THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIV, Issue # 35, February 27, 2012
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
RICHARD FALK'S IMAGINATION TRUMPS TRUTH IN LECTURE ON ISRAEL:
FALK'S IMAGINATION GONE WILD
By April Kaza
ANTI-ISRAELI PROPAGANDA DISSEMINATED BY PROFESSOR RICHARD FALK: FALK'S SOLUTION FOR HOW TO ACHIEVE "PEACE" IN THE MIDDLE EAST:
MOVE FROM THE DOMAIN OF REASON & ANALYSIS TO THE DOMAIN OF IMAGINATION. CONCEIVE OF A REGION-WIDE SOLUTION, COUPLED WITH THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A NUCLEAR FREE ZONE FOR THE MIDDLE EAST, WHICH IRAN WOULD FULLY SUPPORT. DESPITE THE PALESTINIANS' EXTRAORDINARY
CONCESSIONS, ACCORDING TO FALK, WHAT ISRAEL IS WILLING TO OFFER IS MUCH LESS THAN WHAT THE ISRAELIS COULD AFFORD TO ACCEPT, & THE CYCLE
OF TENSION KEEPS THE REGION IN PRE-WAR CONDITIONS THAT ROB ATTENTION FROM THE ORDEAL OF SUFFERING IMPOSED ON PALESTINIANS.
FULL STORY:
Richard Falk, Princeton University Professor Emeritus of International Law and United Nations Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian
Territories, is well-known for his hostility towards Israel. Indeed, this antagonism, and his high-profile involvement in any number of anti-Israel organizations, led
to his expulsion from the country in 2008.
A recent lecture at Stanford Law School entitled, "Imagining Israeli-Palestinian Peace: Why International Law Matters," provided a platform for more of the same
vitriol. Approximately 100 people attended, about evenly split between students and local residents. One of the latter, when asking a question, described himself
as an "activist" and an elderly couple sporting keffiyehs and political buttons sat in the front row, nodding enthusiastically in agreement throughout the lecture.
Falk's solution for how to achieve "peace" in the Middle East was to "move from the domain of reason and analysis to the domain of imagination," which,
throughout his lecture, trumped facts, analysis, and history.
For instance, he suggested that policy makers "conceive of a region-wide solution, coupled with the establishment of a nuclear free zone for the Middle East,"
which, against all evidence, he claimed Iran would fully support. In Falk's view, Israel's alleged nuclear capabilities threaten stability in the Middle East, whereas
Iran's push for nuclear armament, constant threats to annihilate Israel, and attempts to destabilize the region count for nothing.
Of the relationship between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas and its effect on the "peace process," Falk asserted that "Israel could not hope for softer
Palestinian leadership" and disparaged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for making "Palestinians . . . choose between making peace with Hamas and
making peace with [Israel]."
Imagination drifted to fantasy as he argued that, despite the Palestinians' "extraordinary concessions . . . what Israel is willing to offer is much less than what
[they] could afford to accept," and that the "cycle of tension . . . keeps the region in pre-war conditions" that robs attention from the "ordeal of suffering
imposed on Palestinians."
Falk was encouraged, however, by what he called a "strong shift in tactical emphasis from armed resistance to popular resistance" and chalked up this alleged
"shift to non-violent militancy" as the reason for increased global support for the Palestinian cause. He claimed that the public is beginning to see the conflict as
"unfinished business from the colonial era" in which the Palestinians are victims who can no longer be consigned to this "intolerable ordeal." And he lamented
Israel's "unlawful" settlement expansion in East Jerusalem, which he claimed amounted to "ethnic cleansing."
During the question and answer period following the lecture, Joel Beinin — Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History and Professor of Middle East History at
Stanford University — expressed his admiration for Falk's work. Beinin, best known for his anti-American and anti-Israel pontificating, was heartened by Falk's
portrayal of the U.S.A. as a declining world power relative to China and India and asked whether this, "among all the other positive diplomatic and geo-strategic
factors [Falk] mentioned, is also likely to change the balance of forces in favor of the Palestinian people?" Falk said he was "grateful for the construction of the
issue," but was less optimistic, given what he sees as America's ingrained, pro-Israel stance.
John Felstiner, an Emeritus Professor of English at Stanford, posed a more provocative question. Prefacing his comments by noting that he was neither
enamored of Netanyahu's policies nor of Israel's settlements, he challenged Falk's presentation of the issues: "I fear we were hearing perhaps half the truth
historically . . . why was so much omitted?"
In response, Falk reiterated his focus on the imagined over the actual:
"I provided an interpretation based on my understanding of how
to see the essential issues. . . . Of course, I left out some of the
complexities that do exist, but I would stand behind my view that
the essential character of the conflict represents the systematic
and progressive denial of Palestinian rights, the expansion of
Israel, [and] the unconditional way in which the U.S.A. has
handled the conflict. . . . I can understand that people can have
a different reading of the issues."
A few other audiences members challenged Falk's assertions, including a woman who, in the course of a lengthy exchange, asked:
"Why would the UNWRA [the United Nations Relief and Works
Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East] call a Palestinian
refugee someone who was in that area from 1946-1948 if they were
indigenous? I don't think the majority were indigenous; I think
they were immigrants also.
This was met with mocking laughter from several students and positive references from Falk to "the Nakba" — the Arabic term meaning "catastrophe" used by
Israel's opponents to describe its founding in 1948 — and to the "right of return . . . on the part of [Palestinian] refugees."
An elderly gentleman in the audience who described himself as a Christian member of J-Street — a Left-leaning organization that claims to be "pro-Israel and
pro-peace," but is in fact notoriously anti-Israel — asserted that "there has been a shift in Christendom in America," suggesting, despite polls consistently
showing otherwise, that Israel may not be able to rely on the support of Christian Zionists much longer. While Falk was skeptical about the accuracy of this
claim, he fondly recalled that the founder of J-Street, Jeremy Ben-Ami, was his thesis advisee at Princeton. Falk's legacy of Israel-bashing seems secure.
Falk's lecture rehashed the familiar tropes used to demonize Israel: accusations of apartheid, colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and military and political aggression.
Unfortunately, his advocacy of "imagination" and "interpretation" over "facts" is all too common in the fields of International Law and Middle East Studies.
Yet his pessimism about the prospects for what he called "real change" in the Middle East, thanks to continued American support for Israel, offered an
unintentional ray of hope in an otherwise gloomy presentation.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Israel, Arabs, & the Islamic Middle East -- The Israeli-Arab Conflict;
Israeli Politics, Government, & Public Policy -- Public Issues & Controversies;
The State of Israel in War & Peace -- Israel's Role in International Relations;
Israeli Military Defense & National Security -- The Israeli Economy
The Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States, & Their Regional Neighbors
American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East
Islamism & Jihadism -- Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
April Kaza wrote the foregoing article for Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.
Republished with Permission of Campus Watch & the Middle East Forum.
Republished from Campus Watch, February 27, 2012.
URLs:
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/12117
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/02/27/richard-falks-imagination-runs-wild-at-stanford/
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIV, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity