Falling Crime:
These stereotypes may be based on what has been true in the past, but they have not kept up well with recent developments. Official crime statistics show a dramatic drop in border crime rates in the 1990s. While the border crime rate was 30 percent higher than the national crime rate in 1990, the difference was only 12 percent in 2000. The bulk of the improvement came in property-related crimes (such as auto theft, larceny and burglary), which dropped 40 percent between 1990 and 2000. Violent crimes (including assault, robbery, rape and homicide), while representing only 12 percent of total crime, also dropped sharply, falling 29 percent over the decade.
Improvements in the crime rate during the 1990s were not restricted to the South- west border (Chart 1). National crime rates declined right along with border rates. This phenomenon has received much attention among researchers trying to under- stand the reasons underlying these changes. The consensus attributes the downward trend to several factors at the national level: the end of the crack epidemic, a grow- ing prison population, changing demographics, and rapid economic growth. Higher imprisonment rates and demographic change reduced the size of the population most at risk for committing crime. Tougher laws kept more criminals in jail for longer sentences, while demographic change resulted in fewer people in the highest-risk group (males ages 14–24).
These factors, especially the pace of economic growth, have likely had a substantial impact on the border as well. Most border areas
grew quickly in the 1990s. Job cre- ation outpaced population growth in many border cities, and most areas experienced large drops in
the unemployment rate. Research has shown that when faced with more labor market opportunities, individuals are less likely to
resort to crime.
Rising Border Enforcement:
Another factor—one unique to the border region—has also played a role in lowering crime rates. In the 1990s, the
U.S.A.–Mexico border experienced a resurgence in illegal immigration and, as a result, an unprecedented buildup of border
enforcement. While some might expect illegal immigration to be correlated with higher crime rates, mostly indirectly through the role
of smugglers, border enforcement should be work- ing in the opposite direction. In this case, the end result, falling aggregate crime
rates, suggests that border enforcement and the other factors discussed above won out.
Border enforcement along the U.S.A.–Mexico border consists predominantly of the Border Patrol. Over 9,000 Border Patrol
agents currently man the border with Mex- ico. At the same time, enforcement has increasingly come to rely on technological ad- vances
and other hardware in locating and apprehending undocumented immigrants. Today’s Border Patrol uses everything from
remote video surveillance, motion de- tectors, mobile infrared nightscopes and helicopters to old-fashioned barriers such as walls,
floodlights and road checkpoints. Although the Border Patrol does not typically apprehend criminals who commit nonimmigration
offenses, like the ones we are con- sidering here, the Border Patrol’s visibility and the omnipresent monitoring devices and
checkpoints throughout the border region deter all forms of crime.
This point is best illustrated by looking at the impact on crime of two major border enforcement offensives in the early to mid-1990s:
Operation Hold-the-Line in El Paso in 1993 and Operation Gatekeeper in San Diego in 1994. As Chart 2 shows, in the year following
the introduction of Hold-the-Line in El Paso, property crime rates fell 17.6 percent (the national rate declined only 1 percent). In the
year after Gate- keeper was introduced, property crime rates in San Diego fell 16 percent (the na- tional rate declined only 2.3 percent).
Given this preliminary evidence of a possible causal relationship between enforce- ment and crime, we tested this in an econometric
model where we controlled for eco- nomic conditions, the volume of immigration and other variables. We found that a 10 percent
increase in monthly linewatch hours (equivalent to adding about 515 full-time agents) leads to a 0.3 percent fall in the monthly
property crime rate (equivalent to about 862 fewer property crimes per year).
Redistributing Crime:
Despite this good news about border crime rates and the role of the Border Patrol, a set of second-order effects deserves attention.
The overall border crime rate has fallen substantially from its 1990 peak, but the bulk of the improvement has been concentrated, not
surprisingly, in the communities targeted for early border enforce- ment initiatives, namely San Diego and El Paso. Most border counties,
albeit much smaller than San Diego and El Paso, did not experience declines as steep as the na- tional drop and thus have become
relatively more crime ridden in 2000 compared with the nation
The lesson in this analysis is that until border enforcement initiatives impact the en- tire Southwest border, crackdowns in one area may
result in fewer crimes in that vicinity but also in a redistribution of crimes to other areas. For example, in the years that Hold-the-Line
and Gatekeeper were introduced, the neighboring counties of Hudspeth, Texas, and Imperial, Calif., both experienced relatively large
increases in their crime rates. These second-order effects have already been apparent in the changing geographic pattern of illegal
immigration. The traditional migrant gateways of Tijuana–San Diego and Juárez–El Paso have been replaced
by migrant flows through smaller, less patrolled towns in Arizona and South Texas.
Getting tough on the border has had positive spillovers on border crime rates. The border has realized marked declines in the incidence
of crime. However, the crime that is occurring has become more equally distributed across border counties. Less populated counties
are contending with a greater share of border crimes, a develop- ment that likely stems in part from the launching of the border offensives
Gatekeep- er and Hold-the-Line. This may not be a significant problem as long as crime rates continue to fall, but that trend may already
have been reversed. Since mid-1999, the downward trend in border crime has flattened considerably.
Pia M. Orrenius is a senior economist in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Roberto Coronado is
an economic analyst in the Research Department of the Bank’s El Paso Branch.
Reprinted from Southwest Economy
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Issue 3, May/June, 2003
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume V, 2003
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 *
American Government 3 *
American Government 4
American Government 5 *
American Politics *
Anglosphere *
Arabs
Arms Control & WMD *
Aztlan Separatists *
Big Government
Black Africa *
Bureaucracy *
Canada *
China *
Civil Liberties *
Communism
Congress, U.S. *
Conservative Groups *
Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law *
Counterterrorism *
Criminal Justice *
Disloyalty *
Economy
Education *
Elections, U.S. *
Eminent Domain *
Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World *
Ethnicity & Race *
Europe *
Europe: Jews
Family Values *
Far East *
Fiscal Policy, U.S. *
Foreign Aid, U.S. *
Foreign Policy, U.S.
France *
Hispanic Separatism *
Hispanic Treason *
Human Health *
Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. *
Intelligence, U.S. *
Iran *
Iraq *
Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat *
Islamism *
Israeli vs. Arabs *
Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism *
Jihad Manifesto I *
Jihad Manifesto II *
Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments *
Judiciary, American *
Latin America *
Latino Separatism
Latino Treason *
Lebanon *
Leftists/Liberals *
Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. *
Marriage & Family *
Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs *
Middle East: Iran *
Middle East: Iraq *
Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon *
Middle East: Syria *
Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey *
Militant Islam *
Military Defense *
Military Justice
Military Weaponry *
Modern Welfare State *
Morality & Decency
National Identity *
National Security *
Natural Resources *
News Media Bias
North Africa *
Patriot Act, USA *
Patriotism *
Political Culture *
Political Ideologies
Political Parties *
Political Philosophy *
Politics, American *
Presidency, U.S.
Private Property *
Property Rights *
Public Assistance *
Radical Islam
Religion & America *
Rogue States & WMD *
Russia *
Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason *
Senate, U.S. *
Social Welfare Policy *
South Africa
State Government, U.S. *
Subsaharan Africa *
Subversion *
Syria *
Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 *
Treason & Sedition *
Tunisia *
Turkey *
Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity *
UN & Its Agencies *
USA Patriot Act *
U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure *
U.S. Intelligence *
U.S. Senate *
War & Peace
Welfare Policy *
WMD & Arms Control
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE