, sometimes join in
attacking the oil industry, and the jobs and benefits it creates. This is rank hypocrisy.
“If Republicans are truly determined to slash the budget and end government waste,” the New York Times
editorialized, “they will start [by] ending the web of tax breaks enjoyed by the rolling-in-dough oil industry and
terminating the ethanol subsidy. Together these cuts would save up to $100 billion over 10 years.”
The Times is right about ending ethanol subsidies. But it and other “progressives” are wrong on every other
argument they present to justify their job-killing, economy-crippling energy agenda.
(1) Oil industry tax deductions cover costs incurred in exploration, drilling, production, transportation, and refining.
They aren’t subsidies or special tax breaks. They are essentially the same deductions claimed by all manufacturers, in
conducting their business under our complex tax code. They ensure that businesses recover their costs and get taxed
only on net income, in the process of making essential products.
Refineries and petrochemical manufacturers play an especially vital role in the oil industry – transforming crude oil and
natural gas into fuels and raw materials used to make fabrics, plastics, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, fertilizers, carpets,
paints, roofing, siding, and myriad other products that improve and safeguard our lives. Solar panels and resins for
fiberglass wind turbine blades are also petroleum-based.
The New York Times, itself, enjoys similar tax breaks, and hasn’t offered to give one of them up, to help end
government waste. Nor have other newspapers, some of which have even sought to benefit under the “failing
newspaper act,” which would let them operate as “educational nonprofits,” and pay no taxes. Others have sought
exemptions from antitrust laws, so that they can set online subscription prices.
In truth, in this Internet and Online media age, we could live without newspapers. But, as an American Express
advertising executive might say, Oil: You can't leave home without it. Nor can you have modern civilization or improved
health and living standards without it.
(2) Most petroleum companies aren’t “Big Oil.” They’re small independents. And the entire industry operates under
government policies and regulations that keep many of America’s best oil and gas prospects off limits and make leasing,
exploration, and drilling needlessly expensive and time-consuming. Between 1981 and 2008, the largest consolidated oil
companies (“Big Oil”) alone paid $1.95 trillion in severance, property, excise, sales and corporate income taxes, the Tax
Foundation reports.
Eliminate the tax deductions amid the current regulatory and political climate, and fewer wells will be drilled, fewer
deposits will be profitable enough to develop, fields will be abandoned prematurely, royalty revenues will decline,
refineries will close or move overseas, workers will lose their jobs, their income tax payments will morph into welfare
checks, and we will import still more oil and refined products.
(3) A primary reason oil and gasoline prices are so high, unemployment is stuck at 9%, and our economic growth is
anemic is that government has made most of our Western states, Alaskan, and Outer Continental Shelf energy
prospects off limits. It raises unfounded concerns about hydraulic fracturing, and drags its feet on permits for lands that
supposedly are “available” for leasing and drilling. In short, it chokes off supplies.
Meanwhile, politicians stoke demand – with proposed congressional legislation like the NAT GAS Act of 2011. That bill
would obligate U.S. taxpayers to pony up some $14 billion annually in subsidies (aka, tax credits and rebates), to
encourage motorists to buy natural gas-fueled cars and trucks, and service stations to install natural gas fueling stations.
Eliminate oil company tax deductions: “save” $4 billion. Subsidize car and truck purchases: spend $14 billion. It’s
unsustainable. It’s insane.
(4) Real subsidies take money taken from society’s productive sectors, and transfer it to legislators and bureaucrats, who
give it to companies that “deserve” funding, because they provide politically favored products or could not remain in
business without perpetual infusions of Other People’s Money. You support our reelection, our “catastrophic man-made
global warming” thesis and our commitment to a renewable energy future, and you’ll continue receiving taxpayer cash –
until the OPM runs out.
Evergreen Solar received $486 million in federal and state subsidies, but still closed its doors and fired 850 workers, when
the subsidy well ran dry. The same thing happened to five of six solar companies in Germany. The jobs went to China and
Malaysia, which have lower costs and fewer regulations.
(5) Even with subsidies, wind and solar still can’t compete, unless they are also exempted from endangered species and
other environmental laws. If you shoot an eagle, or birds die in an uncovered oil company waste pit, fines and possibly
prison terms are meted out. But wind farms slaughter bald and golden eagles, falcons, hawks, curlews, bats and other
threatened, endangered, and just plain majestic sky dwellers with no consequences. They even get fast-tracked through
the environmental review process by the same Interior Department and EPA that routinely delay or deny oil and gas
applications.
(6) Then there’s ethanol. Producing 13.2 billion gallons of it in 2010 required one-quarter of all the corn grown in the
United States, monopolizing 23 million acres (Grade A cropland the size of Indiana) and consuming 1.2 trillion gallons of
water, along with prodigious amounts of petroleum in the form of fertilizer and tractor, truck, and distillery fuel -- for $6
billion a year in subsidies. While corn growers get rich, higher corn prices mean pork and chicken producers pay more for
feed, meat producers are driven out of business, manufacturers pay more for corn syrup, consumers pay more for food,
and jobs disappear.
America could produce far more gasoline from a mere 2,000 acres in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (1/20 of
Washington, D.C.), if anti-oil zealots would end their opposition to drilling in the frozen tundra.
And still ethanol enjoys fuel pump mandates, $6 billion in annual subsidies, and tariffs against foreign competition – so
that consumers can “choose” a fuel that gets a third fewer miles per gallon than gasoline.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Defense Department is doing a theirs-not-to-reason-why Light Brigade charge into the jaws of
biofuel R&D, and extolling the virtues of camellia-based jet fuel that costs $67 a gallon, versus $5 per gallon for aviation
gas that could also come from ANWR, the OCS, and other off-limits U.S. lands.
The bottom line is simple. The worst thing we can do is what President Obama is intent on doing: use the mythical
revenues he expects from eliminating oil company “subsidies and tax breaks” to increase federal wind, solar, and ethanol
subsidies by another 50% (to $18 billion a year) – so as to “foster the clean energy economy of the future and reduce our
reliance on fossil fuels that contribute to climate change.”
As should be abundantly clear by now, these energy sources are not so clean or eco-friendly. They can’t exist without
perpetual subsidies. They are simply not sustainable.
To provide reliable, affordable, ecological and sustainable energy, put people back to work, rejuvenate our economy and
generate trillions in new government revenue, we need to do three things:
(1) Open America’s public lands for responsible hydrocarbon development;
(2) Take the boot off the neck of American businesses;
(3) Get rid of all the subsidies, bailouts, targeted tax breaks, selective tariffs, mandates to purchase ethanol and
other products, and other corporate welfare gimmicks that make tax lawyers and lobbyists more important than
researchers, trained workers, and top-flight CEOs.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality, the Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow, and the
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen is author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death (2004).
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIII, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity