THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 109, May 27, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
STEREOTYPING ARABS & MUSLIMS:
WHY HOLLYWOOD IS NOT THE VILLAIN
By Dr. Daniel Mandel
FULL STORY:
Does Hollywood stereotype minority groups? In particular, does it stereotype Arabs and Muslims? And what bearing, if any, do the
answers to these questions have on current United States policy and conduct in Iraq?
Popular films have always stereotyped groups to a greater or lesser extent. But it is often claimed that, having abandoned most
stereotypes -- even the Soviet enemy is gone, along with the Cold War -- Hollywood is clinging to one last set, Arabs and Muslims,
and vilifying those groups for the sake of entertainment.
In short, intolerance and racism is the cause, indoctrination by Hollywood stereotype is the charge, and U.S. aggression against
Middle Easterners is the result -- a claim echoed by Joseph Wakim in The Age of Melbourne, May 11, 2004: "To Bush, the
Arab Is Always the Villain."
As it happens, however, these claims are fanciful. Hollywood has never dispensed with stereotypes. Some -- American
Indians, the Soviets -- have been moderated or even dropped. The public sees these as unjust or dated. Others, held to be adequately
true to life or relevant, persist. Middle Eastern terrorists, Italian mafias, Russian organised crime leagues, and a host of others have all
appeared in recent films, and with reason: such depictions reflect realities known to the film-going public. Add to this a host of other
stock characterisations that have been remarkably constant over the years -- chillingly amoral business executives, urbanely heartless
British politicians and officers, pushy Jewish lawyers, rogue army generals, black street gangs -- and it is clear that generalized
depictions of large swathes of humanity are part of Hollywood's stock in trade.
Because terrorism against Americans is carried out by Arabs and Muslims, there is a basic truth to movies such as True Lies
(1994), Executive Decision (1996), and The Siege (1998) that lends them the minimum authenticity required by viewers
to suspend disbelief.
True Lies is a story about Islamists planning to explode nuclear devices in the U.S.A. Executive Decision deals with
Islamists hijacking a plane and planning to unleash a deadly toxin in the U.S.A. The Siege tells of an Islamist group carrying
out horrific attacks on New York. None of these scenarios lack feasibility, and some of them have since come to pass.
Unsurprisingly, screenwriters focus on realities well known to their audience, and there is simply no escaping the fact that the Middle
East abounds in terrorist groups. That is why the action in, for example, GI Jane (1997), takes place in Libya, rather than Costa
Rica. That is why the terrorists in True Lies are Middle Eastern, rather than Scandinavian.
Even Delta Force (1986), a film rightly criticised by Wakim as gratuitously offensive to Arabs, recalls events -- the public
slaying of an American hostage, the segregating of Jews and Israelis from other airline passengers -- from real life.
In short, stock characters and situations are to be expected in popular fare, and the use of stereotypes is not necessarily reprehensible,
unless it has no basis in fact. Were it otherwise, it would be impossible to depict Nazis or Japanese imperialists without being accused
of racism and vilification.
To the claim that we never see Jews or Blacks depicted this way, the answer must be that the day we have Jewish Osama bin Ladens or
Black Mohammed Attas, we are likely to see their fictional counterparts on the silver screen.
Hollywood, in any case, makes a poor suspect for explaining the brutality of American prison guards in Iraq. No war has ever been
completely free of atrocities, let alone cruelty of the type exhibited by the guards.
Without the aid of Hollywood, armies and militias in many continents have engaged in far worse, not least in the Middle East itself,
where, for example, the depredations of Saddam's genocidal regime attracted less comment than present American misdeeds.
If Hollywood is a poor suspect, so too is George Bush. Agree or disagree on the wisdom of his invading Iraq to remove Saddam
Hussein, Bush has, if anything, gone out of his way to avoid offence to Islam.
Indeed, by describing it often as a religion of peace, and by saying al-Qa'ida terrorists are religious renegades, Bush has strayed into a
province better left to imams and scholars than to politicians. Undoubtedly, his doing so serves a political purpose -- but not the one
of ratcheting up racism.
Criticism of Western politics and popular culture, hauled into court to explain the ills of the Middle East, is often couched in the
language of fair play and pluralism. In fact, however, it tends to become a form of concealment for the region's ills, either through
denial or blame. Neither assists public understanding.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
The Middle East & the Arabs
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three
Page Two
Page One
War & Peace in the Real World
Page Two
Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
U.S. National Security Strategy
Dr Daniel Mandel is Associate Director of the Middle East Forum in Philadelphia and a fellow in history at The University of
Melbourne.
Republished with Permission of the Middle East Forum
Reprinted from the Middle East Forum News
mefnews@meforum.org (MEF NEWS)
May 15, 2004
The original version of the article appeared in the The Age of Melbourne (May 15, 2004) and a copy can be found on the
Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy