THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume V, Issue # 155, June 11, 2003
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

THE GREAT NATIONAL LAND GRAB
By Peyton Knight

Land grabbers in Congress, led by Rep. Joel Hefley (R-CO), want to pass federal legislation (H.R. 1427) to create a National Heritage Areas program. Property rights advocates must be on the alert and prepared to fight to ensure that such a program never comes into existence.

National Heritage Areas present many dangers to traditional property rights and local zoning.  Here are a few of the more serious implications and problems associ- ated with an NHA program:

I. National Heritage Areas are de facto federal zoning.  Despite proponents' claims to the contrary, as federal dollars flow from Washington to individual NHAs, inevitably, federal strings are attached.  One of these strings is federal zoning mandates.  For example, when the Augusta Canal NHA was undergoing initial approval, the National Park Service urged the House Resources Committee to withhold federal funds from Augusta Canal until a commitment was shown by those overseeing the creation of the NHA to implement stricter zoning laws and even create a State park.  Land use and zoning is an inherent function of local government.  NHAs promote a top-down, federal approach to land use that would spell disaster for local communi- ties.

II. National Heritage Areas stifle local initiative and control.  When born of local initiative, planning and money, Heritage Areas are more apt to have the consensus of the property and business owners within their boundaries.  Indeed, there are many State Heritage Areas that are totally sustained by local businesses and governments, operating free of federal money or intrusion.  National Heritage Areas oper- ate quite differently.  It is not necessarily the desire of the local community to create a NHA in their area, but rather the desire of a special interest group or a federal agency.  Preliminary boundaries are drawn, locals are inadequately informed of the pending NHA designation, federal money and assistance is wafted under the noses of local officials, and the process goes forward, despite what is in the best interest or desire of the community. 

III. Property owners are not properly notified when their land falls within the bound- aries of a proposed National Heritage Area.  It is morally imperative that landown- ers be notified any time a federal designation could affect their property rights in any manner.  Yet proponents of National Heritage Areas refuse to offer this most com- mon courtesy.  This is because they fear opposition to NHA designations and would rather spring the news on unsuspecting landowners.

IV. National Heritage Areas not only promote federal land acquisition, but also ac- quire land themselves.  Both the Cane River and Shenandoah National Battlefields National Heritage Areas are authorized to use federal funds for land acquisition, and thus, have created national parks within their boundaries.  Others, such as the Riv- ers of Steel NHA in Pennsylvania, are openly lobbying for land acquisition and park creation.  Property owners within these NHAs must now contend with ideologically driven land trusts partnered with federal agencies hungry to either acquire their land or restrict its use.

V. A National Heritage Areas program would grow exponentially and become a mas- sive funding burden to the federal government.  A National Heritage Areas program could not come at a worse time.  Once a National Heritage Area program is estab- lished, local government officials and non-governmental organizations will clamor for more and more federal dollars.  As the program grows out of control, so too will its strain on the federal budget and its burden on a National Park Service that is already facing a multi-billion dollar maintenance backlog. 

The National Heritage Areas program is an expensive, insidious attempt by non-governmental organizations and federal agencies to impose land use controls and zoning mandates on unsuspecting local communities.  It is my view, and the view of others in the property rights community, that there is zero justification for such a program at the federal level.  The Senate Resources Committee has a golden opportunity to quash this dangerous program before it spreads like wildfire throughout the nation, devouring local communities.

More on Policy Issues Relating to
Energy, Environment, & Natural Resources



Peyton Knight is the Director of Legislative Affairs for the American Policy Center, a grassroots, activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, VA. The American Policy Center maintains an Internet site at www.americanpolicy.org and is located at 98 Alexandria Pike (#43), Warrenton, Virginia, 20186. Telephone Number: (540) 341-8911.


Copyright 2003 Peyton Knight



Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com




Return to Top of Page

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume V, 2003


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity