THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIV, Issue # 138, June 27, 2012
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
FOUNDING NATIONAL MYTHS: FABRICATING PALESTINIAN HISTORY
By Dr. David Bukay
THE STRATEGY & TACTICS OF ASSERTING PALESTINIAN NATIONHOOD & STATEHOOD: PALESTINIAN DENIAL OF ANY HISTORIC JEWISH CONNECTION TO
CANAAN, OR THE LAND OF ISRAEL -- PALESTINIANS STEALING THE JEWISH ENEMY'S HERITAGE, HISTORY & VALUES, & DENYING THE JEWS' LEGITIMACY AS A
PEOPLE & A STATE -- A CENTRAL GOAL OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY: REWRITING THE HISTORY OF THE LAND OF ISRAEL BY ERASING JEWISH HISTORY &
REPLACING IT WITH A FABRICATED PALESTINIAN HISTORY
FULL STORY:
The vast literature proving the historic Jewish connection to the Land of Israel has been extensively manipulated and distorted as part of the Palestinian politics of
nationalism. Propaganda, indoctrination and socialization, both domestically and internationally, are essential parts of the strategy and tactics of asserting
Palestinian nationhood and statehood. By appropriating to themselves the values, traditions, and historical facts that belong to the Jews, Palestinians have
managed to fabricate a "legitimate" history and political traditions out of nothing, while denying those of Israel.
THE PALESTINIAN NATION-BUILDING STRATEGY
A Palestinian flag emblazoned with "Jesus." Not even Jesus's origin as a Jew is safe from the Palestinian fabrication of their history. While Jesus was certainly
viewed for centuries as a Muslim prophet (along with Abraham and Moses), only recently has he become a model Palestinian shahid, a martyr to their cause.
Nation-building often involves the invention of foundation myths, although these normally require a certain relationship to historic facts, however tenuous.
Palestinian leaders, under the leadership of Yasser Arafat and his successors, adopted a different tack: stealing the enemy's heritage, history and values, and
denying its legitimacy as a people and a state. The Palestinian objectives are to disqualify Israel's historical standing and to inherit its belongings by delegitimizing
and even dehumanizing its national identity and personality.
Palestinian tactics are simple yet sophisticated: preaching and dispersing lies and distortions of reality. History proves that the bigger the lie and the more common
its reiteration, the more it is accepted as authentic and genuine. Moreover, most people are unwilling to accept the idea that an entire national leadership would dare
to totally distort and fabricate history in full. Part of the Palestinians' success in doing so is also due to the fact that most people do not know the history of the
Land of Israel and of Jerusalem.
USURPING THE JEWISH, BIBLICAL, & CHRISTIAN PASTS
Rewriting the history of the Land of Israel by erasing Jewish history and replacing it with a fabricated Palestinian history is a central goal of the Palestinian Authority
(PA) and something that the early generations of Palestinian leaders, including the notorious Hajj Amin Husseini, who led the Palestinian Arabs to their 1948 defeat,
dared not do. This fictitious history, which ignores all historical documentation and established historical methods, is based on systematic distortions of both ancient
and modern history with the aim of denying Israel's right to exist.
The Palestinian leaders claim lineage from ancient history, describing the Canaanites as their direct ancestors. [1] In the words of the PA President Mahmoud Abbas:
"We said to him [Netanyahu], when he claimed the Jews have a historical
right dating back to 3000 years B.C.E., we say that the nation of Palestine
upon the land of Canaan had a 7,000-year history. This is the truth that
must be said: Netanyahu, you are incidental in history. We are the people
of history. We are the owners of history." [2]
According to Palestinian Authority historians, the Palestinian people has been living in Palestine for over seven thousand years. [3] Another claim states that
Palestinians were in the land since the beginning of creation. [4] According to Sheikh Ikrima Sabri, Chairman of the Supreme Islamic Council of the Palestinian
Authority, Palestinians have roots in this land originating from earlier than 7500 B.C.E. [5] Arab villages have allegedly existed since the days of the Canaanites. [6]
The "Arab" Canaanites supposedly established ports on the coast of Canaan, known today as Palestine, and Jaffa is said to have been one of the cities whose
Canaanite origins later invaders failed to erase.[7] Overall, the Palestinian people claim to be rooted in the region for thousands of years and long before Israel. [8]
According to this argument, some 6,000 years ago, the Palestinians of Canaan created a great civilization that, like the sun, was producing light and shining it on
human beings as the Islamic religious basis of the world. [9] Palestinian scholars and media have touted the claim that the Palestinian Arab nation has been rooted in
its land for thousands of years since the human settlement of the "Arab-Palestinian-Canaanite" city of Jericho — the oldest city in the history of human civilization.
In their claim, the history and heritage of Jericho confirm the Arab-Palestinian-Canaanite narrative concerning the entire Palestinian land, from the sea to the river, and
negate the false Zionist narrative. Jericho allegedly proves that the Palestinian nation is the most ancient and earliest of all, whose roots are the most deeply dug into
history. [10]
Palestinians also declared themselves to have been the center of historical events and peoples found in the Bible in the form of the Edomites, Amorites,
Midianites, Amalekites, Ibrahim bin Azar (biblical Abraham), and al-Khadir (Prophet Elijah). [11] In the view of the Palestinian Ambassador to India, Adli Sadeq, to
ignore the existence of the Palestinian people and its rights reflects a logic that mocks intelligence, culture and the Bible itself, in which Palestine and its people
are mentioned more than 250 times. [12] Of course, the term Palestine appears nowhere in the Bible. The assertion that the Palestinians are descended from the
biblical Jebusites, who, according to the Bible, were the original inhabitants of Jerusalem, has also been frequently made. [13]
To claim that Palestinians are the original inhabitants of the Land of Israel not only goes against secular history and scientific knowledge, but it also flies in the face of
Islamic religious history. Not only do the Islamic scriptures recognize the unique Jewish claims to the Land of Israel, but there is no reference whatsoever to any
Palestinian people dwelling on any land called Filastin during any part of Islamic history until the twentieth century. The term Jund Filastin was used to describe a
military district of the Umayyad and Abbasid Caliphates and had no ethnic or national significance until the Twentieth Century.
The Qur'an declares that the Jews are the chosen people, exalted among the nations of the world. [14] It clearly declares the Jews (Bani Israil) as the only
owners of the Land of Israel, which is al-Ard al-Muqaddasah; al-Ard al-Mubarakah; Ard Bani Israil (the sacred land; the blessed land; the land of the People of Israel),
and they are not allowed to leave it, for otherwise they will be punished: [15] "It is the promise of God, and God does not go back on his promise." [16] The
Qur'an goes on to acknowledge that the Jewish First and Second Kingdoms existed, but states that they were punished by God. [17] Arab ownership of
Palestine is also critically connected to exegesis on the Qur'anic description of Muhammad's Night Journey from Mecca to the "furthest mosque," which is
juxtaposed with a verse on the destroyed Temple of the Israelites. [18] The existence of that temple, however, though it had been acknowledged by officials of the
Islamic religious endowment authority (waqf ) in their publicity materials from the 1920s and 1950s, [19] was famously denied by Arafat in an exchange with U.S.
President Bill Clinton. [20]
Another Palestinian tactic is aimed at co-opting Christianity. For the PA leaders, Jesus is defined as a Palestinian who preached Islam, thus denying not only Jewish
history and Christian legitimacy, but also strengthening ancient Palestinian history. According to this narrative, Jesus was a Muslim prophet, [21] like all other
Jewish-born figures, [22] who was born in Bethlehem, lived in Nazareth, and moved to Jerusalem. [23] Therefore, Jesus the Messiah is a Palestinian par excellence, the
son of Mary the Palestinian. [24] The Virgin Mary, the woman of love and peace, is of the nation of Palestine, whose roots are grounded in the depths of history. [25]
Jesus is a shahid, a holy martyr of Islam, the only Palestinian prophet, and the first Palestinian shahid who was tortured in this land. [26]
DENYING THE JEWISH CONNECTION
In the official Palestinian narrative, the Palestinian people are authentic and indigenous, while it is the Israelis who are the foreigners, invented, and sown in a land
that is not theirs. [27] According to Nabil Alqam, a PA historian, the Israeli state concerns itself with cultural theft and with stealing, distorting, and erasing the
Palestinian heritage, which has a historical depth of 4,000 to 5,000 years. The State of Israel attempts to steal Palestinian symbols and to create a fake Israeli identity. [28]
In his book, Jerusalem, City of Allah, Yunes Amr, President of the al-Quds Open University, claims to disprove all Israeli connections and the history of the Jewish
presence in Palestine, both historically and linguistically, by exposing the falsification of facts and affirming that the Palestinians are Arab Canaanites indigenous to
the land. [29]
Throughout Palestinian media and education, all Israeli cities and areas are featured as Palestinian in origin, including Haifa, Acre, Ashkelon, Jaffa, Safed, Tiberias, Tel
Aviv, Nazareth, the Sea of Galilee, Kiryat Shmonah, and the Negev. These are the "Palestinian homeland" or "occupied Palestine." [30] Instilling these assertions and
psychological worldview as facts among youth and in the political arena requires a multilevel process of socialization and indoctrination, beginning with the education
system. Reinforcement is constant and all-pervasive: Palestine is continually represented as an area of 27,000 sq km, and an overwhelming Palestinian majority believes
this is the truth. [31]
The Palestinians also portray Israelis of today as having no genetic, religious, cultural, or historical connections to the Jews of the past, who are supposed to have
disappeared long ago. Issam Sissalem of the Islamic University in Gaza further claims that the biblical Hebrew tribes were in fact Bedouin. As such, they were Arab
tribes, and there is no connection between them and today's Israeli Jews, who are the descendents of Eurasian Khazars who converted to Judaism. The original
Hebrew tribes were erased and ceased to exist, leaving no traces. [32] Likewise, Jarir al-Qudwa, once educational advisor to Arafat, holds that the Israelites of the Bible
were not only Arab tribes but were among the purest. Fathi Buzia, a PA political commentator, argues that Europe, led by Britain, founded Israel, creating and
implanting a thieving, fabricated entity upon the Palestinian land, in order to get rid of Jews at home. [33]
Israelis are described as religious groups of imposters who were never Jews but part of a Zionist plot to occupy Palestinian lands and steal the Palestinian identity and
cultural heritage. This is derided as the greatest crime ever committed against humanity, with the aim of the Judaization of Palestine. [34] Even the Hebrew language is
said to be stolen from Palestinian Aramaic. [35] The Israeli state creates "false names" for sites to "erase the Palestinian facts." It steals everything it lays its hands on
"by means of terror," including music, food, clothing and folk traditions, even falafel and humus. [36] All the territory held by the state of Israel is occupied, and the
Palestinians will not compromise on it. [37]
In the light of this, Palestinian commentators demand that Zionists must acknowledge publicly before the world that Jews have no connection to Palestinian Arab land.
Zionist history is nothing more than invention and falsification, constituting a crude form of colonialism. [38] Zionists are trying to create a fake history at the expense
of a real Palestinian history so as to steal the history and the culture of the Palestinians. [39]
THE PALESTINIAN "NATION'S MODERN FOUNDATIONS
The alleged Zionist process of theft and usurpation is, in fact, precisely the official Palestinian policy toward Jewish history.
The paradoxical fact is that Palestinian nationalism effectively owes its creation to Zionism, the Jewish national movement. [40] Stimulated partially by the
disintegration of the Ottoman Empire and the search for Arab national identities, the main lines of Palestinian nationalism developed during the 1920s and 1930s in
reaction to and in contrast with Zionism.
Though Palestinians claim descent from Canaanites, the fact is that there has never been any historical Palestinian state, nor any indigenous political system and
institutions. The Land of Israel witnessed many conquerors over the course of its history, but in the last two thousand years since most of the people of Israel went
into exile — albeit not without leaving an uninterrupted presence in the land — it was not the home of any indigenous political entity. Not only has there never been a
Palestinian state and a Palestinian people, but there were no other political entities besides those established by invading forces, such as the crusading statelets or
district capitals created by Umayyad and Abbasid caliphs.
Most of the population now known as Palestinian descended from migrants originating from the surrounding Arab countries and from local Bedouins. Many migrated
in waves from the middle of the Nineteenth Century to the middle of the Twentieth Century. Others were imported by the Ottoman Empire and by the British for
infrastructure and agricultural projects, or migrated to the region following Zionist economic success, which produced a staggering population growth. [41]
Palestinians are perhaps the newest of all peoples, comprising many scattered groups. In fact, in origin they are more Egyptian, Syrian, Jordanian, Lebanese, and
mainly Bedouin, than Palestinian.
Perhaps the most conspicuous fact regarding the novelty of the Palestinian nation is that when it was within their power, the Arab leaders never seriously sought to
create a Palestinian state during the 1940s, and after the establishment of the State of Israel, from 1948 until 1967, when the West Bank and Gaza were under Egyptian
and Jordanian direct rule. Moreover, during that time, all Arab leaders referred to the Palestinian issue as a refugee problem. They did not call for the creation of a
Palestinian state for the Palestinian nation. Even after the 1967 Six-Day War, United Nations Resolution 242 of November 22, 1967, mentions only "refugees," not even
"Arab refugees" — let alone a Palestinian people and a Palestinian state. [42] Calls in earnest for a Palestinian state did not begin in the United Nations or elsewhere
until the late 1960s or the early 1970s. [43]
Even today, as all Arab states pay lip service to the idea of a Palestinian state, and Palestinian leaders are treated as equals by their Arab counterparts, it is far from
clear that a Palestinian state is a real priority. If the Palestinians are a people today, they are indeed a new invention. However, do they deserve a state? Establishment
of a Palestinian state would rightly open the floodgates for the creation of numerous states based on both new and old national identities. The Kurds and the Berbers,
for example, have lived for centuries in the Middle East. They are distinct and ancient peoples that were not invented in the full light of history, but unfortunately,
their existence does not translate automatically into statehood. If it did, such a process of granting statehood to all peoples would begin to unravel the fabric of the
modern Arab world. Arab leaders, especially under pressure from the Arab upheavals of 2011, show no enthusiasm for this.
WHAT DO PALESTINIANS WANT?
The important question is what Palestinians really want. What are the Palestinians' political objectives, and how do they wish to realize them? All their leaders'
declarations and policies clearly show that they have never moderated their primary objective, which is to eliminate the State of Israel. From the Abadan ("never")
rhetoric of the 1920s through 1948 to Arafat's "phased strategy," adopted at the June, 1974, Palestinian National Congress, [44] Palestinians still lay claim to a land
"from the river to the sea." Palestinians appear unwilling to compromise, to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, or to accept an Israeli state on any territory they call
Filastin.
It is also evident that Palestinian political evolution is closely tied to Israel's territorial and political development in two continuous phases. The first emerged after
Israel's independence in 1948 and differentiated the Palestinians as a social group of Arab refugees, also called "Palestine Arabs," and lacking obvious cultural,
social, or political characteristics that distinguished them from their Arab kin, who largely reviled them. The second phase developed after the 1967 Six-Day War;
Palestinians then became a political group seeking to develop a national identity during the period of global anti-imperial and anti-colonial ferment. But, even as a
Palestinian national identity has been developed and marketed, it is overwhelmingly founded on the negation of its rival, namely Jewish and Israeli identity, rather
than on positive attributes or real history.
Given this, how have Palestinians been so successful in disseminating their message in the international arena? What brings them the overwhelming political and
financial support at the expense of so many nations and other peoples, such as the Kurds and the Berbers, who are denied the chance to establish a state? [45]
Part of the answer is perhaps the Palestinians' sophisticated ploy of telling all players what they want to hear. In the international arena, the Palestinians emphasize
the ideologies of post-colonialism, post-modernism, and multiculturalism. They depict themselves as the victims of colonial Zionism that has stolen their land and
express the wish to establish Palestine as a small or even a multicultural state. [46] In Europe, where there is a high level of guilt and remorse about its own
colonialist past, the Palestinians depict Israel as the last remnant of the bygone European colonialist era and directly blame Europe for the creation of the Jewish
state. [47] Israel is accused of occupying the land that belongs solely to the Palestinian people, and, worse, Israel is accused of perpetuating Nazi methods and
committing genocide against the Palestinians. [48] These Palestinian accusations are supported by European intellectuals and Leftists who feel remorse about the
colonial era and who do not wish to be reminded any further about the Nazi atrocities.
In the United States, where many feel guilt and remorse over historic racism, the Palestinians depict Israel as a racist state, which treats them in the same way as
African-Americans were treated. [49] For human rights organizations, Israel is a cruel occupier that violates all human rights and freedoms of the Palestinians. [50]
In world public opinion, Israel is depicted as an oppressive society that perpetuates systematic extermination and ethnic cleansing. [51] And, to Palestinians and
other Muslims, the prospect of a Palestinian state is represented as the creation of another proud Arab or pious Muslim state.
The question remains why the international community accepts the Palestinians' claims regarding their fabricated past and the corresponding negation of the Jews.
Oil, ignorance, anti-Semitism, and a politically correct unwillingness to offer any challenge to such falsehoods, all play a role. Still, it is difficult to recall a time in
modern history when one group of people openly expressed such visceral animosity and hatred and declared its eagerness to eliminate a neighboring state and its
people, while the international arena ignored and, in fact, enabled and legitimized it.
CONCLUSION
Palestinian Arabs, as opposed to Arabic-speaking residents, have not been in the area west of the Jordan River from the Islamic occupation, from the Ottoman
Empire, or even from British rule since 1917. No Palestinian state has ever existed, and so, no Palestinian people has ever been robbed of its land. There is no
language or dialect known as Palestinian; there is no Palestinian culture distinct from that of surrounding Arab ones; and there has never been a land known as
Palestine governed by Palestinians at any time in history. For these reasons, Palestinians have been driven to fabricate a past by denying and expropriating that
of Jews and Israel.
Only after the Palestinian leadership comes to terms with Israel's legitimacy and recognizes it as a Jewish state, can one begin discussing the emergence of a
Palestinian state that lives in peace beside the State of Israel.
NOTES:
[1] All references from Palestinian Authority media are taken from Palestinian Media Watch.
[2] Palestinian al-Fath TV, May 14, 2011.
[3] Al-Ayyam (Ramallah), Sept. 11, 2006.
[4] Palestinian al-Fath TV, July 25, 2004.
[5] Al-Hayat al-Jadida (Ramallah), July 3, 2010.
[6] Ibid., Dec. 3, 2010.
[7] Palestinian al-Fath TV, repeatedly from 2005-07.
[8] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Mar. 17, 2009, Dec. 11, 2011.
[9] Palestinian al-Fath TV, Feb. 20, 2011.
[10] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Oct. 21, 2010.
[11] Ibid., July 8, 2011.
[12] Ibid., Nov. 18, 2005, Dec. 19, 2011.
[13] David Wenkel, "Palestinians, Jebusites, and Evangelicals," Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2007, pp. 49-56.
[14] Qur: al-Baqarah, 2:47; ad-Dukhan, 44:32.
[15] Qur: al-Maidah, 5:21; al-A'araf, 7:137; Bani Israil, 17:104.
[16] Qur: ar-Rum, 30:6.
[17] Qur: Bani Israil, 17:104-7.
[18] Ibid., 17: 1, 7.
[19] Philip Mattar, "The Role of the Mufti of Jerusalem in the Political Struggle over the Western Wall, 1928-1929," Middle Eastern Studies, Jan. 1983, pp. 104-18; Muhammad Amin al-Husseini, Haqa'ik An Qadiyat Filastin (Cairo: n.p., 1957), pp. 115-9.
[20] See Yitzhak Reiter, Jerusalem and Its Role in Islamic Solidarity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 1-2.
[21] Qur: al-Imran, 3:51-2; an-Nisa, 4:171; al-Maidah, 5:111.
[22] Qur: al-Baqarah, 2:127-8, 133; al-Imran, 3:84; Yunus, 10:71-2, 84.
[23] Palestinian al-Fath TV, Apr. 21, 2006; al-Hayat al-Jadida, Mar. 9, Oct. 28, 2006.
[24] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Nov. 18, 2005; Palestinian al-Fath TV, May 12, 2009.
[25] com.Palvoice Mar. 17, 2010.
[26] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, June 24, Dec. 11, 2000, June 17, 2005, Oct. 28, 2006, Apr. 30, Nov. 18, 2008; Palestinian al-Fath TV, June 9, Dec. 24, 2009.
[27] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Dec. 11, 2011.
[28] Palestinian al-Fath TV, Oct. 22, 2009.
[29] Al-Ayyam, Apr. 7, 2009.
[30] Palestinian al-Fath TV, Apr. 11, June 14, 24, Sept. 2, Nov. 1, 2011; al-Hayat al-Jadida, Jan. 31, June 17, 20, 2011.
[31] Palestinian al-Fath TV, May 16, June 11, 25, July 5, Aug. 12, 13, 19, 2010.
[32] Ibid., July 25, 2004.
[33] Ibid., June 17, 2009.
[34] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Apr. 4, May 26, 2011; Palestinian al-Fath TV, May 23, 2011.
[35] Palestinian al-Fath TV, Dec. 7, 2010, Feb. 8, July 15, 2011; al-Hayat al-Jadida, May 15, July 1, 2011.
[36] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Dec. 16, 2010, Apr. 4, May 16, July 5, Dec. 8, 2011; Palestinian al-Fath TV, Dec. 23, 2010.
[37] Al-Hayat al-Jadida, Aug. 18, 2011.
[38] Ibid., May 27, 2011.
[39] Palestinian al-Fath TV, May 23, 2011.
[40] Daniel Pipes, "Mirror Image: How the PLO Mimics Zionism," National Interest, Fall 1994; idem, "Mirror Image: Palestinians Continue to Mimic Zionism," DanielPipes.org, Jan. 10, 2008.
[41] See, for example, Efraim Karsh, Palestine Betrayed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010), pp. 2-16; Fred M. Gottheil, "The Smoking Gun: Arab Immigration into Palestine, 1922-1931," Middle East Quarterly, Winter 2003, pp. 53-64; Arieh L. Avneri, The Claim of Dispossession, Jewish Land Settlement and the Arabs, 1878-1948 (Edison, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1982), pp. 162-80.
[42] U.N .Security Council, "Resolution 242 of November 22, 1967."
[43] See, for example, "10 Point Program," Palestine National Council, Cairo, June 8, 1974.
[44] "Political Program for the Present Stage Drawn up by the 12th PNC, Cairo, June 9, 1974," Journal of Palestine Studies, Summer 1974, pp. 224-5.
[45] James Minehan, Nations without States (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1996), index.
[46] Hanan Ashrawi, Palestinian legislator, al-Hayat al-Jadidah, Dec. 27, 2011; Issa Karake, minister of prisoners' affairs, al-Hayat al-Jadidah, Nov. 24, 2011; Bassam Eid, "Can a Bi-National State Be a Solution to the Middle East Conflict," Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, Jerusalem, 2009.
[47] Fayez A. Sayegh, "Zionist Colonialism in Palestine," Research Center Palestine Liberation Organization, Beirut, Sept. 1965; Gilbert Achcar, "The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives," Open Democracy, London, Apr. 19, 2010.
[48] See, for example, Marwan Bishara, Palestine/Israel: Peace or Apartheid. Occupation, Terrorism and the Future (London: Zed Press, 2003); Ziyad Abu Ein, Palestinian Authority deputy minister of prisoners' affairs, interview, Palestinian Fatah TV, Oct. 6, 2011; al-Hayat al-Jadidah, Apr. 17, July 5, Oct. 3, 2011.
[49] See, for example, Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid? A re-assessment of Israel's practices in the occupied Palestinian territories under international law (Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa, 2009); Jamal Dajani, "Israel: Occupation or Apartheid?" The Huffington Post (New York), Feb. 5, 2010; Uri Davis, Israel: An Apartheid State (London: Zed Books, 2002), pp. 55, 61.
[50] See, for example, "Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories: The 2011 Report," Amnesty International, New York, accessed Mar. 12, 2012; "Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territories, Events of 2009," World Report 2010, Human Rights Watch, New York, accessed Mar. 12, 2012.
[51] See, for example, Ha'aretz (Tel Aviv), Oct. 31, 2009; Inter Press Service (Rome), Mar. 23, 2011; Asia News (Bangkok), Mar. 22, 2011.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Israel, Arabs, & the Islamic Middle East -- The Israeli-Arab Conflict;
Israeli Politics, Government, & Public Policy -- Public Issues & Controversies;
The State of Israel in War & Peace -- Israel's Role in International Relations;
Israeli Military Defense & National Security -- The Israeli Economy
The Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States, & Their Regional Neighbors
American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East
Islamism & Jihadism -- Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Dr. David Bukay is Professor of Middle East Studies, teaching in the Department of Political Science at the University of Haifa in Israel. His fields of specialization
include (1) international terrorism and militant Islam, (2) the culture approach to study, research, and analysis regarding Middle Eastern politics, (3) the Israeli-Arab
conflict, (4) relations among Arab states and the Palestinian Arab problem, and (5) Syria's foreign policy vis-a-vis Lebanon and Israel.
Books authored by Dr. Bukay include From Muhammad to Bin Laden: Religious and Ideological Sources of the Homicide Bombers Phenomenon (Transaction
Publishers, 2008); Arafat, the Palestinian National Movement, and Israel: The Politics of Masks and Paradox Mellen Press, 2005); Arab-Islamic Political
Culture (Ariel Center for Policy Research, 2003); Total Terrorism in the Name of Allah: The Emergence of the New Islamic Fundamentalists (Ariel Center for
Policy Research, 2002). Also, Dr. Bukay edited Muhammad's Monsters: A Comprehensive Guide to Radical Islam for Western Audiences (Green Forest,
Arkansas: Balfour Books, 2004).
The foregoing article by Dr. Bukay was originally published in the Middle East Quarterly, Summer, 2012, and
can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum, a foreign policy think tank which seeks to
define and promote American interests in the Middle East, defining U.S. interests to include fighting radical Islam,
working for Palestinian Arab acceptance of the State of Israel, improving the management of U.S. efforts to promote
constitutional democracy in the Middle East, reducing America's energy dependence on the Middle East, more robustly
asserting U.S. interests vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia, and countering the Iranian threat.
(URL: http://www.meforum.org/3273/palestinian-founding-national-myths)
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
June 27, 2012
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIV, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity