THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 41, February 26, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
WHY DO PEOPLE HATE BUSH?
By Alan Caruba
Here on Mount Olympus, where poets and pundits like myself take dinner with the ancient gods, it is easy to lose touch with what people
are saying these days about George W. Bush.
Fortunately, there is email. And my email is filling up with various versions of the same message from Conservatives. They fear and,
in many cases, even hate him. This isn’t everyone, of course. Lots of people still like and trust him, but, in terms of getting re-elected,
someone in the White House ought to worry about those who should be President Bush's political base of support.
I am not surprised by the passionate hatred some Democrats express, nor am I surprised that hatred plays a role in our political views.
During much of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s terms in the White House, Republicans could barely speak his name. They commonly
referred to him as “that man” through gritted teeth. Many could barely stand “Tricky Dick” Nixon, scorning him while he was in office
and delighting in the Watergate scandal that ended his tenure. Many, including myself, detested Bill Clinton, who disgraced himself
and the Oval Office.
Presidents, for all their power, are frequently flawed personalities. Their quest for the political power and influence attached to the U.S.
Presidency is often their greatest blind spot. We don’t generally elect angels. We elect men who have demonstrated a capacity for
leadership. When they try to lead us somewhere we don’t want to go, we reject them or elect someone else. This happened to the late
Lyndon B. Johnson. Or ask Jimmy Carter. Ask George H.W. Bush.
These days, the President is trying to lead the nation into a world where American power is being used to transform the Middle East
cesspool of violence and ignorance. He’s no great orator like Ronald Reagan and, in fact, he’s not that good a communicator at all. He
keeps the press at arm’s distance most of the time. In short, he’s not making a case for this paradigm shift from waiting to be attacked
again to eliminating the problem at its source.
These days, too, there is a strong, subterranean flow of hot political lava that is reflected in many voices, some influential, some just
ordinary citizens, all joined in a mutual fear of where Bush has taken the nation. It’s more than just a disagreement over policy. It is a
deep distrust and animus toward the man.
What Bush cannot afford is to have Conservatives who will stay home on Election Day. The question must be asked, why are so
many “fiscal” and “social” Republicans and/or Conservatives inclined to abandon Bush? The answer is they think he has abandoned
them.
The answer is that, these days, the President mostly talks about 9-11 and the threat of terrorism and about generating new jobs,
although he seems to be backing off the latter topic of late. Many are buying into the view that Bush “lied” us into the Iraq war. Some
recall that Lyndon B. Johnson most certainly lied us into a broader involvement in Vietnam. Those same people forget the years of
fruitless UN resolutions, all of which were based on the belief that Saddam Hussein had scads of WMDs.
Has the memory of over 3,000 dead Americans on 9-11 faded so swiftly? Yes. Does terrorism exist worldwide? Yes. Do tyrannical
governments sponsor it? Yes. Is the threat real? Yes. Despite this, many erroneously think that al-Qa'ida and other terrorist groups
are now just a Bush boogeyman used to convince us to give up our constitutional rights.
The swift creation of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has not brought about a sense of security. For example, many resent
that our nation’s borders remain wide open to thousands of illegal aliens, mostly Mexicans, who come across at will. No one seems to
favor the Bush administration immigration proposals. Few believe that any real progress has been made to secure our borders, our
airports, or much else that enters our ports.
Still others don’t think the economy is improving. By almost any indicator, however, it is. The statistics about Gross National Product
and about Wall Street mean nothing to people who cannot find work, whose business is not doing well or whose life savings cannot
sustain a decent retirement.
What then is the alternative? At this writing, it would appear that U.S. Senator John Kerry may carry the Democratic Party banner in
the 2004 presidential election. I have yet to have heard the senator speak in anything but platitudes. His message is “change”, but
every political party promises change.
Kerry runs as a Vietnam veteran, but his service there is vastly diminished by the fact that he claimed his fellow veterans were war
criminals. In the years since, he has done nothing to support the build up of our national defense, nor has he done anything to
support efforts to meet the need for a vastly improved intelligence community to avoid and deter further 9-11s. His voting record is
more Liberal than Teddy Kennedy’s. Do Republicans, however disaffected they may be, want to vote for that?
It would do Republicans some good to recall that Al Gore came within a whisper of being elected President in 2000. Now Gore shows
up on a record-breaking cold day to declare that global warming is coming or is seen bellowing that Bush “betrayed” the nation. How
nuts is that?
It’s conventional wisdom that there’s a long time to go before the national election and a lot can happen between now and then. What
I am wondering is whether the animus, the hostility, among a large number of Republicans/Conservatives toward Bush will diminish. If
it does not, it well may be the independent vote that keeps him in office.
I could be wrong. I have other friends who predict he will win in a landslide and bring a lot of Republicans into Congress with him. It’s
hard to tell from way up here on Mount Olympus.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Americaln Politics & Political Competition
American Government & the U.S. Presidency
Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, Communications Director of the American Policy Center,
and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly
column, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center
(www.anxietycenter.com). A compilation of his past col- umns, entitled Warning Signs, is published by Merril Press. In addition
to Warning Signs, Caruba is the author of A Pocket Guide to Militant Islam and The United Na- tions vs. the United States,
both of which are available from the National Anxiety Center, 9 Brookside Road, Maplewood, New Jersey, 07040.
Copyright 2004 Alan Caruba
Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy