THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 236, November 8, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
THE "MODERATE" AGENDA: A DANGEROUS PROSPECT
By Christopher G. Adamo
THE CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN VICTORY IN THE PRESIDENTIAL & CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS OF 2004 -- WHY THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY LEADERSHIP IN THE CONGRESS & THE PRESIDENCY MUST HEED THE CONSERVATIVE MESSAGE SENT FORTH SO CLEARLY
BY THE AMERICAN VOTERS ON ELECTION DAY & EFFECTIVELY RESIST THE PRESSURES BEING EXERTED BY THE SOCALLED
"MODERATE," OR "CENTRIST." ELITISTS WHO SEEK TO UNDERMINE & NEGATE THE VOTERS' MESSAGE BY PERSUADING THE
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP TO PURSUE A POLICY AGENDA THAT WILL MOVE BOTH THE PARTY & THE COUNTRY DECIDEDLY TO
THE LEFT OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM
FULL STORY:
The rampant confusion and dismay among Democrats in the wake of the Tuesday, November 2, election shows that they have no idea
as to why they lost. And, if they continue in this state of ignorance and denial, they are unlikely to turn such defeat into future victories.
Unfortunately, an equivalent danger faces the Republican Party. If it fails to recognize the reasons for its success during this election
cycle, it may once again stumble at a crucial time, and face dire consequences in upcoming elections. With the grim specter of a Hillary
Clinton candidacy looming in 2008, America can ill afford such a blunder.
Before the votes were fully counted, forces were working to undermine the message sent forth so clearly by the electorate. Any
attempts to ignore the real meaning of this election, or to take for granted the loyalty of the Conservative base who made it happen,
could ultimately backfire on Republicans, as happened in 1996 and again in 1998.
The landslide Republican Congressional gains in 1994, much like 2004, directly resulted from involvement by grassroots Conservatives.
And that involvement was a reaction to the obvious contrast between the agendas of Liberals and Conservatives. Unfortunately, once
the Conservative victory had been achieved, Republican insiders immediately embarked on a program of blurring the distinctions
between the two.
“Business as usual” overtook the Conservative revolution. The public responded with disappointment and cynicism. Bill Clinton, with
less than half of the lowest voter turnout in decades, did not win his 1996 race as a result of enthusiasm for his political philosophies.
Rather, as uninspired as the nation was with him, the Republican base was even less inspired to support the constant waffling and
capitulation of Bob Dole.
It is highly significant that the last Democratic President to receive greater than fifty percent of the popular vote was Jimmy Carter, in
his 1976 race against Gerald Ford. While some of Carter’s support resulted from public disgust with the Nixon administration, much of
it was a direct response to Carter’s open professions of his Baptist roots.
It was this perception of a moral component to Carter’s philosophy that convinced the public to support him. Such a case was
relatively easy to make, when Carter’s professed virtue was contrasted against the darkness of the Nixon White House.
Of course, once Carter’s “spirituality” turned out to be nothing more than empty rhetoric, his popularity plummeted, and never
recovered.
Over the past three decades, a consistent pattern in the political landscape has emerged, though Republican Party insiders, at the
prodding of socalled “Moderates,” or "Centrists," continually seek to ignore the pattern. Every Republican President’s success in
office can be directly correlated to the degree of morality and Conservatism that he espouses. But sadly, the “conventional wisdom”
from party hacks is that the politically safe ground is at the philosophical “Center.”
The pro-homosexual organization known as the “Log Cabin Republicans” (not named for any allegiance to Abraham Lincoln, but
as a reference to the human anatomy), showed their true colors this past Summer when they refused to endorse President Bush.
Their goal, with his defeat looking likely at the time, was to position themselves to make the claim that he lost, in part, because of
their lack of support. Thus they could ever after hold the Republican Party hostage to their agenda.
Yet, not only did this ruse backfire, other evidence of electoral antipathy towards their agenda is inarguable. In all eleven states
where same-sex “marriage” bans were on the ballot, the initiatives passed by overwhelming margins.
Although a shift to the Right may be smart politics for Liberals, it does not follow that a shift to the Left will similarly benefit
Republicans. In truth, nothing could be more absurd. Yet for more than a decade, such thinking is exactly what Republican
“Moderates” have promoted, and with consistently disastrous results.
In South Dakota, John Thune’s victory over Tom Daschle sent an unambiguous message to Washington, D.C., that America
takes a very dim view of those who would subvert the U.S. Constitution through the encroaching tyranny of judicial activism.
If Senate Republicans, after witnessing such deep-seated fervor from the electorate, choose not to take on this battle as if the
very future of our Constitutional Republic depends on it (which, in fact, it does), the anger vented against Daschle will shortly be
transferred to them.
A great victory has been won. This is no time to let “Moderates” take the reins once again and thus squander it.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
American Politics & Political Competition
American Government & the U.S. Presidency
Liberalism Versus Conservatism in American Politics
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer who lives in southeastern Wyoming and works in the field of industrial instrumentation.
He is actively involved in Wyoming's political process, serving as a delegate to successive Wyoming State Republican Conventions
and as a member of the Wyoming State Republican Central Committee. He has assisted Republican candidates for local and state
legislatures and for the United States Congress. His articles, which appear regularly in The Progressive Conservative, U.S.A.,
and on a number of other websites, reflect a major concern with the damage being done to Conservatism and Conservative causes by
the Liberal Leftist faction in the Republican Party as well as by the much larger and more powerful Liberal Leftist faction in the
Democratic Party. During the early and middle 1990s, Adamo was Editor of the Wyoming Christian Coalition's official news organ,
The Wyoming Christian. Adamo maintains his own Internet website, which is located at
www.chrisadamo.com.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy