THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VII, Issue # 25, January 30, 2005
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
WISHES & HORSES FOR AFRICA & OTHER DEVELOPING REGIONS:
THE LETHAL CHASM BETWEEN WIND ENERGY HYPE & REALITY
By Paul K. Driessen
ENVIRONMENTALISM, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, & WIND POWER AS AN "ALTERNATIVE" SOURCE OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY FOR
THIRD WORLD NATIONS: HOW ENVIRONMENTALIST PRESSURE ON BANKS & ENERGY COMPANIES TO ABANDON FOSSIL
FUEL, NUCLEAR, & HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS IN FAVOR OF WIND & SOLAR POWER IS YET ANOTHER MASSIVE HUMAN RIGHTS
VIOLATION PERPETRATED ON THE WORLD'S MOST DESTITUTE PEOPLES, IN THE NAME OF PROTECTING THE PLANET FROM
DISTANT, CONJECTURAL "THREATS"
FULL STORY:
“I would promote wind for power, not damming more rivers,” says actor Ed Begley, Jr. It’s low-cost, renewable, inexhaustible,
eco-friendly, and emits no greenhouse gases.
If banks and energy companies financed wind energy projects, they’d help protect wildlife and habitats, “instead of hurting the Earth
for oil,” intones the Rainforest Action Network.
If America devoted a mere 1% of its land area to wind turbine farms, it could generate 20% of its electricity from wind, asserts the
American Wind Energy Association.
And if wishes were horses, beggars would ride.
Sadly, equine mirages don’t make sound energy policy. They may generate good sound bites, political polemics, and fund-raising
appeals. But they don’t generate much electricity.
In the United States, wind power accounts for less than 0.1% of the electricity produced by renewable sources. The hydroelectric
projects Mr. Begley opposes generate 99% of all U.S. electricity from renewables and 11% of all U.S. electricity. It’s easy to see why.
Wind energy is unreliable. Mother Nature doesn’t always cooperate, and electricity produced on windy days cannot be stored for
use during calm periods.
That means expensive gas-fired power plants must serve as backup, standing idle most of the time, but ready to kick in whenever the
wind dies down. Otherwise, brownouts and blackouts disrupt whatever depends on the wind-generated electricity: homes, schools,
hospitals, assembly lines, offices, shops, traffic lights. Wind can supplement nuclear, hydro, coal, gas, or oil power – but it’s not an
alternative.
Wind energy is expensive. England’s Royal Academy of Engineering and Scotland’s David Hume Institute found that wind farm
electricity costs twice as much as nuclear or fossil fuel power (including facility decommissioning costs). Similar cost imbalances
apply in the U.S.A., but subsidies, special tax treatment, and laws requiring utilities to purchase wind-generated electricity mask its
true costs, notes energy consultant Glenn Schleede.
Wind power is land-hungry. A single 555-megawatt gas-fired power plant in California generates more electricity in a year than do all
13,000 of the state’s wind turbines, journalist Ron Bailey has calculated. The gas-fired plant requires a mere 15 acres. The turbine
forest impacts 105,000 acres.
Generating 20% of America’s electricity with wind (what it currently gets from nuclear power) makes for good PR or barroom banter.
But 1% of the United States is the state of Virginia –23,000,000 acres – whereas all the nuclear plants in the U.S.A. take up only
73,000 acres.
Wind farms ruin habitats and scenic vistas. Because most are located along escarpments and mountaintops, monstrous turbines the
height of the Statue of Liberty destroy aesthetic values. Even wind energy advocates like Senator Ted Kennedy morph into vocal
opponents when wind farms are proposed for Cape Cod or other sites in their own backyards.
Wind turbines kill. The growth of wind power represents “an imminent threat” to hundreds of bird species, to millions of birds and
bats along West Virginia’s Allegheny Front, says Congressman Alan Mollohan (D-WV). His concerns are echoed by the Audubon
Society, Nature Conservancy, Bat Conservation International, and Center for Biological Diversity. Just in Northern California’s
Altamont Pass, wind turbines kill thousands of birds every year, including 1,000 eagles, hawks, owls and other birds of prey, in
violation of bird protection laws, they stress.
No wonder wind plays a near-zero role in the United States and Europe. To impose this energy mirage on Kenya, Uganda, India,
Bolivia, and other impoverished nations would be a human and ecological disaster.
In those destitute lands, 2 billion people still don’t have electricity. Nearly a billion struggle to survive on less than a dollar a day. In
India alone, 150 million households rely on firewood, dung, and agriculture waste for cooking, analyst Barun Mitra points out.
These fuels are 20 times less efficient, 20 times more polluting, than electricity or natural gas.
As a result, four million children and mothers worldwide die every year from lung infections. Millions more perish from unsafe water,
malnutrition and disease, in regions where clinics and hospitals are few and often have electricity only intermittently, if at all.
These poorer societies desperately need abundant, reliable, affordable electricity – to provide basic necessities that wealthy
countries take for granted, to create economic opportunities and jobs, and to help the poorer nations end the vicious cycle of foreign
aid, corruption, poverty, disease, and early death.
But in the name of protecting the planet from dams, fossil fuels, global warming, and development that might lure people away from
“indigenous lifestyles,” Western radical environmental activists continue to block energy projects. In their view, wind and solar are
the only “appropriate” energy sources for the underdeveloped nations.
The Rainforest Action Network and International Rivers Network pressure banks and energy companies to abandon hydroelectric
and fossil fuel projects, and support only renewables. Friends of the Earth is “proud” that it’s stopped over 300 hydroelectric
projects. The Earth Island Institute longs for the day when Africa’s poor make clothing for their neighbors “on foot-pedal-powered
sewing machines,” and says “once they get electricity, they spend too much time watching television and listening to the radio.”
Lavishly funded by foundations, governments and corporations, Greenpeace, Sierra Club and dozens of other radical environmental
activist groups likewise wage war on life-giving technologies.
But, even if the Serengeti were blanketed with wind turbines, and millions of African birds were sacrificed annually to these
Cuisinarts of the air, its poor families would be lucky to get a lightbulb and radio for their mosquito-infested huts. Sustained
development, modern schools and hospitals, offices and factories, and hope for the future would remain beyond reach.
Developing nations should not have to accept this. If “human rights” mean anything, they should begin with the most basic one of
all: life itself.
Caring people everywhere need to do more to encourage corporate CEOs, directors, shareholders, and “social responsibility”
officers to resist environmentalist pressure and help bring modern technology to the world’s poor. Without an adequate energy
generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure, vast regions of Africa, Asia, and Latin America will remain mired in abject
poverty, and millions will continue to die.
Republicans and Democrats … religious, civic, and minority leaders … human rights commissions and organizations … aid agencies
and charitable foundations … the European Union and United Nations – all need to support developing countries’ fundamental
rights to infrastructure and prosperity.
The world’s poor long to have a few of the blessings we enjoy – and to see a rebirth of compassion, common sense, balance, and
human rights in environmental policies. Surely, it’s not too much to ask.
© 2005 Paul K. Driessen
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality, the Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow, and the
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen is author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, which can be
obtained at www.Eco-Imperialism.com. Email: pdriessen@cox.net --- Telephone:
(703) 698-6171
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VII, 2005
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues