WHAT IF JOHN KERRY WINS THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?
THE DISASTROUS FALLOUT FROM A KERRY PRESIDENCY
By Christopher G. Adamo
Just what portion of Kerry’s agenda can be honestly claimed to inspire voters? Hunting trips and frequent visits to Church are not relevant, since they rarely occurred outside of the election season. Furthermore, his voting record, as it pertains to the Second Amendment and issues of concern to America’s Christians, is abysmal.
Consequently, the legitimate focus must remain on those things that he has consistently supported in word and action over the years. And that isn’t much.
Worse yet, those few issues to which he has steadfastly remained loyal are invariably set against the pallid blue backdrop of the United Nations flag, proving an unwavering antipathy towards the national sovereignty and heritage of the country he claims to want to lead.
His answer to all of America’s foreign relations problems, including the annoying “nuisance” of mass murder by Islamic terrorists is: Run to the United Nations and put them in charge of looking out for us. Despite the abject inefficacy of that organization, a greater concern should be how it could be expected to react to an America that proves, by its endorsement of constant backtracking and denials from its own leader, a willingness to accept platitudes and rhetoric in lieu of decisive action to protect its interests.
An America that would stoop to the point of electing John Kerry is an America that is not worthy of respect from the rest of the world, and, under such conditions, will certainly receive none. The nation slumped to these depths once before, when it chose the empty pandering and slippery excuses of a pathological liar by the election of Bill Clinton. It was during his eight years as President that the mortal enemies of America saw their opportunity to metastasize, striking on an ever-increasing scale with impunity prior to 9-11.
Certainly Kerry provokes no more fear of real reprisal than did Bill Clinton. And, like Clinton, Kerry believes that any slick excuse will serve to get him off of the “hot seat,” for the present moment, regardless of negative consequences that will undoubtedly befall the country at some point down the road.
By now, it should be glaringly obvious that Kerry’s only hope for winning this election is a combination of outlandish and fraudulent attacks against his opponent, accompanied by the ominous suppression of truthful rebuttals from his opposition. It was just such shameless posturing and antics that led Conservatives to predict, with nearly absolute certainty, that an “October Surprise,” would be concocted to discredit the President during the final days of the campaign.
Now it is learned that the chief UN arms inspector, who goes by the name of “Mohamed,” has collaborated with the New York Times and CBS to release the bogus “missing munitions” story. It doesn’t require an Iranian rocket scientist to figure out where his loyalties lie.
As was the case with the forged memos, CBS once again shows its own intention to be something other than a news agency. For if the network truly considered the story to be breaking news of great concern to Americans, it would have aired it immediately. By holding off for its intended Sunday night “60 Minutes” broadcast, it proved its objective to be the revelation of a last-minute “bombshell,” with maximum impact on the election.
The calamitous “hay” being made by the Kerry campaign over the concocted story of missing explosives shows once again (as if any new evidence is needed) Kerry’s willingness to say anything, whether stirringly patriotic or blatantly treasonous, for the expediency of the moment. And despite the ability of such words to excite or mollify a disgracefully compliant press, what possible reaction, other than an erosion of America’s credibility, can be expected from the “allies” to whom Kerry so often defers?
Contrary to his assertions, those “allies,” are no real friends of his. What they are, in reality, is supportive of any person or any cause, which will weaken America’s standing on the world scene. Clearly, these nations see him as someone who will have just such an impact on the nation.
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 *
American Government 3 *
American Government 4
American Government 5 *
American Politics *
Anglosphere *
Arabs
Arms Control & WMD *
Aztlan Separatists *
Big Government
Black Africa *
Bureaucracy *
Canada *
China *
Civil Liberties *
Communism
Congress, U.S. *
Conservative Groups *
Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law
Counterterrorism *
Criminal Justice *
Disloyalty *
Economy
Education *
Elections, U.S. *
Eminent Domain *
Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World *
Ethnicity & Race *
Europe *
Europe: Jews
Family Values *
Far East *
Fiscal Policy, U.S. *
Foreign Aid, U.S. *
France
Hispanic Separatism *
Hispanic Treason *
Human Health *
Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. *
Intelligence, U.S. *
Iran *
Iraq *
Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat *
Islamism *
Israeli vs. Arabs *
Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism *
Jihad Manifesto I *
Jihad Manifesto II *
Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments *
Judiciary, American *
Latin America *
Latino Separatism
Latino Treason *
Lebanon *
Leftists/Liberals *
Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. *
Marriage & Family *
Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs *
Middle East: Iran *
Middle East: Iraq *
Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon *
Middle East: Syria *
Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey *
Militant Islam *
Military Defense *
Military Justice
Military Weaponry *
Modern Welfare State *
Morality & Decency
National Identity *
National Security *
Natural Resources *
News Media Bias
North Africa *
Patriot Act, USA *
Patriotism *
Political Culture *
Political Ideologies
Political Parties *
Political Philosophy *
Politics, American *
Presidency, U.S.
Private Property *
Property Rights *
Public Assistance *
Radical Islam
Religion & America *
Rogue States & WMD *
Russia *
Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason *
Senate, U.S. *
Social Welfare Policy *
South Africa
State Government, U.S. *
Subsaharan Africa *
Subversion *
Syria *
Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 *
Treason & Sedition *
Tunisia *
Turkey *
Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity *
UN & Its Agencies *
USA Patriot Act *
U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure *
U.S. Intelligence *
U.S. Senate *
War & Peace
Welfare Policy *
WMD & Arms Control