THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIV, Issue # 38, February 28, 2012
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
EPA LOSING ITS WAY ON GLOBAL WARMING:
EPA's Carbon Dioxide Rules Endanger Human Health & Welfare
By Craig Rucker
EPA RULES, PSEUDO-SCIENCE, & JUDICIAL CHALLENGE: WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE ONGOING LITIGATION OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY'S CARBON DIOXIDE "ENDANGERMENT" RULES -- WHY THE EPA'S CO2 REGULATIONS & "CLIMATE CRISIS" CLAIMS DO NOT WITHSTAND HONEST,
RIGOROUS SCIENTIFIC EXAMINATION & SHOULD NOT SURVIVE COURTROOM SCRUTINY -- PETER GLEICK'S STOLEN & FABRICATED HEARTLAND INSTITUTE
DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE AT THE HEART OF THE FAKEGATE SCANDAL THAT FURTHER UNDERSCORES THE DESPERATION OF ANTI-HYDROCARBON
"MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING DISASTER" FACTIONS
FULL STORY:
Legal challenges by states and industry groups over the Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases could
and should be decided in the challengers’ favor. Whether that will happen in this highly politicized, semi-scientific matter of “dangerous manmade global warming
and climate change” remains to be seen. Regardless of what the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., decides, the case will almost assuredly return to the
U.S. Supreme Court, where the outcome is equally uncertain.
In Massachusetts v. EPA (2007), the U.S. Supreme Court said EPA had the authority (but not the obligation) to regulate CO2 under the Clean Air Act’s
“capacious definition of air pollutant.” EPA could do so, the court ruled, if its Administrator concluded that GHG emissions “may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare.” In other words, the Administrator’s opinion was not sufficient. The agency must conduct a scientific study and make a
convincing scientific case for taking action.
Not surprisingly, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson decided that CO2 does endanger public health and welfare, and signaled her intention to regulate these
emissions. However, there are serious problems with this.
First, EPA conducted no original research of its own. Relying on work by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and other agencies, it
merely selected existing studies and reports that supported its predetermined outcome – and ignored numerous studies that contradicted its decision.
Second, scientific opinion is sharply divided on the extent to which these gases might contribute to climate change. EPA chose to disregard this inconvenient truth
– and continue the shoddy practice begun by the IPCC and alarmist climate scientists of refusing to discuss or debate the validity of computer models, assertions
of imminent disaster, and evidence for and against the catastrophic AGW (anthropogenic global warming) hypothesis.
Third, carbon dioxide simply is not a “pollutant” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act. It is not an agent that fouls or contaminates the air, making it harmful to
human health. In fact, CO2 is a natural component of Earth’s atmosphere and a key ingredient in photosynthesis. Without carbon dioxide, all life on Earth would
cease to exist.
Fourth, both the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision and the IPCC studies relied on by EPA predate the Climategate emails and other scandals that have revealed
how contrived, questionable and perhaps even fraudulent global warming disaster “science” actually is. Had those documents surfaced prior to its 2007
deliberations, the Supreme Court’s decision might well have been very different.
Fifth, allowing EPA to impose its CO2/GHG regulatory regime would effectively put the agency in charge of every aspect of Americans’ energy use, economic
activities, and lives. EPA’s unprecedented and exorbitantly expensive rules will severely and adversely affect hydrocarbon use, energy prices, food production,
manufacturing, transportation, jobs, home and office heating and cooling, hospital and school operations – and thus human health and welfare.
Finally, and most absurd of all, even eliminating every source of carbon dioxide in the USA – electricity generation, vehicles, industries, humans, and animals –
would do nothing to reduce other emission sources worldwide. While US carbon dioxide emissions are declining, those sources continue to raise atmospheric CO2
concentrations. Thus, despite their devastating impacts on America’s economy and living standards, EPA’s rules would do virtually nothing to forestall the harms
that its pseudo-science predicts.
Into this legal, scientific, and regulatory cesspool now comes yet another element, which may yet go down as a key turning point in the debate – more important
even than Climategate: Peter Gleick’s February 14, 2012, transmission of several stolen documents and a forged memorandum to 15 environmental activists in the
United States and possibly abroad.
The stolen documents were taken from The Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based think tank that has received increasing attention for challenging IPCC and EPA
global warming doom and gloom dogma, misinformation, and propaganda. (Among the documents stolen were lists of HI donors and its entire 2012 budget.) The
political Left and its mainstream media lapdogs had a field day with the information, but focused almost exclusively on the forged memo, which purported to reveal
Heartland’s secret “climate strategy” – to make school children, citizens, and legislators better informed about actual climate science.
Six days later, Peter Gleick, President and Co-Founder of the Pacific Institute, confessed to the crime. Virtually everyone now agrees the memo is a poor forgery, probably
written by Gleick, although he still denies having done so.
Gleick is a prominent member of the global warming clique. His take-down is big news, and one reason this scandal could overshadow Climategate in its impact on
global warming debates. Despite all the Sturm und Drang caused by Climategate, no one really paid a price for the gross misbehavior revealed by the leaked emails
– even though the actions were funded with taxpayer money and used to promote bogus science, harmful public policies, and massive changes in energy use and
living standards.
Gleick has been forced to step down from several positions, including as President of the Pacific Institute, and will likely face civil and criminal charges. His is likely
to be only the first scalp that global warming “realists” collect from this incident. Heartland has indicated it will also go after Gleick’s accomplices in major
environmentalist organizations and even in the drive-by media.
The criminal and civil cases will drag out for years, and discovery could uncover even more misbehavior in the alarmist camp than did Climategate. Heartland may
also face discovery, but the stolen documents suggest that it has little or nothing to hide.
Why did Gleick target Heartland? As HI President Joseph Bast wrote to climate scientist Judith Curry in a message posted on her blog, Climate Etc: “I suspect he
targeted us because we have done so much to document and rebut the assumptions and exaggerations of the global warming alarmists.” He then mentioned
Heartland’s monthly publication, Environment & Climate News, its persuasive multi-volume response to the IPCC, Climate Change Reconsidered,
and its six international climate conferences. (See: http://judithcurry.com/2012/02/24/why-target- heartland)
Climategate caught the global warming establishment off-guard, but it soon regained its footing, aided immensely by the billions of dollars that governments are
pouring into the “climate crisis” industry. Fakegate is rocking their world again, revealing the alarmists’ increasing desperation that the debate they don’t want to
have will cost them their credibility, prestige, power, and funding. This time, Fakegate may sweep some of them off their feet.
Who knew what Gleick was up to, and when did they know it? Who was Gleick trying to impress by this theft and forgery, and what did he and his accomplices
seek to gain?
In the digital era, every email and every PDF document leaves a digital trail. There will be no cover up this time, no white-wash investigations by friendly IPCC and
university colleagues. The perpetrator can’t take the Fifth Amendment in a civil suit, and the prospect of time in jail has been known to loosen lips. The whole
global warming cabal is wondering when the next shoe will drop, and drop it shall.
The truth will finally come out, and the world will be better for it.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Science, Ethics, & Human Health:
Human Health & Public Policy
Craig Rucker is a Co-Founder of the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) and currently serves as its Executive Director.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIV, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity