THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 21, January 29, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
LIARS! LIARS! GREEN PANTS ON FIRE!
"GLOBAL WARMING" & THE LIES SPREAD BY ENVIRONMENTALISTS
By Alan Caruba
What else can you call the authors of an article in an early January edition of the journal, Nature. What else can you call
them, other than liars? Their assertion of mass extinctions of species by 2050, resulting from global warming, is pure fiction, but it
was trumpeted in a January 7 press release from Conservation International as the “most comprehensive analysis to date.” And it
received worldwide news coverage.
As this is being written, the temperature outside my window is about ten degrees above zero, and mid-to-late January is setting
records for frigid arctic air flowing from the North. One would think that the press might pause a moment to contemplate the
weather outside, actual weather records, and the claim of political environmentalists and their media allies that global warming is
just around the corner. It bothers me that the press, after decades of this kind of Green blather, is so irresponsible about such
stories. Unfailingly, they leap upon the wild claim and rarely, if ever, seek credible scientists to refute it. If they do find someone
to quote, it is always buried deep in the story.
The other thing that really bothers me is that it was just one more Big Green Lie from socalled "scientists" in the never-ending
effort to frighten the public into believing that (1) the global warming theory has any basis in fact and (2) that every human
activity on Earth must be made subservient to avoid it. Conservation International (CI) began by claiming “Climate change could
drive more than a quarter of land animals and plants into extinction, according to a major new study published in tomorrow’s
edition of the journal, Nature.”
Patrick J. Michaels, a senior fellow in Environmental Studies at the Cato Institute, writing in the January 15 issue of the
Washington Times, issued a timely warming: “The politicization of scientific papers on global warming and the tendency
of science journals to rush to judgment have to end.”
Notice, too, that the Greens have dropped “global warming” in favor of the term “climate change.” This might be because their
effort to get the United Nations’ Kyoto Protocol on Climate Control ratified has proved a massive failure. Its socalled "science"
has been refuted. (Even the Russians refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, once they realized it would destroy their nascent
capitalist economy. This is a treaty that exempted Red China and India from even having to participate!) It was the same
socalled "science" journal, Nature, which, in 1996, published a paper supporting the global warming theory, just one
day before the UN conference that gave birth to the Kyoto Protocol.
CI informs us that it “applies innovations in science, economics, policy, and community participation to protect the Earth’s richest
regions of plant and animal diversity in the hotspots, major tropical wilderness areas, and key marine ecosystems. With
headquarters in Washington, D.C., CI works in almost 40 countries on four continents.” Apparently, “innovations” include
publishing bogus "scientific studies."
As the Competitive Enterprise Institute was quick to point out, the latest study, co-authored by 19 “researchers”, was based on
“computer modeling” for its predictions. Global warming is, of course, also based on computer modeling. There isn’t a computer,
or even a system of linked computers, large enough to reliably predict the weather much beyond three to five days. In February,
2003, the worst blizzard in seven years shut down a broad swath of the eastern United States. The National Weather Service, which
has some of the most sophisticated computers ever made, was very, very surprised by the severity of the blizzard.
The weather is the very definition of chaos. No computer model can possibly take in the constant changes that occur everywhere
on the globe. At best, they do a credible job of spotting conditions about forty-eight to seventy-two hours ahead of events.
Computer “models” can produce just about any result they are intended to achieve. Statistics can lie, and liars can use statistics.
Writing for Tech Central Station in early January, Iain Murray neatly dispatched the conclusion of the study. “There are several
reasons this claim should be laughed out of the court of public opinion. First, the research doesn’t say what the researchers
themselves claim. They have extrapolated to all species a model that looked at only 1,103 species in certain areas (243 of those
species were South American poroteaceae, a family of evergreen shrubs and trees). For one thing, we don’t know how many
species there are --- estimates vary from 2 million to 80 million --- and we have only documented 1.6 million. However, assuming
the 14 million figure widely used in the press reports is anywhere near accurate, the same size is a mere 0.008 percent of the total
species population of the plant…”
So, based on 0.008 percent of ALL species on Earth, CI and this group of loathsome little researchers felt free to predict the
extinction of more than a million species. They ignored the fact that an increase in the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, would have
a most salutary effect of enhancing the growth of all manner of vegetation worldwide. Those creatures that dine on that vegetation
would no doubt benefit and reproduce in greater numbers. In short, the study was bunkum!
Murray concludes his analysis of this latest study by noting: “In a world that has seen a grand total of just over 1,000 documented
extinctions since 1600, these wild predictions should be ignored as alarmist hyperbole.” He’s being polite.
It is alarmist and it is hyperbole, but it also represents virtually every socalled "scientific" study that has been put forth by the
Greens on the topic of global warming. Oh, excuse me, “climate change.” Never mind that the climate changes all the time and
always will, it is hardly a reason to return to the golden age of horse-drawn buggies, outhouses, and the use of oxen in agriculture.
We are rapidly reaching the point of critical mass where all such Green claims should lead to the implosion of this evil social and
economic philosophy and quasi-religion that worships the Earth and would gladly see the entire human race go extinct to “save”
the Earth from us.
No, millions of species will not go extinct by 2050, but one can fervently pray that the environmentalist movement will.
More on Policy Issues Relating to
Energy, Environment, & Natural Resources
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, Communications Director of the American Policy Center,
and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly
column, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center
(www.anxietycenter.com). A compilation of his past col- umns, entitled Warning Signs, is published by Merril Press. In addition
to Warning Signs, Caruba is the author of A Pocket Guide to Militant Islam and The United Na- tions vs. the United States,
both of which are available from the National Anxiety Center, 9 Brookside Road, Maplewood, New Jersey, 07040.
Copyright 2004 Alan Caruba
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy